⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kenneth P. Lanza”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 878 So. 2d 491; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11414; 2004 WL 1737095
PER CURIAM. Appellants, Dr. John Lanza (Lanza) and Attorney General, Charles Crist appeal the trial court’s non-final order denying Lan-za s motion to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, motion to transfer to St. Lucie County. We affirm. In this case, Appellees, Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc., sued Lanza and the Attorney General in a declaratory judgment action. Because the Attorney General was a party
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016-08-31 · Published · cited 4× · 90 Mass. App. Ct. 133; 56 N.E.3d 889
Rubin, J. The plaintiff 1 appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming a determination by the conservation commission of Wayland (commission) that there are wetlands on his property. 2 That determination was made under Wayland’s wetlands and water resou
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010-09-15 · Published · cited 0× · 45 So. 3d 1165; 2010 La.App. 4 Cir. 0540; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1237; 2010 WL 3584510
45 So.3d 1165 (2010) Ken and Inda KLEINSCHMIDT v. Louis J. LANZA III, Individually; and d/b/a Lan-Coast, L.L.C.; Craig Condon Individually; Lan-Coast L.L.C., A Limited Liability Corporation; and Lan-Coast L.L.C., A Partnership Between Louis J. Lanza, III and Craig Condon. No. 2010-CA-0540. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 15, 2010. Rehear
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
. ` .' " ' ‘ , //\§§Cl/I_l UL/OZ» . ,~ b c)§i.o\ . ` . . ', - ` 1 d l ©Q@HEQQF§M§DMPUENMS ‘ 4 v ~ . OCT 082015 ` H£UMZVH § ,K,J¢¢.)l¢.c F/zcll( 2/0,4/7/€;7_?/‘7/7 ¢;l¢/w all/4 ///z¢z /5,¢¢,€‘ /P/ /L/M/¢§ fig zw. 775/gx " 1 ,Mmé©@§a ©EN@E@M_ _ ' . , ' ` ©ATE:¢_§;U-==» EW/`:_j cl- .’ /WK§'JZ/. /N¢§W¥ 4 A'/zzek fo u/é faFCVQ/w/ bill ///’FZ/¢/; _@F//ZXIS _é§&§§z;§@y/ £//1//`2,[5//;17/»;¢ ' ` /Y¢/.;F»i/ \"/Qx/¢sj 75/7// x ’ ( §§ '» ‘Fé/'/Z`L /3¢//2 ///'/msz 55 ` r¢zé’
California Supreme Court · 2005-08-04 · Published · cited 97× · 116 P.3d 479; 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 5; 36 Cal. 4th 944; 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9387; 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6887; 2005 Cal. LEXIS 8586
32 Cal.Rptr.3d 5 (2005) 36 Cal.4th 944 116 P.3d 479 GRAFTON PARTNERS L.P., et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Alameda County, Respondent; PriceWaterhouseCoopers L.L.P., Real Party in Interest. No. S123344. Supreme Court of California. August 4, 2005. Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jero
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982-09-08 · Published · cited 38× · 687 F.2d 278
POOLE, Circuit Judge. The district court found and another panel of this court affirmed that in 1965 O. E. Serwold had purchased from the Estate of Neis Nelson, the appellant’s father, 36 shares of stock in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The district court computed damages as the difference between the price paid and the fair market value of t
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-08-24 · Published · cited 0× · 208 A.D.3d 812; 174 N.Y.S.3d 426; 2022 NY Slip Op 05051
South Nassau Med. Group, P.C. v 105 Rockaway Realty, LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 05051) South Nassau Med. Group, P.C. v 105 Rockaway Realty, LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 05051 Decided on August 24, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by Ne
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-07-21 · Published · cited 27× · 197 A.D.3d 144; 152 N.Y.S.3d 46; 2021 NY Slip Op 04484
Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 04484) Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. 2021 NY Slip Op 04484 Decided on July 21, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Dill
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988-04-12 · Published · cited 46× · 844 F.2d 81; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4826; 1988 WL 33147
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I regret that I am unable to join in Judge Winter’s innovative majority opinion. I am unable to do so because holding that proof of loss causation is a requisite element of an action under § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 is contrary to the language of the statute, legislative intent, and relevant precedent, including prior decisions of our Court. The
Plotkin v. Joekelpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 76× · 304 S.W.3d 455; 2009 WL 3152093
304 S.W.3d 455 (2009) Garry L. PLOTKIN, Appellant, v. Charles L. JOEKEL, Individually and d/b/a Trendsetter Staffing, Inc.; Texas Staffing Services, Inc. d/b/a Trendsetter Staffing; Kenneth Joekel, Individually and d/b/a America's Skilled Personnel; and F.W. Services, Inc., Appellees. Charles L. Joekel, Individually and d/b/a Trendsetter Staffing, Inc., and Kenneth Joekel, Individually and d/b/a America's Skilled Personnel, Appellants, v.
