Cases

OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Town of Kent (“the Town”) and Police Officers Darren Cea and Thomas Carroll (collectively “Defendants”), (Doc. 24), and the Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Ernest L. Robinson, III, (Doc. 25). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, an

PER CURIAM. The petitioner herein and plaintiff below, Robert L. Burnworth (“Mr. Burnworth”), appeals from orders entered July 23, 2012, and August 10, 2012, by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. By the July 23, 2012, order, the circuit court found that Mr. Burn-worth was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on his claim of legal malpractice against the respondents here

800 F.Supp.2d 624 (2011) Michael DUFFY, Plaintiff, v. KENT COUNTY LEVY COURT, Defendant. Civ. No. 09-198-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 31, 2011. *626 Michael Duffy, Clayton, DE, pro se. Chad J. Toms, Esq., Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.C., Wilmington, DE, for Defendant. Ralph K. Durstein

361 F.Supp.2d 4 (2005) CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. THE KENT SCHOOL CORPORATION Defendant. No. CIV.A.3:02 CV 1095(C). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 17, 2005. *5 Frank F. Coulom, Jr., Marion B. Manzo, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, CT, Lawrence P. Heffernan, Robinson & Cole, Boston, MA,

601 S.E.2d 426 (2004) 268 Ga. App. 52 ROBINSON et al. v. ELLIS. No. A04A0550. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 21, 2004. Certiorari Denied September 27, 2004. Savage & Turner, Robert Turner, Spurlin, & Spurlin, John Spurlin Tifton, for Appellants. Martin Kent, A. Martin Kent, Sigman & Bogle, Elizabeth Whit

725 S.E.2d 426 (2012) RINK & ROBINSON, PLLC, Plaintiff, v. CATAWBA VALLEY ENTERPRISES, LLC, Data Storage Technology, Inc., P. Aaron Blizzard, and Brian S. Dye, Defendant. No. COA11-955. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 1, 2012. *428 Bill Morgan, attorney for plaintiff. W. Wallace Respess, Jr. of Respess & Ju

DICKINSON, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. The wrongful-death heirs of two persons who died in an automobile accident sued a casino and the driver of the other vehicle. The trial court held the casino and driver jointly and severally liable. The casino appealed, arguing that it cannot be held liable under Mississippi’s Dram Shop Act, which requires proof that it served alcohol to the driver when he was visibl

SMITH, Presiding Judge. Defendant, Charles Robinson, appeals from a judgment against him of $30,318.37 in a court tried case. Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of selling and distributing gasoline, oil, petroleum products, and service station merchandise. It filed a seven count petition against Charles Robinson and Sylvia Robinson, his wife. Counts I, III, V, VI and VII alleged that plaintiff “at the special ins

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, Senior District Judge. This civil rights case comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The 196 individual plaintiffs ask the court to certify a class consisting of certain persons who have been detained at the Shawnee County Jail pursuant to a warrantless arrest. Plaintiffs propose certification of seven separate subclasses. Quite unconventionally, plainti

352 S.E.2d 684 (1987) 319 N.C. 63 NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK v. C.P. ROBINSON COMPANY, INC. and C.P. Robinson, Jr. No. 269A86. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 3, 1987. *685 Hutchins, Tyndall, Doughton & Moore by George E. Doughton, Jr., and Kent L. Hamrick, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appe

OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), a subsidiary of MERSCORP, Inc., operates an electronic mortgage registration system (“the MERS System”). MERS is distinct from the MERS System. The MERS System is a private electronic database that records the ownership of and servicing rights in home loans. Various

Judge Webb dissenting. I dissent. I do not believe there was a construction of the will in Forsyth County in spite of the recitals in the court’s order. I believe it was proper to sell whatever interest the defendant might have in his father’s estate in Forsyth County. The purchaser of this interest may then bring an action in Anson County to determine what this interest may be. I vote to affirm.

894 S.W.2d 525 (1995) Bryan D. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Kevin R. BRICE, Appellee. No. 03-93-00123-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. March 8, 1995. Rehearing Overruled April 12, 1995. *526 Ranelle M. Meroney, Wright & Greenhill, Austin, David C. Kent, Hughes & Luce, L.L.P., Dallas, for appellant. <

MARKEY, Chief Judge. Kent Robinson (Robinson) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court, 454 F.Supp. 1160, for the Northern District of California denying his claim for the refund of federal estate taxes which he paid as Executor of the estate of his mother, Hazel S. Robinson (Decedent). We affirm.

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This appeal by Thomas Jefferson Kent arises from a wire fraud conspiracy case against Kent, Sanford Gottesman, Brad Robinson, and Beno Matthews, 1 who were each convicted in connection with them participation in an “advance fee” scheme— a scheme in which supposed lending companies op

Per Curiam. Charles F. Robinson and Josephine A. Robinson appeal a jury verdict in favor of appellees in a medical malpractice action brought in Lancaster County District Court. The Robinsons allege that appellees Bob J. Bleicher, M.D., and Kent R. Eakins, M.D., failed to obtain Charles F. Robinson’s informed consent for the surgical procedure accomplished and that appellee Bryan Memorial Hospital negligently failed to prese

NYU Langone Hosps. v Robinson (2025 NY Slip Op 00666) NYU Langone Hosps. v Robinson 2025 NY Slip Op 00666 Decided on February 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@state.vt.us or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2015 VT 126

J-S58041-16 NON -PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. RONALD J. KENT Appellant No. 236 MDA 2016 Appeal from the Order Dated November 24, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of

04/08/2025 .IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2025 KENT E. BARTON, JR. v. CANDAYCE J. KELLER Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. FF9126 Tarik B. Sugarmon, Judge ___________________________________