Cases

SEPARATE OPINIONS Justice Kennedy, concurring. If one were to ask an attorney or a judge to name the significant cases of his or her career, it would be unsurprising to find the list includes a case then being argued or just decided. When immersed in a case, lawyers and judges find within it a fascination, an intricacy, an importance that transcends what the detached observer sees. So th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) FAHRAN ROBB, ) ) Case No. 20-cv-929 (GMH) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BROOKE ROLLINS, Secretary

Opinion VEGAN, J. Andre J. Perdue was convicted by a jury of violating Penal Code former section 12370, subdivision (a) (section 12370(a)), which proscribed the possession of body armor by a person who has been convicted of a violent felony. 1 The trial court imposed the upper term of three years an

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Robert Winningham ) Docket No. 2017-04-0013 ) v. ) State File No. 97169-2016 ) Perdue Farms, Inc., et al. ) )

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 13, 2017 Decided May 16, 2017 No. 16-5189 MARILYN KEEPSEAGLE, ET AL., APPELLEES v. SONNY PERDUE, APPELLEE DONIVON CRAIG TINGLE, SILENT CLASS MEMBER, APPELLANT Consolidated with 16-5190 Appea

Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Sotomayor join, concurring in part and dissenting in part. We granted certiorari in this case to consider “whether the calculation of an attorney’s fee” that is “based on the ‘lodestar,’” ante, at 546 (opinion of the Court), can “ever be enhanced based solely on [the] quality of [the lawye

687 S.E.2d 690 (2009) McCRACKEN AND AMICK, INCORPORATED d/b/a The New Vemco Music Co. and Ralph Amick, Plaintiffs, v. Beverly Eaves PERDUE, in her official capacity as Governor of North Carolina, Defendant. No. COA09-431. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 22, 2009. *691 Everett Gaskins Hancock & Stevens, LLP, by Hu

[Cite as State v. Kennedy, 2026-Ohio-2203.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : C.A. No. 30470 Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 2024 CR 01950 v.

MONTEITH, Chief Justice. This is an action brought by appellant, B. O. Perdue, against appellee, Dr. D. E. Hughes, for injunction to restrain appel-lee from practicing optometry in Houston County for a period of two years from the termination of a certain contract entered into between the parties. Appellant’s suit was based upon a written contract, wherein appellant agreed to furnish appellee optometrical

Admission, in the District Court, of Frank Crawford's written testimony concerning the destruction of the purported will clearly was not repugnant to the spirit or letter of Art. 3690. Upon the trial in the County Court that witness had been "called to testify thereto by the opposite party," in the fullest sense, and had so testified, orally, in open court, in that cause. Compliance with Art. 3275 rendered that testimony available in a subsequent trial of the cause in the District Court.

694 S.W.2d 359 (1985) DETAR HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Roque ESTRADA, Appellee. No. 13-84-099-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 14, 1985. Rehearing Denied April 4, 1985. *361 Jim M. Perdue, Perdue, Turner & Berry, Houston, for appellants. Robert P. Houston, Anderson, Smit

This is a divorce case. In the stating portion of her complaint, the wife alleged the ages and residency of the parties, that they were married and had no children, that an incompatibility of temperament exists between them, that she needs pendente lite support, and that the wife is without sufficient funds to pay her attorney but that the husband is financially capable of contributing for her legal services. Only the following relief was requested: a divorce, that the husband

Kennedy, J. *41 {¶ 1} In this case, the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas found appellants, the state of Ohio and the attorney general (collectively, "the state"), to be in contempt of a court order that permanently enjoined them from enforcing several statutes that the

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 23, 2012 Session IN RE THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF ALFONSO B. PATTON Appeal from the Probate Court for Davidson County No. 10P191 Hon. David Randall Kennedy, Judge No. M2011-01296-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 6, 2012 In this conservatorship case, Gloria and

FILED October 26, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VI

MEMORANDUM OPINION September 20, 2017 [Dkt. ##94, 95, 96, 97] RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge In 2001, the United' States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) promulgated the Roadless Area Conservation Rule—commonly referred to as the “Roadless Rule”—which limits road construction and timber harvesting in national forests. It is this Rule—and its application to the Ton-gass N

CLARK, Judge. In this medical malpractice suit, defendants had a verdict from the jury and plaintiffs-claimants appeal. Affirmed. The points raised by appellants are limited to claims of error in rulings by the trial court on objections to closing arguments. The facts of the case therefore need only be stated briefly to place the closing arguments in the perspective of their context at the time the questione

L AGE SEN, J. Defendant conditionally pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence that he possessed the drug. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred when it determined that the warrantless handcuffing and search of defendant that led to the discovery of the methamphetamine were j

FILED September 20, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Jaylen A

229 P.3d 168 (2010) Richard KRAUSE and B. Jean Krause, Appellants, v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, Carol Christiansen, Norma Christiansen, Ted Perdue, Jeanette Perdue, Curt Christiansen, and Monique Christiansen, Appellees. No. S-13068. Supreme Court of Alaska. April 23, 2010. *170 Joe P. Josephson, Josephson & Associates, P.C.