Wilson v. Lottpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2000-08-31 · Published · cited 3× · 65 S.W.3d 104; 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 6072; 2000 WL 1285421
ABATEMENT AND REMAND Kenneth Wilson Sr. and Lesa Wilson, individually and as next friend of Kenneth Wilson, Jr., (Wilsons) appeal from the trial court's orders granting separate motions for summary judgment of Carmen Lott and Montgomery County that the Wilsons take nothing on their personal injury action. By two issues, the Wilsons contend (1) the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment of Carmen Lott and Montgomery County, and
Bernstein v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989-02-15 · Published · cited 10× · 767 P.2d 958; 53 Wash. App. 456
53 Wn. App. 456 (1989) 767 P.2d 958 LOIS B. BERNSTEIN, Individually and as Personal Representative, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent. No. 11047-4-II. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two. February 15, 1989. James A. Lanza and Joseph J. Lanza, for appellant. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney G
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001-06-06 · Published · cited 6× · 146 N.H. 474; 773 A.2d 649; 2001 N.H. LEXIS 98
BRODERICK, j. The petitioner, Scott L. McIntosh, appeals an order of the Hillsborough County Probate Court (Cloutier, J.) awarding the respondent, David McIntosh, the proceeds of their father’s individual retirement account (IRA). We affirm. The record supports the following facts. In 1978, Roy McIntosh (decedent) suffered a serious stroke that physically disabled him until his death in 1996. In 1990, he opened
District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995-09-12 · Published · cited 5× · 207 B.R. 752; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21717; 1995 WL 916972
207 B.R. 752 (1995) JOHN HUGH SHANNON, P.A., and Lauren J. Strickland, Appellants, v. Kenneth I. STRICKLAND, Appellee. No. 93-1393-CIV-T-24(A). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 12, 1995. John H. Shannon, P.A., Lakeland, FL, pro se. John H. Shannon, P.A., Lakeland, FL, for Lauren Strickland. Matthew J. Kovschak, John
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 2× · 2016 NY Slip Op 8499; 145 A.D.3d 851; 44 N.Y.S.3d 138
In an action, inter alia, in effect, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff’s mortgage on the subject property is valid, and to compel the defendant R.V.P. Associates, LLC, to execute a duplicate original of a deed to the subject property and all documents necessary to record the deed, in which the defendant R.V.P. Associates, LLC, counterclaimed for a judgment vacating the mortgage of record, the defendant R
Washington Supreme Court · 1986-06-12 · Published · cited 36× · 720 P.2d 831; 106 Wash. 2d 84; 1986 Wash. LEXIS 1208
106 Wn.2d 84 (1986) 720 P.2d 831 DON M. CLARK, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE HORSE RACING COMMISSION, ET AL, Respondents. No. 51942-1. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. June 12, 1986. Williams, Lanza, Kastner & Gibbs, by Randy J. Aliment and Joseph J. Lanza, for appellants. *86
Weiss v. Grolmanpublic domain
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012-05-30 · Published · cited 1× · 30 Mass. L. Rptr. 295
Fabricant, Judith, J. INTRODUCTION This action presents a claim of legal malpractice. Before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss, on the grounds that the claims are the subject of a prior pending action and are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. For the reasons that will be explained, the motion will be allowed, and the action will be ordered dismissed. BACKGROUN
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987-12-10 · Published · cited 45× · 835 F.2d 249; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16168; 1987 WL 21160
*250 WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge. Defendant Gourley was convicted by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C. Append. § 1202(a) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. That statute prohibited possession by a convicted felon of any firearm transported in or affecting comm
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1993-07-12 · Published · cited 2× · 160 B.R. 675; 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 182; 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1005; 1993 WL 260729
160 B.R. 675 (1993) In re Kenneth I. STRICKLAND, Debtor. Kenneth I. STRICKLAND, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HUGH SHANNON, P.A. and Lauren J. Strickland, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 91-14853-8P7, Adv. No. 92-522. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 12, 1993. *676 Matthew J. Kovschak, Bartow, FL, for plaint
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04454
Berliner v Scherzer (2025 NY Slip Op 04454) Berliner v Scherzer 2025 NY Slip Op 04454 Decided on July 30, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is u