Cases

714 F.Supp. 196 (1989) Robert PLOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Richard CHENEY, Secretary of Defense; John O. Marsh, Secretary of the Army; and Army Morale Welfare Recreation Fund, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-00073-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. June 5, 1989. *197 Kenneth E. Labowitz, Fagelson, Schonberg

698 F.Supp. 627 (1988) Robert PLOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, the Army Moral Support Fund, and Col. Ernest Isbell, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-0795-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 19, 1988. *628 John N. Hauser, Gilmur R. Murray, Eli W. Gould, McCutchen, Doyl

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1586 Filed April 28, 2021 JULIE A. KRAFT, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. LARRY KRAFT, KENNETH KRAFT, DOUGLAS KRAFT, DONALD HIRSCHMAN, DAVID HIRSCHMAN, MYRON HIRSCHMAN, and FRANK HIRSCHMAN, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Plymouth County, Tod Deck, Judge.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00568-CV Scott Kenneth Higley, Appellant v. Elesa Jo Jorgensen, Appellee FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-23-006671, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

120 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 148 (1988) 548 A.2d 368 Charles W. Crankshaw, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (County of Allegheny), Respondents. No. 984 C.D. 1987. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on briefs June 14, 1988. September 29, 1988. Submitted on briefs June 14, 1988, to President Judge CRUMLI

OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION This appeal arises from a suit affecting the parent-child relationship (SAPCR), which was referred by agreed order to an associate judge for a final hearing. In five issues, Appellant Sanford J. Marks complains that the trial court erred by failing to make a record of the proceedings a

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. *728 This case involves a law firm's quantum-meruit suit for the reasonable value of its services in assisting its client reach a comprehensive settlement of various lawsuits filed against him. We must decide whether Texas Government Code s

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 25–0559 Submitted March 25, 2026—Filed May 1, 2026 Lisa Boggess, as administrator of the Estate of Brent Boggess and as next friend to minors Z.B. and J.B.; Drake L. Boggess; and Kim Buttshaw, Appellants, vs. City of Waterloo and Kenneth Schaff,

573 F.Supp. 479 (1983) COUNTY OF ERIE, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and 3rd Party Plaintiff, v. Patricia Ann SANTAFEMIA, 3rd Party Defendant. Civ. A. No. 83-76 ERIE. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. October 20, 1983. *480 Kenneth Chestek, Erie, Pa., for plaintiff. Jack

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/02/2024 09:08 AM CST - 880 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 315 Nebraska Reports ZEILER V. REIFSCHNEIDER Cite as 315 Neb. 880 Michael Zeiler, appellee, v. Kenneth E. Reifsch

ORDER DUFFY, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Party. For the reasons set forth herein, the court grants Plaintiffs motion. *343 BACKGROUND John Crago (“Crago” or “Plaintiff’) owns real property located in Beaufort County, Sou

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision because Lancaster has not overcome AEDPA’s very high standard to establish that the Michigan Court of Appeals’s determination was an unreasonable application of or contrary to Supreme Court precedent. Before obtaining habeas relief from a federal court, “a state prisoner must show that the state court’s ruling on th

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-0939 Filed November 7, 2018 LAUREN SHERRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SPECIALISTS, P.C., Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mark D. Cleve, Judge. A patient appeals a malpractice verdict in favor of her medical providers,

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. These are cross-appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Plaintiffs, trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Pension Plans and Trusts, (“Trustees”) brought suit under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (1982) and the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e) (1982), alleging that the defendant, Consolid

Opinion of the Court by Special Justice MARK C. WHITLOW. This case involves the interpretation of the Kentucky Sexual Offender Registration Act which was in effect in 2001. The Kentucky General Assembly subsequently Nas amended this Act, in part, to clarify some of the issues raised in this ease. On November 12, 1999, Appellee, Kenneth McBride (hereinafter referred to as “McBride”), was convicted in a Tennes

OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Circuit Judge. David Jones (appellant), an attorney, appeals from the order of the district court dated August 22, 1989, denying his motion for recusal of the district judge and for reconsideration of the allowance of attorneys’ fees and expenses against him. I This court views a motion characterized as a motion for reconsideration a

468 S.E.2d 649 (1996) Roger D. ROWE and Mitchalene Rowe, Respondents, v. Ken HYATT and Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., d/b/a Ken Hyatt Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., Petitioners. No. 24395. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard February 8, 1996. Decided March 25, 1996. Rehearing Denied April 18, 1996. Kenneth W. Ebener and S. Jahue Moo

572 N.W.2d 276 (1997) In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lewis M. KOSS, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota. No. C2-96-2024. Supreme Court of Minnesota. December 11, 1997. Kenneth L. Jorgensen, Office of Lawyers Prof. Responsibility, St. Paul, for petitioner. Lewis M. Koss, Florence, CO, pro se. Considered and decided by the court en banc

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H