Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kenneth Gentry”
Kenneth Gentry v. Mark Sevierpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-3574 K ENNETH E. G ENTRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M ARK R. S EVIER, Superintendent of the Miami Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South
Gentry, Charles v. Arapazuma, Inc.public domain
FILED Apr 27, 2022 03:26 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Gentry, Charles v. Arapazuma, Inc.public domain
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Charles Gentry, ) Docket No. 2019-06-2140 Employee, ) V. ) Arapazuma, Inc., ) State File No. 196998-2019 Employer, ) And ) Continental Nat’] Ins. Co., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. ) EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY DISABILITY BENEFITS This case came before the Court on July 8, 2020. The sole issue is Charles Gentry’s request for temporary disability benefits from
Gary Gentry v. Orkin, LLCpublic domain
Lisa White Hardwick, Judge Orkin, LLC, and one of its branch managers, Danny Biron, appeal the circuit court’s order denying their motion to compel arbitration of former Orkin employee Gary Gentry’s retaliation claim against them. Orkin and Biron contend the court should have compelled arbitration because there is an enforceable arbitration agreement between the parties, the agr
Gentry v. Sevierpublic domain
597 F.3d 838 (2010) Kenneth E. GENTRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark R. SEVIER, Superintendent of the Miami Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-3574. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 10, 2009. Decided February 26, 2010. *842 Paul H. Tzur (argued), Skadden, Arps, Slat
Gentry v. Statepublic domain
SHEPARD, Chief Justice. Appellant Kenneth Gentry filed a petition for post-conviction relief, and the Marion Superior Court denied it. He sought review in the Court of Appeals, but his efforts to perfect his appeal were delayed while he awaited preparation of the record. The Court of Appeals granted Gentry two extensions of time in which to file the ree-ord. When the second extension expired without the record being filed,
*562MANION, Circuit Judge, dissenting. My colleagues have found that it was inappropriate on these facts to have granted summary judgment against Kenneth Gentry on his access to courts claim. And it may be true that Gentry’s rights were violated if he can show that he was denied certain scribe materials that were necessary to allow him to conform to the p
Gentry v. Statepublic domain
770 S.W.2d 780 (1988) Kenneth GENTRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 69869. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. November 23, 1988. Rehearing Denied December 14, 1988. Certiorari Denied June 5, 1989. *783 Thomas W. Whitlock, on appeal only, and Richard S. Podgorski, Dento
Gentry v. Yoncepublic domain
337 S.C. 1 (1999) 522 S.E.2d 137 Mary GENTRY and Ralph Bryan, Appellants, v. Kenneth M. YONCE, d/b/a, Yonce's Stop N Shop; Shirley Fincher, formerly d/b/a, Star Stop N Shop; Walter M. Fulmer, d/b/a, Fulmer's Amoco; Joseph A. Rhinehart, d/b/a, Country Peddler and The Country Peddler; H & S Amusements, Inc.; William Gordon Silver and James Harold Matthews, d/b/a, H & S Amusements; and Willard Britton, d/b/a, Associat
Gentry v. Statepublic domain
586 N.E.2d 860 (1992) Kenneth E. GENTRY, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Respondent. No. 49A04-9105-PC-159. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. January 21, 1992. Kenneth E. Gentry, pro se. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee-respondent. CONOVER, Judge. Ap
Gentry ex rel. Estate of Gentry v. Milliken & Co.public domain
Goolsby, Judge: The dispositive issue in this wrongful death action brought by Debbie B. Gentry, Administratrix of the Estate of David W. Gentry, against Milliken & Company is whether David W. Gentry, an employee of Sanders Brothers, Inc., was Milliken’s statutory employee when he was fatally injured at Milliken’s Magnolia Plant while assisting in the installation of scouring machinery. The circuit court granted Milliken’
Gentry v. Blackpublic domain
Banke, Presiding Judge. The Supreme Court, in Gentry v. Black, 256 Ga. 569 (351 SE2d 188) (1987), having reversed the decision of this court in Gentry v. Black, 178 Ga. App. 284 (342 SE2d 729) (1986), the prior judgment of *680this court is vacated, and, in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, the judgment of the trial court is hereby a
Gentry v. General Motors Corp.public domain
HOWERTON, Judge. Scott Gentry, Linda Gentry, and Meridian Insurance Company appeal from an order nunc pro tunc dismissing their products liability action. They argue that the trial judge abused his discretion by excluding the testimony of their expert witnesses. We agree and reverse. The error occurred prior to a retrial following a previous appeal. The Gentrys also argue that admissibility of their experts’ testimony is the
Gentry v. Blackpublic domain
178 Ga. App. 284 (1986) 342 S.E.2d 729 GENTRY et al. v. BLACK. 72080. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 28, 1986. Rehearing Denied March 14, 1986. Norman S. Fletcher, Kenneth D. Bruce, Ronald R. Womack, for appellants. William David Cunningham, for appellee. BANKE, Chief Judge. A
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Kenneth Pike Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, of Gentry Cornerstone Bankpublic domain
FAGG, Circuit Judge. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (Lloyd’s) appeals the district court’s order holding Lloyd’s liable for the face value of its insurance policy and Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Gentry (FMIC) not liable to Kenneth Pike after two poultry houses burned down. We reverse and remand. At the time of the fire, Pike held insurance poli
People v. Gentrypublic domain
157 Ill. App.3d 899 (1987) 510 N.E.2d 963 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STANLEY GENTRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 84-2718. Illinois Appellate Court First District (4th Division). Opinion filed June 18, 1987. Steven Clark, of State Appellate Defender's Office, and Sachnoff, Weaver & Rubenstein, Ltd., both of
Gentry, Charles v. Arapazuma, Inc.public domain
FILED Jul 19, 2022 01:34 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Gentry v. McKnight Construction Co.public domain
A motion for summary judgment was sustained and a judgment entered in the 8th Judicial District Court of Hunt County that Kenneth Gentry take nothing in his suit against McKnight Construction Company. The original judgment entered was superseded by a nunc pro tunc judgment. Gentry has perfected an appeal from the latter. Previous to the summary judgment in Hunt County, the record shows that as next friend of his six year old son, Kenneth Dwayne Gentry, and in his individual cap
Trunnell v. Gentrypublic domain
WALTERS, Chief Judge. This matter is on appeal from an order entered by the trial court terminating the right of the Trunnells to exercise an option to purchase certain real property from the estate of Iola M. Doramus, deceased. We reverse. In August, 1974, the Trunnells and Mrs. Doramus executed a written lease agreement allowing the Trunnells to farm property owned by Mrs. Doramus in Canyon Coun
Hinkle v. Gentrypublic domain
529 F.Supp.2d 281 (2008) Scott HINKLE, Plaintiff v. Robert GENTRY, et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 06-10179-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 9, 2008. Scott Hinkle, Saratoga Springs, NY, Pro se. John P. McLafferty, Day Pitney LLP, Boston, MA, Jeffrey A. Fritz, Day Pitney LLP, Victoria Woodin Chavey, Day, Berry & Howard LLP, Hartfor