Cases

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 290 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION IV integrity of this document No. CV-20-422 2023.06.28 15:11:10 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered June 2, 2021 DEVONA POWELL APPEAL FROM THE LAFAYE

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Stephanie Smith ) Docket No. 2016-08-0977 ) v. ) State File No. 67360-2016 ) TJ Maxx, et al. ) ) ) Appeal from the

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 159 Defendant-appellant Darren Leon Powell appeals from his jury convictions for possession of three times the bulk amount of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(6) with an accompanying firearm specification pursuant to R.C. 2941.141, traffickin

CHANDLER, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this appeal, the Internal Revenue Service of the United States (IRS) and the Mississippi State Tax Commission (Commission) both claim priority interests in the funds of an insolvent estate. The Chancery Court of Lee County found that the Commission’s claim had priority because the Commission had filed notices of tax lien and qualified as a “judgment lien creditor” under

126 Wn.2d 244 (1995) 893 P.2d 615 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. FORD POWELL, JR., Respondent. No. 61610-8. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. April 13, 1995. *247 David R. Needy, Prosecuting Attorney, K. Garl Long, Chief Deputy, and Corbin T. Volluz, Deputy, for petitioner.</

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0083p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0083p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE Plaintiffs have sued Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging as unconstitutional a broad swath of Indiana's statutory and regulatory restrictions on providing and obtaining abortions. Dkt. 1. Now before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice.

DOWNING, J. 13The issue in this appeal is whether defendants, Pointe Coupee Electric Membership Corporation and Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, (Pointe Cou-pee) can be held responsible for injuries to Randy Beach, Donald McGehee, and S. Paul Didier, (plaintiffs), employees of independent contractor, while performing a repair. The trial court granted Pointe Cou-pee’s motion for summary judgment and from that judg

787 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2011) Rochelle MANDELBAUM, individually and as executrix of The Estate of Donald Mandelbaum; Giuseppe Santinello; Anne J. Del Casino, and Robert and Stephanie Halio, on behalf of themselves and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FISERV, INC., Fiserv Trust Company, Retirement Accounts, Inc., NTC & Co. LLP, Trust Industrial Bank, and Lincoln Trust Company, Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 09-

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-KA-00946-SCT KENNETH MOORE, JR. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/15/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: LATRICE WESTBROOKS ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

1 2025 CO 28The People of the State of Colorado, Petitioners In the Interest of Minor Child: B.C.B.; and B.C.B., v. A.B. and J.S. Respondents No. 24SC539Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancMay 27, 2025 2 Certiorari

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES OF : No. 333 Common Pleas Judicial THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : Classification Docket THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : : ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2016, upon consideration of the Petitions of Sheila Woods-Skipper,

ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge. Stephanie Patterson made two separate requests for information from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. In complying with her requests, the IRS disclosed some responsive documents, withheld in full or in part other documents based upon certain statutory ex-' emptions, and reported that

502 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2007) Wendy MILLER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Danny Miller, et al., Plaintiffs, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07-21274-CIV-KING. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. August 17, 2007. *1266 Brenda S. Fulmer, Esq., Donald Guy

931 F.Supp. 773 (1996) Lillian D. DUDLEY, Pro Se, Clara L. Robertson, Aurelia Hart, Kumasi Mants, Lola Nowden, Melba Jean Easter, Caroline Glover, Twalla McCree, Calandra J. Cherry, Charlotte Hardy, Corey Crawford, Terri Howard-Stallworth, Stephanie Shields, Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 94-D-508-N, 94-D-531-N, 94-D-610-N, 94-D-629-N to 94-D-632-N, 94-D-638-N, 94-D-642-N, 94-D-643-N, 94-D

OPINION AND ORDER HAROLD BAER, JR., District Judge. Before this Court is a motion submitted by Defendants in two cases, 08 Civ. 5093 (the “Harborview” case) and 08 Civ. 8781 (the “RALI” case) (respectively, “Harborview Defendants” and “RALI Defendants”) to dismiss Intervenors’ claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77k. RALI Defendants also move for a temporary

COZORT, Judge. This appeal is from an Order of the Superior Court enforcing an arbitration award against general partners who were removed as partners while the arbitration proceeding was pending. We find that the former general partners were allowed to participate at the arbitration hearing, and we affirm the trial court’s Order. The facts follow. Plaintiff contracted to build an office building for defenda

851 F.Supp. 639 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. ATLAS MINERALS AND CHEMICALS, INC., et al. v. R. Emory MABRY, et al. Civ. A. No. 91-5118. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 1, 1994. *640 *641 *642

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.: *995 Tracy Hua and Chi Hung Mu, Appellants, appeal from the judgment in favor of Appellee, U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Certificateholders of the LXS 2007-7N Trust Fund ("U.S. Bank"). Upon review, we affirm. The trial court set forth the followi