Cases

458 F.3d 1025 George J. KENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, andTicor Title Co. of California, Defendant-counter-claimant.George J. Kenney, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.United States of America, Defendant-Appellant, andTicor Title Co. of California, Defendant-counter-claimant.George J. Kenney, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.United States of America, Defendant-Appellant, andTicor Title

*40 HOWARD, Circuit Judge. After pleading guilty to drug distribution, robbery, and firearm charges, Robert Kenney now seeks withdrawal of his guilty plea. He argues that the district court erred in failing to assess his competency, that it inadequately assessed whether his plea was “knowing” and “voluntary”

(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Rochelle KENNEY, Defendant. No. CR-07-66-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. April 28, 2008. ORDER ON MOTION DIRECTING THE RETURN OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge. Over the Defendant objection and acting pursuant to the All Writs Act, the Court orders the De

HUG, Circuit Judge. This case concerns U.S. Government (“Government”) tax liens on the proceeds of the sale of a house owned by George Kenney (“Kenney”) and his former wife, Donna. They owned the house as joint tenants. The Government liens extend only to Donna’s interest in the proceeds. Over the years Kenney had made the entire payments on the notes secured by deeds of trust

329 F.Supp.2d 1193 (2004) George J. KENNEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. C03-3848 BZ. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 30, 2004. *1194 Benjamin Crispin Sanchez, Martin J. Tierney, Tierney, Watson & Healy, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. *1195<

152 F.Supp.2d 631 (2001) UNITED STATES of America v. John C. KENNEY, Defendant. No. 4:CR-99-0280. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 10, 2001. *632 Frederick E. Martin, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Williamsport, PA, for the United States. Jeffrey C. Dohrmann, Es

PER CURIAM: Ronnie Brunson Kenney appeals his conviction for soliciting a gratuity as a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(B). On appeal, Appellant asserts that the District Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss due to pre-indictment delay; that the District Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss on the ground that he is not a “public official” as

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. This matter comes on before this court on John Charles Kenney’s appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in this criminal case on November 21, 2001. A grand jury indicted Kenney, a federal inmate, on charges of assaulting a corrections officer, 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1), resisting a corrections office

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Michael Wayne Kenney appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court 2 for the Northern District of Iowa sentencing him to 100 months imprisonment after pleading guilty to one count of possession of firearms as a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) a

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. The sole question in this direct appeal is whether John Kenney’s conviction for possession of a machine gun is invalid because the criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), is unconstitutional. He argues that the Supreme Court’s reasoning in United States v. Lopez, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), demonstrates that § 922(o) exc

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting: While I agree with much of the court’s disposition, I am unable to join part C thereof. Having an Assistant U.S. Attorney who worked on the case testify before the jury is almost always an unwise and perilous exercise as it raises serious temptations for prosecutorial overreaching. In this case the temptation proved too great; it denied the defendant a fair trial.

OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. I. On July 25,1991, a man wearing a baseball cap, mask and black gloves entered the In-tegra Bank branch office in Charleroi, Pennsylvania, brandished a small silver handgun and demanded the money from each teller’s cash drawer. John C. Kenney, and his co-conspirator, James Pavelko, were i

622 F.Supp. 219 (1985) Edward Patrick KENNEY [Taxpayer], Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, [Internal Revenue Service], Defendant. Civ. No. 85-0142 P. United States District Court, D.C. Maine. November 15, 1985. *220 Judy Potter, University of Southern Maine Law School, Portland, Me., for petitioner. Richard S. Cohen

603 F.Supp. 936 (1985) UNITED STATES of America v. Edward Patrick KENNEY. Crim. No. 84-00007-01-P. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 26, 1985. *937 Joseph H. Groff, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Me., for plaintiff. Daniel G. Lilley, Portland, Me., for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOT

298 F.Supp.2d 139 (2003) Steven C. KENNEY, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Postal Service, Defendant No. 03-44-P-DMC. United States District Court, D. Maine. January 14, 2003. Christopher C. Dinan, Monaghan, Leahy, Hochadel & Libby, Portland, ME, *140 David J. Marchese, Portland, ME, for Steven C Kenney, Plaintiff.

598 F.Supp. 883 (1984) UNITED STATES of America v. Edward Patrick KENNEY, et al. Crim. No. 84-00007-01-P. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 11, 1984. *884 Richard S. Cohen, Joseph H. Groff, III, Portland, Maine, for plaintiff. Daniel G. Lilley, Portland, Maine, for defendants. MEMORANDUM OF D

598 F.Supp. 874 (1984) UNITED STATES of America v. Edward Patrick KENNEY, et al. Crim. No. 84-00007-01-P. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 5, 1984. *875 Richard S. Cohen, U.S. Atty., Joseph H. Groff, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Me., for plaintiff. Daniel G. Lilley, Portland, Me., for defendants.

595 F.Supp. 1453 (1984) UNITED STATES of America v. Edward Patrick KENNEY and Mark Needelman. Crim. Nos. 84-00007-01-P, 84-00007-02-P. United States District Court, D. Maine. October 15, 1984. *1454 Richard S. Cohen, U.S. Atty., Joseph H. Groff III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Maine, for plaintiff. Daniel G. Lilley, Portla

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, Defendant-Appellant Jerry Doby challenges the district court's denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3145 (a)(2) and

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: Defendant was convicted of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1982). 1 He was sentenced to a 25-year term of incarceration and ordered to make restitution in the amount of $1425 as a condition of parole. We find no statutory authorit