Cases

ACCEPTED 01-12-01108-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/22/2015 4:21:32 PM

BROWN, Judge. [1] Jill, Roeland, Jaymie and Jordyn Polet, et al., appeal the trial court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment filed by ESG Security, Inc. (“ESG”), and raise three issues which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of ESG. 1 We affirm.

Cite as 2021 Ark. 92 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 22, 2021 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2021 ANNUAL ATTORNEY- LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2021 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2021. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an automatic suspension on th

Cite as 2022 Ark. 94 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 21, 2022 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2022 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PERCURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2022 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2022. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached

102 F.Supp. 828 (1951) SCHNORBACH v. KAVANAGH, Collector of Internal Revenue. No. 1162. United States District Court W. D. Michigan, S. D. December 17, 1951. *829 Harrington, Waer, Cary & Servaas and Oscar E. Waer, all of Grand Rapids, Mich., for plaintiff. Joseph F. Deeb, U. S. Atty., Kenneth P. Hansma, Asst. U. S. At

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DARNELL T. HINES, No. 15-16145 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:13-cv-00357- AWI-JLT ASHRAFE E. YOUSEFF, M.D.; GODWIN C. UGUEZE, M.D.; JOSHUA GARZA, RNP; M. AGUIRRE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States Di

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior District Judge JAMES E. DOYLE with whom Circuit Judge WILKEY concurs. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge STARR. JAMES E. DOYLE, Senior District Judge: Samuel Friedman appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia denying his motions to compel the Commodities Future Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Sec

218 S.W.3d 671 (2006) The COCA-COLA COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. HARMAR BOTTLING COMPANY et al., Respondents. No. 03-0737. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 9, 2004. Decided October 20, 2006. Rehearing Denied May 4, 2007. *674 Robert Harrison Pemberton, Austin, Orrin L. Harrison III, Dav

Barry S. Glass and Shirley P. Glass, et al., 1 Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentGlass v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 13278-78, 4054-79, 5544-79, 5649-79, 7605-79, 7692-79, 8146-79, 8147-79, 8148-79, 8150-7

206 Ga. 497 (1950) 57 S.E.2d 597 DODD et al v. MADARIS et al. 16977. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 13, 1950. Gleason & Painter, for plaintiffs in error. Shaw & Shaw, contra. CANDLER, Justice. J. M. Madaris and others, individually and as trustees of a named church, brought a suit in Walker Super

*1308 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.............................................................1308 II. Procedural History.......................................................1310 III. Evidentiary Background..................................................1311 A. Texas Demography Related to Redistri

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

986 F.Supp. 1036 (1997) Lloyd PAYNE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James A. COLLINS, et al., Defendants. No. 9:95CV413 (TH). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division. June 25, 1997. *1037 *1038 *1039 *1040

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge. The thirteen cases involved in this multidistrict securities litigation are before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to certify a defendant class of underwriters.1 Previous to this motion and by stipulation of the parties, plaintiffs amended their uniformly stated complaints to add Bacon, Whipple & Co. as a defenda

ACCEPTED 15-25-00084-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/3/2025 3:01 PM No. 15-25-00084-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 06-15-00013-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/16/2015 4:49:55 PM

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

77 B.R. 843 (1987) In re INDEPENDENT CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. In re UNIVERSAL CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, aka National Clearing House Company, a Trust, Debtor. In re ACCOUNTING SERVICES COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. Robert D. MERRILL, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. David ABBOTT, et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. Nos. C-84-0927W, C-84-0928J and consolidated ca

JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge. The United States, in order to house wartime workers in the Kaiser Shipyards, condemned land situated in the Peninsula Drainage District and therein erected the City of Vanport, which was wholly owned by the United States. The location was entirely surrounded by enbankments and was washed on three sides by the floodwaters of the Columbia River. On May 30, 1948, the river, then at a flood height