⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

19 opinions for “Kenneth A Douthat”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990-04-10 · Published · cited 11× · 900 F.2d 197; 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2104; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5184; 1990 WL 39494
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Bay Area Typographical Union No. 21 (the Union), Sharmaine Dyson, and Dale Spencer (collectively appellants) brought this action to enforce a purported contract between the Union and Alameda Newspapers, Inc. (Alameda). Appellants claimed that there was an agreement under which Dyson and Spencer kept their seniority and other rights, even though they had
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998-01-22 · Published · cited 26× · 132 F.3d 1123
*1126 AMENDED OPINION PER CURIAM. Tommy Williams filed suit against the defendants, The Nashville Network (“TNN”) and its parent company, Gaylord Entertainment Company, pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. Williams; a black man, alleged that TNN’s failure to inte
Adams v. Roarkpublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985-03-04 · Published · cited 18× · 686 S.W.2d 73; 1985 Tenn. LEXIS 484
686 S.W.2d 73 (1985) Jake B. ADAMS, Appellant, v. Charles ROARK, d/b/a Cherokee Dragway, and Cherokee Dragway, Inc., Appellees. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. March 4, 1985. *74 Jim W. Stambaugh, Kenneth E. Douthat, Stambaugh and Associates, Morristown, for appellant. David W. Blankenship, Kingsport, for appellees. <
District Court, C.D. California · 1999-05-26 · Published · cited 4× · 56 F. Supp. 2d 1095; 48 ERC (BNA) 1928; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8912; 1999 D.A.R. 7961
56 F.Supp.2d 1095 (1999) CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA; National Trust for Historic Preservation; Sierra Club; California Preservation Foundation; Los Angeles Conservancy; Pasadena Heritage; South Pasadena Preservation Foundation; South Pasadena Unified School District, Plaintiffs, v. Rodney E. SLATER, Secretary of Transportation; Kenneth R. Wykle, Federal Highway Administrator; Federal Highway Administration; Jose Medina, Director, California Departmen
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006-10-27 · Published · cited 9× · 459 F. Supp. 2d 480; 2006 WL 3051769
459 F.Supp.2d 480 (2006) WAYTEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, LLC, and Northern Laminate Sales, Inc., d/b/a NLS Technologies, Defendants. Civil Action No. 6:05CV00024. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. October 27, 2006. *481
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000-08-29 · Published · cited 1× · 196 F.R.D. 315; 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1182; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13236; 2000 WL 1279643
MEMORANDUM TRAUGER, District Judge. This case is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Docket No. 124), to which Defendant General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”) has responded (Docket No. 209), and the plaintiff has replied (Docket No. 243). Defendant GMAC has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 193),1 to which the plaint
MacDonald v. Hodsonpublic domain
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1970-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 19 C.M.A. 582; 19 USCMA 582; 42 C.M.R. 184; 1970 CMA LEXIS 788
Memorandum Opinion of the Court Charges alleging premeditated murder have been preferred against petitioner, and are presently under investigation by an officer appointed pursuant to Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 832. Petitioner avers that when the investigation commenced, the investigating officer granted his motion to hold open hearings. Shortly thereafter, the investigating officer revoked his ruling and an
In Re: Zada M.public domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs, March 8, 2011 IN RE: ZADA M. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Greene County No. J22232 Hon. Kenneth N. Bailey, Jr., Judge No. E2010-02207-COA-R3-PT - Filed April 11, 2011 In this parental termination case the Trial Court, upon hearing evidence, terminated the
District Court, C.D. California · 1999-07-19 · Published · cited 18× · 56 F. Supp. 2d 1106; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11032; 1999 WL 527723
56 F.Supp.2d 1106 (1999) CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rodney E. SLATER; et al., Defendants. No. CV98-6996DDP(MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 1999. *1107 *1108 *1109 Joseph W. Pannone, Kane Ballmer & Berkm
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995-08-04 · Published · cited 1× · 914 S.W.2d 512; 1995 Tenn. App. LEXIS 525
OPINION TODD, Presiding Judge, Middle Section. This appeal involves judicial review of an administrative decision regarding the proper premium charges to be paid by HRA, Inc. for its workers compensation insurance. The Trial Court determined that it was without jurisdiction because an interested party was not made a party to the petition for review. HRA has appealed and presented two issues as
State v. Fosterpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-08-01 · Published · cited 7× · 2024 Ohio 2924
[Cite as State v. Foster, 2024-Ohio-2924.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 21AP-314 v. : 22AP-589
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991-10-28 · Published · cited 51× · 944 F.2d 275
944 F.2d 275 56 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1352,57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,956, 20 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1255 Sherry E. GALBRAITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,James R. Hunter, Plaintiff,v.NORTHERN TELECOM, INC., Defendant-Appellee,Jeffrey Eason, Defendant. No. 90-5575. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Jan. 23, 1991.De
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999-06-23 · Published · cited 14× · 1999 ME 94; 736 A.2d 237; 1999 Me. 94; 1999 Me. LEXIS 106
736 A.2d 237 (1999) 1999 ME 94 Viola TRASK et al. v. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued June 9, 1999. Decided June 23, 1999. N. Laurence Willey Jr. (orally), Ferris, Dearborn & Willey, Brewer, Theodore S. Curtis Jr., Curtis & Griffin, Orono, for plaintiffs. Carl F. Rella (orally), Shaun B. Lister,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000-03-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 2, 2002 Session DAVID FROUNFELKER v. IDENTITY GROUP, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Putnam County No. 2001-141 Vernon Neal, Chancellor No. M2001-02542-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 5, 2002 Plaintiff agreed to sell his company to Defendant pursuant to an Asset Purc
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991-01-02 · Published · cited 4× · 753 F. Supp. 241; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69; 1991 WL 388
753 F.Supp. 241 (1991) CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, and Howard McDougall, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. HOWARD BAER, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. 90 C 4490. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. January 2, 1991. *242 Margaret M. Fahrenbach, Central States Southeast and Southwes
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-08-28 · Published · cited 15× · 113 F.4th 245
22-558-cv Palin v. New York Times Co. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2023 ARGUED: NOVEMBER 6, 2023 DECIDED: AUGUST 28, 2024 No. 22-558 SARAH PALIN, Plaintiff–Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991-11-05 · Published · cited 242× · 944 F.2d 1287
*1290 BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs are a class of thirty-three persons formerly employed at the Nashville, Tennessee plant of Aladdin Industries Electronics Division ("AIED”), a subsidiary of defendant Vernitron Corporation (“Verni-tron”). They are represented by the United Steel Workers, AFL-CIO-C
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 32 F. Supp. 3d 608; 2014 WL 3675557; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101929
ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter is back before the court following the opinion of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. MacDonald (MacDonald XI), 641 F.3d 596 (4th Cir.2011), vacating this court’s decision 1 to deny Movant Jeffrey MacDonald’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [DE-111]<
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985-03-01 · Published · cited 6× · 640 F. Supp. 286; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22143
640 F.Supp. 286 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey R. MacDONALD, Defendant. No. 75-26-CR-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. March 1, 1985. *287 *288 Brian M. Murtagh, Sr. Trial Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sp. Pros. Section, Washin