⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Kenneth Taylor v. Michael Kors, Inc.”

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 447 B.R. 475
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986-03-13 · Published · cited 387× · 506 A.2d 173; 66 A.L.R. 4th 157; 1986 Del. LEXIS 1053
506 A.2d 173 (1986) REVLON, INC., a Delaware corporation, Michel C. Bergerac, Simon Aldewereld, Sander P. Alexander, Jay I. Bennett, Irving J. Bottner, Jacob Burns, Lewis L. Glucksman, John Loudon, Aileen Mehle, Samuel L. Simmons, Ian R. Wilson, Paul P. Woolard, Ezra K. Zilkha, Forstmann Little & Co., a New York limited partnership, and Forstmann Little & Co. Subordinated Debt and Equity Management Buyout Partnership-II, a New York limited partne
District Court, D. Maryland · 2001-11-01 · Published · cited 10× · 269 B.R. 139; 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 255; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17853
269 B.R. 139 (2001) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Syed RAHMAN, Plaintiff, v. ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., Defendants. In re Equimed, Inc., Debtor. Merrill Cohen, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Douglas Colkitt, M.D., et al., Defendants. In re Nixon Equipment Corporation, et al., Debtors. In re Equimed, Inc., Debtor. Equimed, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Steadfast Insurance Company and Reliance Insurance Company
Baxter v. Bockpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2016-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/18/16; part. pub. & mod. order 5/24/16 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE JOSEPH BAXTER, Plaintiff and Appellant, A142372, A142984, A143689 v. (Sonoma County MICHAEL BOCK et al.,
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 592 B.R. 761
KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the Debtors' Motion for Approval of Certain Compromises and Settlements, Partial Substantive Consolidation, and Related Relief with Respect to the Plan (D.I. 2721) (the "Motion"), and the Debtors' request for confirmation of the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan *764of Liquid
District Court, E.D. New York · 2009-12-23 · Published · cited 1× · 697 F. Supp. 2d 287; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126578; 2009 WL 6093272
697 F.Supp.2d 287 (2009) CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. and Church & Dwight Virginia Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. KALOTI ENTERPRISES OF MICHIGAN, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 0612(BMC). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 23, 2009. *289 Geoffrey Potter, Aron Fischer, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2003-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 344 F. Supp. 2d 686
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT NOVARTIS AG’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a resident of Tennessee, filed a complaint in federal district court in Oregon alleging injuries stemming from her consumption of PPA-containing products. She included in this action as defendants, among others, Novartis AG (“NAG”), Novartis Corporat
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002-01-09 · Published · cited 20× · 188 F. Supp. 2d 684; 2002 WL 200956
188 F.Supp.2d 684 (2002) Mark NEWBY, Plaintiff, v. ENRON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Amalgamated Bank, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. H-01-3624, CIV.A. H-01-4198. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 9, 2002.
In re Owens Corningpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-10-12 · Published · cited 152× · 419 F.3d 195; 2005 WL 1939796
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. We consider under what circumstances a court exercising bankruptcy powers may substantively consolidate affiliated entities. Appellant Credit Suisse First Boston (“CSFB”) is the agent for a syndicate of banks (collectively, the “Banks”)1 that extended in 1997 a $2 billion unsecured loan to Owens Corning, a Delaware corporation (“OCD”)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-15-2005 In Re: Owens Corning Precedential or Non-Prece
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS