Cases

McMlLLIAN, Judge. Ken Barnett appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss this defamation action filed by Holt Builders, LLC (“Holt”). For the reasons set forth below, we find that the motion to dismiss should have been granted and reverse. *292 Before addressin

GREENE, J., dissenting, in which HARRELL, J., joins. Respectfully, I dissent. The detectives in this case, McShane and Crystal, only had an “unparticularized suspicion or hunch” when they stopped Petitioner Jamar Holt (“Petitioner” or “Mr. Holt”). See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1883, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 909 (1968). Their “hunch” never reached the level of reasonable suspicion, and it is f

JAMES R. EYLER (Retired, specially assigned), J. On January 13, 2012, Jamar Holt, appellee, was charged with assault, firearms violations, and drug conspiracy charges. Appellee filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the investigatory stop leading to these charges. After a hearing on March 2 and 5, 2012, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City granted in part and denied in part appellee’s motion to suppress.

422 B.R. 778 (2010) In re Ray W. HOLT, Debtor. No. 3:08-bk-4288-PMG. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. January 14, 2010. *779 C. Kenneth Weaver, The Weaver Law Group, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Debtor. Meghan R. Applegate, Raymond R. Magley, Smith Hulsey & Busey, Jacksonville, FL, for Truste

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Kenneth Fisher pled guilty to an Arkansas bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court sentenced him to 150 months imprisonment after applying a two-level enhancement to the United States Sentencing Guidelines offense level for using a minor to commit the crime. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing. I. Backgro

Concurrence by Judge GRABER OPINION LUCERO, Circuit Judge: In Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 124 S.Ct. 2739, 159 L.Ed.2d 718 (2004), the Supreme Court held that the foreign country exception to the Federal . Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) “bars all claims based on any injury suffered in a foreign country.” Id. at 712, 124 S.Ct. 2739. The Court left unanswered, h

AMENDED ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. The following is the court’s opinion and order after trial. In this case the plaintiffs allege medical malpractice on the part of United States *1115Air Force medical personnel. (Amended) Pretrial Conference Order (Final), Undisputed Facts (“Facts”) (ECF No. 82) ¶ 1.

McCULLOUGH, Judge. Plaintiff Jeffrey S. Caudill appeals from the trial court's order which denied his motion for a new trial. A brief summary of the facts which gives rise to this dispute are listed below. On 15 April 1999, plaintiff's vehicle was stopped at a traffic signal on Holden Road, in Greensboro, North Carolina. Ellen Odoom operated the vehicle that was stopped behind plaintiff. As the vehicles waited at t

OPINION EHRLICH, Judge. ¶ 1 Kenneth V. Holt seeks special action relief, claiming that he is being wrongfully incarcerated for contempt of court because he refuses to undergo a psychosexual evaluation to be used in a legal determination of whether he is a sexually violent person. For the reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction and deny relief. ¶ 2 Holt was convicted of child molestation

02/27/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 3, 2025 KENNETH KELLY ET AL. v. THOMAS A. STEWART Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. MC-CH-CV-CD-20-20 Ben Dean, Chancellor _____________________________

751 F.Supp.2d 876 (2010) Laura PENDERGEST-HOLT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON and Arch Specialty Insurance Co., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-3712. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 13, 2010. *878 Lee Howard Shidlofsky, Alan M. Cohen, Douglas Paul Skelley, V

776 N.E.2d 361 (2002) Helen HOLT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of William Miller, III, Deceased, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. QUALITY MOTOR SALES, INC., Appellee-Defendant. No. 34A02-0202-CV-164. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 20, 2002. Publication Ordered October 3, 2002. *362 Desiree E. Bannasch, De

277 Kan. 536 (2004) 86 P.3d 1012 KIMBERLYN D. HOLT, a minor, by and through KIMBERLY R. HOLT and KENNETH F. HOLT, Her Parents, Natural Guardians, and Next Friends, and KIMBERLY R. HOLT and KENNETH F. HOLT, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. WESLEY MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, a Kansas Corporation, D/B/A WESLEY MEDICAL CENTER; WICHITA CENTER FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC., a Kansas Corporation; BENJAMIN J. HARRIS, M.D.; CLIFFORD S.

574 S.E.2d 6 (2002) NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff v. Julie S.F. HOLT, Defendant. No. COA01-1439. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 19, 2002. *7 Caudle & Spears, P.A. by Harold C. Spears and C. Grainger Pierce, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant. Kenneth L. Holland, P.A.

669 F.Supp. 751 (1987) Virginia E. HOLT, formerly Virginia June Earley Gosey, and Cecil T. Holt, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 86-0114-L. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. June 19, 1987. Theodore J. Craddock, George L. Mason, Caskie Frost Hobbs Thompson Knakal & Alford, Lynchburg, Va., for plaintif

[Cite as State v. Holt, 2020-Ohio-6649.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-19-1226 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201901424 v. Arron D. Holt DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant De

Cite as 2025 Ark. 96 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-24-762 Opinion Delivered: May 29, 2025 KENNETH SLOCUM APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH DIVISION V. [NO. 60CR-93-2979]

Brock, J. The defendant, Kenneth G. Holt, was convicted by a jury on an indictment charging conspiracy to commit arson, RSA 629:3, and was sentenced by the Superior Court (Johnson, J.) to a term of one and one-half to three years in the State prison. The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to prove all the elements of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

[J-64-2021] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT BAER, C.J., TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 789 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of : Sent

317 S.W.3d 225 (2010) James L. HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 93722. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. August 10, 2010. Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before: ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and