Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kent Displays, Inc. v. United States”
Kent Displays, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24-57 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KENT DISPLAYS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge v. Court No. 20-00156 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [ Granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Kent Displays, Inc.’s claim that its imported goods are entitled to exc
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Go4Play, Inc. v. Kent County Board of Adjustmentpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GO4PLAY, INC., d/b/a Bendover, a ) Delaware corporation, and 5455 DUPONT ) HIGHWAY, LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company, ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. K21A-01-003 NEP ) THE KENT COUNTY BOARD OF ) ADJUSTMENT,
Kent v. McDermott (In re Kent)public domain
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge David M. Kent, a former plastic surgeon, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, listing among his debts certain obligations that resulted from a state court action for separate maintenance. Kent's estranged wife, Linda Kent, filed an adversary proceeding complaint alleging fraud and challenging dischargeability. After Linda's attorney was allowed to withdraw, and her own enthusiasm for t
Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Kentpublic domain
Pollak, J. *201*814The California Legislature reduced Medicaid hospital payments 10 percent between 2008 and 2011 and the federal agency administering the Medicaid program approved the rate reductions. A group of hospitals allege the rate reductions violat
Charles Jones v. Kent County, Mich.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0182p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CHARLES JONES, as personal representative of the │ estate of Wade Jo
Apple Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 19-1869 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 07/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1869 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Gilbert v. Kent County Memorial Hospitalpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1118 RICHARD GILBERT, Medical Doctor, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. KENT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; MICHAEL DACEY, Medical Doctor, in his individual capacity and as President of Kent Hospital, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RH
McDade, David Kentpublic domain
Cause No. § David Kent McDade, § in the COURT OF CRIMMINAL APPEALS § TRAVIS COUNTY § AUSTIN, TEXAS Petitioner § § PETITION FOR
Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.public domain
SARA LIOI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Lauren Kesterson ("Kesterson") brings this civil rights action against defendants Kent State University ("Kent State"), Eric Oakley ("Oakley"), and Karen Linder ("Linder"). Each defendant has moved for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 164 ["Kent State MSJ"]; Doc. No. 161 ["Oakley MSJ"]; Doc. No. 166 ["Linder MSJ"].) Plaintiff opposes each motion. (Doc. No. 173 ["Kent State MSJ Opp'n"]; Do
Lauren Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0227p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LAUREN KESTERSON, │ │
Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
35 U.S.C. § 103; Patent validity; Obviousness; Graham factors; Secondary considerations; Objective indicia of nonobviousness; hindsight bias. OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is a patent infringement action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (2012). Plaintiff, SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. (“SecurityPoint”), alleges
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital v. Kentpublic domain
Filed 7/31/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A151588 v. (City & County of San Francisco JENNIFER KENT, as Director, etc.,
Ray J. Kraklio v. Kent Simmonspublic domain
WATERMAN, Justice. This appeal presents the narrow question of whether the relief-required rule (also called the exoneration rule) applies to a convicted criminal suing one of his defense attorneys for legal malpractice over an alleged missed opportunity to shorten his period of supervised probation. This rule ordinarily requires proof the client had been exonerated from the underlying
Kent v. Iowapublic domain
651 F.Supp.2d 910 (2009) Joseph KENT, Plaintiff, v. The State of IOWA, Newton Correctional Facility, Terry Mapes (in his individual capacity), Kris Weitzell (in her individual capacity), Troy White (in his individual capacity), Carol Van Gorp (in her individual capacity), Jeff Panknen (in his individual capacity), Cindy Conn (in her individual capacity), Larry Lipscomb (in his individual capacity), Carol Boggess (in her individual capacity), Des
Michael Kent v. County of Oaklandpublic domain
VAN TATENHOVE, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which MOORE, J., joined. SUHRHEINRICH, J. (pp. 398-403), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE,' District Judge. The events underlying this civil rights action alleging excessive force arose when *387Oakland County Sheriffs Deputies Cl
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE On April 21, 2017, Galderma Laboratories L.P., Galderma S.A., and Nestlé Skin Health S.A. (collectively, "Galderma") brought this action against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. for infringement of several patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271(d)(2)(A). (D.I. 1). I held a bench trial from June 10
Falana v. Kent State Universitypublic domain
669 F.3d 1349 (2012) Olusegun FALANA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENT STATE UNIVERSITY and Alexander J. Seed, Defendants-Appellants. No. 2011-1198. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. January 23, 2012. *1351 Bruce H. Wilson, of Akron, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellee. R. Eric Gaum, Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP, o
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ENTITLEMENT TO RELIANCE DAMAGES AND SANCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT’S “BAD FAITH” CONDUCT RELATING TO PRIVILEGE ASSERTIONS DURING DISCOVERY BRADEN, Judge. This case arises from a commercial dispute between the Department of Energy (“DOE”) and Chevron U.S.A.,