Cases

427 B.R. 780 (2010) In re MORTGAGES LTD., Debtor. PDG Los Arcos, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. Robert M. Adams, et al., Appellees. No. CV 09-1312-PHX-MHM. Bankruptcy No. 2:08-bk-7465-RJH. Adversary Nos. 2:08-ap-00781-RJH, 2:08-ap-00831-RJH. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2010. *782 Cathy L. Reece, Keith L.

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 59 Docket: Cum-22-394 Argued: July 6, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. ALAN R. ATKINS et al. v. MARIE F. ADAMS et al. CONNORS, J. [¶1] Alan R. Atkins and Gail P. Atkin

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit _____________________ No. 25-1780 STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI'I; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE O

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Clyde Adams (“Adams”) appeals from the judgment of the District Court granting the motion of defendants-appellees Mary Ann Vande-mark and the Human Development Corporation (“HDC”) for summary judgment in his civil rights action. Plaintiff-appellant Mark Panknin (“Panknin”) appeals from the judgment of the District Court granting the motion of defendants-appellees for a directed ver

36 Mass. App. Ct. 714 (1994) 636 N.E.2d 280 CHRISTOPHER J. RAHILLY, administrator,[1] vs. NORTH ADAMS REGIONAL HOSPITAL & others.[2] No. 92-P-1583. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Hampden. February 18, 1994. June 28, 1994. Present: DREBEN, KAPLAN, & GILLERMAN, JJ.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Humphreys and O’Brien Argued at Lexington, Virginia PUBLISHED NATALIE MARIE KEEPERS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0279-19-3 JUDGE MARY GRACE O’BRIEN

AMENDED OPINION 1 DAVIS, Presiding Judge: 4 1 Polly Adams (Mother) appeals the juvenile court's grant of Sean Barnett's (Father) child protective order petition. We dismiss the appeal because the issues are moot. BACKGROUND T2 Mother and Father are

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE Mary Grace Diehl, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge This case involves the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court to determine tax liability under 11 U.S.C. § 505.1 Defendant Mississippi Department of Revenue (“Defendant”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (“Moti

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2026 Doc: 42 Filed: 04/14/2026 Pg: 1 of 9 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2026 CRYSTAL RICE, in her individual capacity and as personal representative of the Estate of Cynthia Rice, Plaintiff – Appellee, v.

656 F.3d 397 (2011) LaTasha ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Karen HANSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-2045. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 7, 2011. Decided and Filed: August 30, 2011. *399 ARGUED: Barry A. Wolf, Flint, Michigan, for Appellant. Mary Massaron Ross, Plunkett Cooney, Detroi

EARL A. ADAMS, JR., ET AL. * NO. 2019-CA-0210 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CHEVRON USA, INC., ET AL. * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: EARL ADAMS, ET AL NO. 2019-C-0198 VERSUS CHEVRON USA

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Jane Hall sued Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), alleging that MetLife abused its discretion in denying her claim to receive the proceeds of her late husband’s life insurance policy under an employee-benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The district court

Council of the City of N.Y. v Adams (2025 NY Slip Op 25141) [*1] Council of the City of N.Y. v Adams 2025 NY Slip Op 25141 Decided on June 12, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Rosado, J. Published by Ne

499 F.3d 547 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ritchie G. KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-6586. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: May 31, 2007. Decided and Filed: August 24, 2007. *548 ARGUED: Mary Ellen Coleman, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellant. Caryn

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. This case highlights the evolving nature of students’ First Amendment protection for speech on social media. While I disagree with the court’s determination that Keefe was afforded procedural due process, I would affirm the district court on that issue because defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. However,

995 A.2d 763 (2010) 192 Md. App. 469 Marshall ADAMS v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1204 Sept.Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 26, 2010. *764 Amy E. Brennan (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Jeremy M. McCoy (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0338p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, -

Kennedy, J. This is an appeal of a summary judgment dismissing the legal malpractice claim brought by two daughters against their deceased mother’s marital dissolution attorney, claiming that he failed to timely finalize their mother’s divorce prior to her death, thereby causing them to lose portions of their inheritance. Under Trask v. Butler, 123 Wn.2d 835, 842-43, 872 P.2d 1080 (1994), a nonclient plaintiff has stand

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Cornel Ray Joshua, a paranoid schizophrenic, received an indeterminate life sentence for stealing two bottles of alcohol valued at $62.1 Such a sentence is nothing if not cruel and unusual. Because “[t]his age of enlightenment cannot tolerate such barbarous action,” Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 678, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758