Cases

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Elvie L. Riggins appeals the district court’s 1 judgment which affirmed the denial of his application for social security disability benefits, see 42 U.S.C. § 423 (1994), and supplemental security income, see 42 U.S.C. § 1381(a) (1994). We affirm. </

173 F.3d 704 61 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 472 Roger PIERCE, Appellant,v.Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social SecurityAdministration, Appellee. No. 98-2139. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1998.Filed April 20, 1999. E. Gregory Wallace, Bules Creek,

909 P.2d 514 (1995) David E. GRAVEN, Petitioner, v. VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent. No. 94SC416. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. December 18, 1995. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 16, 1996. *515 Kenneth Dresner, Colorado Springs, for Petitioner. White & Steele, P.C., John M. Lebsack,

OPINION DAMICH, Judge: Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in this “rails-to-trails” case. Plaintiffs allege a Fifth Amendment taking of their properties which were subject to a railroad right-of-way along two segments of a corridor running from Lowell, Michigan, to Greenville, Michigan, in Kent, Ionia, and Montcalm counties. Pursuant

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Donald Bryant, Sr. (Mr. Bryant), appeals the district court’s 2 grant of summary judgment to the Social Security Administration, affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny his application for children’s Supplemental Security Insurance (SSI) disability benefits on behalf of his son, Donald Brya

Appellate Case: 20-3172 Document: 010110716257 Date Filed: 07/26/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 26, 2022 Christ

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

1 Reported in 106 P.2d 737. This case involves a petition for a change in the amount of allowance made to plaintiff in a divorce case for alimony and the support of children, and for the division of property commonly owned by plaintiff and defendant. The case was tried to the court, and decrees were entered reducing the amount provided in the interlocutory decree for alimony and suppor

This case involves the question of the effect of acts fully performed by the board of county commissioners and county treasurer of Creek county, under article 14, ch. 66, S. L. 1937, prior to the decision in Ivester v. State, 183 Okla. 519,83 P.2d 193, adjudging the act to be unconstitutional. The action was commenced by the state on the relation of three owners of taxable property in the city of Drumright on which t

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM