⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kent Displays, Inc. v. United States”

United States Court of International Trade · 2024-05-09 · Published · cited 1× · 698 F. Supp. 3d 1339; 2024 CIT 57
Slip Op. 24-57 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KENT DISPLAYS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge v. Court No. 20-00156 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [ Granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Kent Displays, Inc.’s claim that its imported goods are entitled to exc
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 904
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 904; 121 S. Ct. 1226
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GO4PLAY, INC., d/b/a Bendover, a ) Delaware corporation, and 5455 DUPONT ) HIGHWAY, LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company, ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. K21A-01-003 NEP ) THE KENT COUNTY BOARD OF ) ADJUSTMENT,
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 594 B.R. 863
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge David M. Kent, a former plastic surgeon, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, listing among his debts certain obligations that resulted from a state court action for separate maintenance. Kent's estranged wife, Linda Kent, filed an adversary proceeding complaint alleging fraud and challenging dischargeability. After Linda's attorney was allowed to withdraw, and her own enthusiasm for t
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 16× · 236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 199; 25 Cal. App. 5th 811
Pollak, J. *201*814The California Legislature reduced Medicaid hospital payments 10 percent between 2008 and 2011 and the federal agency administering the Medicaid program approved the rate reductions. A group of hospitals allege the rate reductions violat
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-08-16 · Published · cited 2× · 115 F.4th 504
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0182p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CHARLES JONES, as personal representative of the │ estate of Wade Jo
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-07-02 · Published · cited 9× · 964 F.3d 1087
Case: 19-1869 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 07/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1869 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 64 F.4th 44
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1118 RICHARD GILBERT, Medical Doctor, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. KENT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; MICHAEL DACEY, Medical Doctor, in his individual capacity and as President of Kent Hospital, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RH
McDade, David Kentpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
Cause No. § David Kent McDade, § in the COURT OF CRIMMINAL APPEALS § TRAVIS COUNTY § AUSTIN, TEXAS Petitioner § § PETITION FOR
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018-11-05 · Published · cited 1× · 345 F. Supp. 3d 855
SARA LIOI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Lauren Kesterson ("Kesterson") brings this civil rights action against defendants Kent State University ("Kent State"), Eric Oakley ("Oakley"), and Karen Linder ("Linder"). Each defendant has moved for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 164 ["Kent State MSJ"]; Doc. No. 161 ["Oakley MSJ"]; Doc. No. 166 ["Linder MSJ"].) Plaintiff opposes each motion. (Doc. No. 173 ["Kent State MSJ Opp'n"]; Do
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-07-23 · Published · cited 23× · 967 F.3d 519
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0227p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LAUREN KESTERSON, │ │
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-10-28 · Published · cited 1× · 129 Fed. Cl. 25; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1582; 2016 WL 6311875
35 U.S.C. § 103; Patent validity; Obviousness; Graham factors; Secondary considerations; Objective indicia of nonobviousness; hindsight bias. OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is a patent infringement action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (2012). Plaintiff, SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. (“SecurityPoint”), alleges
California Court of Appeal · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/31/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A151588 v. (City & County of San Francisco JENNIFER KENT, as Director, etc.,
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018-03-16 · Published · cited 6× · 909 N.W.2d 427
WATERMAN, Justice. This appeal presents the narrow question of whether the relief-required rule (also called the exoneration rule) applies to a convicted criminal suing one of his defense attorneys for legal malpractice over an alleged missed opportunity to shorten his period of supervised probation. This rule ordinarily requires proof the client had been exonerated from the underlying
Kent v. Iowapublic domain
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009-09-10 · Published · cited 3× · 651 F. Supp. 2d 910; 2009 WL 2902469
651 F.Supp.2d 910 (2009) Joseph KENT, Plaintiff, v. The State of IOWA, Newton Correctional Facility, Terry Mapes (in his individual capacity), Kris Weitzell (in her individual capacity), Troy White (in his individual capacity), Carol Van Gorp (in her individual capacity), Jeff Panknen (in his individual capacity), Cindy Conn (in her individual capacity), Larry Lipscomb (in his individual capacity), Carol Boggess (in her individual capacity), Des
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-01-06 · Published · cited 128× · 810 F.3d 384; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 60; 2016 WL 66566
VAN TATENHOVE, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which MOORE, J., joined. SUHRHEINRICH, J. (pp. 398-403), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE,' District Judge. The events underlying this civil rights action alleging excessive force arose when *387Oakland County Sheriffs Deputies Cl
District Court, D. Delaware · 2019-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 390 F. Supp. 3d 582
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE On April 21, 2017, Galderma Laboratories L.P., Galderma S.A., and Nestlé Skin Health S.A. (collectively, "Galderma") brought this action against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. for infringement of several patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271(d)(2)(A). (D.I. 1). I held a bench trial from June 10
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012-01-23 · Published · cited 17× · 669 F.3d 1349; 101 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1414; 2012 WL 171550; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1245
669 F.3d 1349 (2012) Olusegun FALANA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENT STATE UNIVERSITY and Alexander J. Seed, Defendants-Appellants. No. 2011-1198. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. January 23, 2012. *1351 Bruce H. Wilson, of Akron, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellee. R. Eric Gaum, Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP, o
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2014-05-16 · Published · cited 6× · 116 Fed. Cl. 202; 181 Oil & Gas Rep. 557; 2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 396
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ENTITLEMENT TO RELIANCE DAMAGES AND SANCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT’S “BAD FAITH” CONDUCT RELATING TO PRIVILEGE ASSERTIONS DURING DISCOVERY BRADEN, Judge. This case arises from a commercial dispute between the Department of Energy (“DOE”) and Chevron U.S.A.,