⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kenneth Ronald Keller”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-09-03 · Published · cited 58× · 341 F.3d 593; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18154; 2003 WL 22047383
OPINION GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant James D. Hood II brought suit in federal district court against defendant-appellee Ronald Keller, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board; defendant-appellee Richard Finan, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board; and defendant-appel-lee Kenneth Morck
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004-09-29 · Published · cited 25× · 385 F.3d 694; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20495; 2004 WL 2169413
385 F.3d 694 Douglas R. PARKS, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Richard H. FINAN; Ronald T. Keller; Kenneth L. Morckel; Lee A. Darden, Defendants-Appellants. No. 03-3848. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 16, 2004. Decided and Filed: September 29, 2004. Appeal from the United
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000-04-25 · Published · cited 5× · 210 F.3d 703; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7535
210 F.3d 703 (6th Cir. 2000) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO; MATTHEW PETERSON, REVEREND,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,V.CAPITOL SQUARE REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD; ROBERT TAFT, GOVERNOR OF OHIO; RONALD R. KELLER; DANIEL SHELLENBARGER; RICHARD H. FINAN; J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE; THOMAS M. ZAINO, TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 98-4106 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE
Presley, Ronaldpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0876-15 PD-0876-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/14/2015 11:59:03 AM Accepted 7/15/2015 4:32:00 PM
District Court, N.D. California · 2010-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 726 F. Supp. 2d 1045; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54012; 2010 WL 2228571
726 F.Supp.2d 1045 (2010) The CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS, a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff, v. The JACKSON LABORATORY, a Maine corporation, Defendant. No. C-08-05568 RMW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. June 1, 2010. *1046 Joseph Diamante, Kenneth E. Keller, Michael David Lisi, R
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983-08-16 · Published · cited 12× · 717 F.2d 324; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24823
POSNER, Circuit Judge. This appeal from a judgment for the defendants in a diversity suit requires us to interpret and apply two Illinois statutes in a setting of alleged fraud against a creditor. The plaintiff is Capitol Indemnity Corporation. The defendants are J.H. and Fred Keller and other members of the Keller family; a bank in West Frankfort, Illinois; and the Gipsons. </
State v. Kellerpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2001-03-22 · Published · cited 195× · 143 Wash. 2d 267; 19 P.3d 1030; 2001 Wash. LEXIS 255
Smith, J. Petitioner Lawrence John Keller seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed his conviction in the King County Superior Court for vehicular assault under former RCW 46.61.522(1)(b) and felony hit and run under RCW 46.52.020.1 Petitioner was determined to be a persistent offender with three “strikes,” thus subjecting him to the penalty of life imprisonment
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-03-16 · Published · cited 33× · 243 F.3d 289; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964
243 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 2001) American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio and The Reverend Matthew Peterson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board; Robert Taft, Governor of Ohio; Ronald R. Keller, Executive Director of the Board; Daniel Shellenbarger, Assistant Director of the Board; Richard H. Finan, Ohio State Senator; J. Kenneth Blackwell, Secretary of State; and Thomas M. Zaino, Tax Commissioner, Defendants-Appellee
Hood v. Kellerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Hood v. Keller, et al. No. 02-3402 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0314P (6th Cir.) File Name: 03a0314p.06 GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Nathan W. Kellum, CENTER FOR INALIENABLE RIGHTS, Memphi
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2010-11-10 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued November 10, 2010. In The Court of Appeals
In re DePinhopublic domain
Texas Supreme Court · 2016-05-20 · Published · cited 30× · 505 S.W.3d 621; 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 917; 2016 WL 2979797; 2016 Tex. LEXIS 385
PER CURIAM Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure allows a court to authorize a deposition “to investigate a potential claim or suit.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 202.1(b). In this original mandamus proceeding, rela-tors Ronald DePinho and Andrew Dennis argue that a court may not order Rule 202 depositions to investigate unripe claims. We agree. Because the trial court in this case did just that, we conditionally gran
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996-07-17 · Published · cited 17× · 90 F.3d 1217; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17568
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Defendants were tried before a jury for participating in an illegal gambling business *1219 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. The jury found all of the defendants guilty, and the defendants moved for a new trial, arguing that the government had failed to prove a violation of
State v. Kellerpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2001-03-22 · Published · cited 101× · 19 P.3d 1030
19 P.3d 1030 (2001) 143 Wash.2d 267 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Lawrence John KELLER, Petitioner. No. 68993-8. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued October 26, 2000. Decided March 22, 2001. *1032 Suzanne Lee Elliott, Seattle, amicus curiae on behalf of Washington Ass'n of C
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAVID D. COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 94-2576 KELLER INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-94-375) Argued: July 13, 1995 Decided: January 6, 1998 Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. ____________________
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 186 F. Supp. 3d 1297; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64104; 2016 WL 2858844
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, a number of North Florida farmers, claim that their watermelon crops *1298were damaged when plastic mulch manufactured by Defendant Poly Expert, Inc. degraded prematurely. ECF No. 61, at 6 ¶¶ 18-21. It turns out that the premature degradation may have bee
Anderson v. Austinpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994-06-07 · Published · cited 7× · 443 S.E.2d 737; 115 N.C. App. 134; 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 552
443 S.E.2d 737 (1994) Kenneth Allen ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Curtis Dale AUSTIN, Ronald Austin, and Frances Austin, Defendants. No. 9315SC648. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 7, 1994. *738 Hayes Hofler & Associates, P.A. by R. Hayes Hofler and Laurel E. Solomon, Durham, for plaintiff. Carruthers & Roth, P.A
Weaver v. Weachterpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993-11-19 · Published · cited 0× · 14 F.3d 51; 1993 WL 502184; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 32898
14 F.3d 51 Weaver (Ronald D.)v.Weachter (Paul), Hankins (Kenneth E.), Schrubert (Trooper),Martin (Attorney), Hawbaker (David), Walker(John), Keller (John), Antoun (Fred) NO. 92-7669 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Nov 19, 1993 Appeal From: M.D.Pa., Rambo, J.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996-08-20 · Published · cited 172× · 92 F.3d 1336; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21003; 1996 WL 469705
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge PHILLIPS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MOTZ joined. OPINION PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge: Ronald Bennett was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death by a Virginia jury. After exhausting his direct state appeals and unsuccessfully petitioning the Supre
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000-05-18 · Published · cited 5× · 17 S.W.3d 514; 2000 Ky. LEXIS 59; 2000 WL 652539
17 S.W.3d 514 (2000) Robert A. BRUSMAN, Executor of the Estate of Donna Sue Brusman, Deceased; Robert A. Brusman, Individually and Next Friend of Gregory Brusman, A Minor, Christopher Brusman, A Minor, and Michael Brusman, A Minor, Appellants, v. NEWPORT STEEL CORPORATION; Sheila C. Lowther, Administrative Law Judge; and Workers' Compensation Board, Appellees. No. 1999-SC-0430-WC. Supreme Court of Kent
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 401 U.S. App. D.C. 486; 685 F.3d 1110; 2012 WL 2892392; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14569
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 20, 2011 Decided July 17, 2012 No. 10-5153 MELVIN J. TAYLOR, APPELLANT v. EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CHAIRMAN, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of