Cases

913 N.E.2d 255 (2009) David J. FITZPATRICK d/b/a David J. Fitzpatrick and Associates, Appellant-Cross/Defendant, v. KENNETH J. ALLEN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellee-Cross/Plaintiff. No. 64A03-0811-CV-545. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 10, 2009. *258 Michael A. Wilkins, Brian J. Paul, Jenny R. Wright, Ice Miller, LLP, Indi

FOR THE RESPONDENT FOR THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION Karl L. Mulvaney Donald R. Lundberg, Executive Secretary Indianapolis, Indiana 115 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA IN THE MATTER OF )

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This case stems from the wrongful conviction of two brothers, both teenaged boys with severe intellectual disabilities, for the rape and murder of an 11 year old girl in 1983. Henry McCollum and Leon Brown ("Appellees") spent 31 years in prison and on death row 1 before being exonerated based on DNA evidence linking another individual, a man who was k

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. This case arises out of a verbal and physical altercation between Stanley Joseph and Latavia Jones and Joseph’s subsequent arrest on an assault charge. Joseph appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of arresting officers Kenneth

14 F.3d 598NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ngaire Evelyn VINCENT, Appellant,Alfred J. VINCENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.REYNOLDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED: Andrew J. Barger,Md; Kenneth J. Allen; Norman

THIRD DIVISION ELLINGTON, P. J., DOYLE, P.J. and MILLER J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ April 29, 201

783 N.E.2d 1118 (2002) In the Matter of Kenneth J. ALLEN. No. 64S00-9907-DI-401. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 13, 2002. Order Denying Stay October 18, 2002. Karl L. Mulvaney, Indianapolis, IN, for the Respondent. Donald R. Lundberg, Executive Secretary, Indianapolis, IN, for the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. DI

PER CURIAM: By order of May 9, 1983, we held this appeal in abeyance pending a decision by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals on the validity of the parties’ settlement agreement. Because that court has now let stand the state circuit court decision invalidating the settlement agreement,

Per Curiam. Appellant challenges the trial court's order dismissing his action against Appellees *72in which he alleged that he was wrongfully disciplined at his correctional institution. The court dismissed the action with prejudice for a number of reasons, including the failure to state a cause of action for damages in tort, the untimeliness of

WOOD, Chief Judge. The Supreme Court’s.decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), might seem a bit strange to someone who thought that the adversary system in criminal cases allows each side to adopt a “no holds barred” litigation stance. But that is not the .way the Constitution structures criminal procedure. From the Fi

BOGGS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MERRITT, RYAN, ALAN E. NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, JJ„ joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 976-979), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment, in which BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., C.J., joined. CLAY, J. (pp.. 979-988), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which MOORE and COLE, JJ., joined. OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 304-08), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant, Kenneth Eugene Allen, appeals from the judgment entered by the district court following his conditional guilty plea to drug related crimes, wherein Defendant reserved his right unde

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Angela Brady-Morris and Denise Brady (“Brady’s daughters”) appeal the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s declaration that the debtor Kenneth Allen Knight Trust (“Trust”) is a “business trust” and therefore entitled to bankruptcy protection. Brady’s daughters argue that the b

607 F.3d 749 (2010) Kenneth Glenn THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Richard F. ALLEN, Respondent-Appellant. No. 09-12869. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 27, 2010. *750 J. Clayton Crehshaw, Beth Jackson Hughes, Montgomery, AL, for Allen. Jerome T. Wolf, Teresa A. Ascencio, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosen

78 So.3d 841 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Generio ALLEN. No. 2011-KA-0693. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. November 23, 2011. *842 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Michael Redmann, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for Appellant. Kenneth J. Beck, Gretna, LA, for Appellee. (Court

83 So.3d 1160 (2012) STATE of Louisiana v. Generio ALLEN. No. 2011-KA-0693. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. January 4, 2012. Amended Order January 20, 2012. *1161 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Michael Redmann, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for Appellant, State of Louisi

Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: On October 8, 2009, Appellants filed a law suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia claiming that the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) had unlawfully denied their requests for permits to import hunting trophies taken from elephant hun

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. Kenneth M. Allen appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket No. CH035S960993-I-1, affirming the action of the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in connection with denial of a job opportunity that arose during his absence for military service. 1 We conclu

TOBIAS, J., dissents and assigns reasons. | ]This matter was returned to us by the Louisiana Supreme Court to be heard by a five-judge panel, the Court specifically holding, citing La. Const, art. V, § 8(B), that a matter involving a bail bond is civil in nature and can be decided by a trial court having only criminal jurisdiction. State v. Allen, 11-2843 (La.4/13/12), 84 So.3d 1288.1</

ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Clements and McCullar’s Motion to Dismiss Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [Docket No. 14]. The Court’s jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiffs are inmates in the Colorado Department of Corrections (“CDOC”) who have been sentenced to indeterminate terms of imprisonment under the Col