⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Kenneth P Menno”

South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009-08-26 · Published · cited 6× · 2009 SD 78; 772 N.W.2d 170; 2009 S.D. 78; 2009 S.D. LEXIS 151
2009 SD 78 DAKOTA PLAINS AG CENTER, LLC, and NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. MARCIA SMITHEY, as personal representative of the Estate of Edward Smithey, Defendant and Appellant. No. 24976 Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued March 24, 2009 Opinion Filed August 26, 2009. MARK J. ARNDT of May & Johnson, P.C. Sioux Falls, Sou
State v. Otobhialepublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2022-06-15 · Published · cited 7× · 976 N.W.2d 759; 2022 S.D. 35
#29664-a-SPM 2022 S.D. 35 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DESTINY OTOBHIALE, Defendant and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
State v. Hoferpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008-11-12 · Published · cited 2× · 2008 SD 109; 757 N.W.2d 790; 2008 S.D. LEXIS 151; 2008 WL 4886706
2008 SD 109 STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES RAY HOFER and KARLA KRISTINE HOFER d/b/a Hofer's Used Cars, LLC, Defendants and Appellants. No. 24718. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Opinion Filed November 12, 2008. Considered on Briefs on May 19, 2008. LAWRENCE E. LONG, Attorney General, JOHN M. STROHMAN, Assistant Attorney Gener
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997-03-26 · Published · cited 20× · 1997 SD 33; 561 N.W.2d 666; 1997 S.D. LEXIS 33; 1997 WL 136412
561 N.W.2d 666 (1997) 1997 SD 33 John and Gloria WILDEBOER, as conservators of Jonathan Wildeboer, a minor, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The SOUTH DAKOTA JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC.; George R. Fink d/b/a The Bar; Bill Debondt d/b/a Bill's Bar; Dennis Eliason d/b/a The Only One Lounge; Burt's Lounge, Inc.; and John Doe d/b/a The Wheel, Defendants and Appellees. No. 19461. S
State v. Gehmpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999-06-30 · Published · cited 17× · 1999 SD 82; 600 N.W.2d 535
600 N.W.2d 535 (1999) 1999 SD 82 STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Tammra Ranee GEHM, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20459. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs December 3, 1998. Decided June 30, 1999. *536 Mark W. Barnett, Attorney General, Gay Klima Tollefson
Ward v. Langepublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996-09-04 · Published · cited 67× · 1996 SD 113; 553 N.W.2d 246; 1996 S.D. LEXIS 119
553 N.W.2d 246 (1996) 1996 SD 113 Gary WARD, as Agent of the Estate of Walter O'Keefe, Deceased, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Gail LANGE and Loren Lange, Defendants and Appellants. No. 19295. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs May 23, 1996. Decided September 4, 1996. *247 De
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012-10-25 · Published · cited 3× · 382 S.W.3d 835; 2012 Ky. LEXIS 175; 2012 WL 5285697
SCOTT, J., dissenting: I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the Kentucky Constitution unquestionably affords greater protection to the free exercise of religion than does the Federal Constitution. Accordingly, any law interfering with an individual’s free exercise of religion must pass strict scrutiny or else be declared unconstitutional. Given that KRS 189.820 cannot pass strict scrutiny, Appellants’ convict
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994-06-29 · Published · cited 3× · 518 N.W.2d 749; 1994 S.D. LEXIS 88
518 N.W.2d 749 (1994) INTERSTATE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC., Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Appellee, and BROOKINGS TELEPHONE COMPANY, A DIVISION OF BROOKINGS MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, Intervenor and Appellee. No. 18182. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs on October 6, 1993. Reassigned April 12, 1994
District Court, C.D. California · 2016-06-24 · Published · cited 1× · 192 F. Supp. 3d 1080; 2016 WL 3524330
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSING DISQUALIFICATION Andrew J. Guilford, United States District Judge This matter concerns whether a lawyer can represent—at the same time, in the same litigation, in the same courthouse—a criminal and his victim. Being a defendant—particularly a criminal one—can be lonely. As a society, we don’t require a defendant’s friends to stand
South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997-03-26 · Published · cited 3× · 1997 SD 33
Unified Judicial System Formatting courtesy of the State Bar of South Dakotaand South Dakota Continuing Legal Education, Inc.222 East Capitol Ave.Pierre, SD 57501 JOHN WILDEBOER and GLORIA WILDEBOER,as conservators of Jonathan Wildeboer, a minor,Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.THE SOUTH DAKOTA JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC.,George R. Fink d/b/a
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00446-CV 7820211 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS