Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied. Same case below, 195 Md. App. 403, 6 A.3d 396.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.

Zuri Kelly v. State of Maryland, No. 68, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Zarnoch, J. STATUTES – RETROACTIVITY – Statutes are presumed to operate prospectively. However, there are exceptions to this presumption: 1) a legislative change affecting procedure only and not substantive rights; 2) a statute that has remedial effect and does not impair vested rights; and 3) a statute that affects a matter still in litigation. An important caveat to each of these exceptions is that they cannot be applie

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

BARBERA, C.J. For eleven days in April 2010, police conducted tracking of Petitioner Wesley Torrance Kelly’s vehicle, using a global positioning system (“GPS”) device attached to the vehicle’s exterior. As a result of that GPS tracking, officers made observations and collected information they used to obtain warrants to search Petitioner’s home, a separate residence in downtown Baltimore, Petitioner’s vehicle, and three pawn s

JAMES R. EYLER (Retired, specially assigned), J. This is an appeal by Wesley Torrance Kelly, appellant, from convictions in the Circuit Court for Howard County and the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. The cases were consolidated on appeal. In Anne Arundel County, the court convicted appellant of burglary in the second degree, committed on April 12, 2010, *

PER CURIAM ORDER. The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case, it is this 1st day of March 2013, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, and the same is hereby, affirmed summarily by a unanimous Court** on the bases of laches and untimeliness,

37 A.3d 318 (2012) 424 Md. 630 KEVIN KELLY v. STATE. Pet. Docket No. 446. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Denied February 9, 2012. Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied.

6 A.3d 396 (2010) 195 Md. App. 403 Kenneth KELLY a/k/a Kenneth Maurice Kelly, Jr. v. STATE of Maryland. No. 645, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 4, 2010. *399 Brian L. Zavin (Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender, on the brief) Baltimore, MD, for appellant. Sara P. Pri

975 A.2d 875 (2009) 409 Md. 414 ANTHONY KELLY v. STATE. Pet. Docket No. 160. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Denied July 21, 2009. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

*544RAKER, J., dissenting, in which HARRELL, J., joins. To reverse this case would be a travesty upon justice. Petitioner received a fair trial before a fair judge, and was not deprived of due process in any way. In addition, petitioner was not denied his right to be present at every critical stage of the tr

873 A.2d 434 (2005) 162 Md. App. 122 Francesco Alexjandre KELLY v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1444, September Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 2, 2005. *436 Michael P. Lytle (Byron L. Warnken, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Devy Patterson Russell (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., At

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas R. Cox appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against the State of Maryland and Anne Arundel County, and his defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

879 A.2d 1086 (2005) 388 Md. 404 Francesco A. Kelly, v. State. Pet. Docket No. 181. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Granted August 10, 2005. Petition for writ of certiorari granted.

331 Md. 164 (1993) 626 A.2d 959 WINFIELD M. KELLY, JR., SECRETARY OF STATE ET AL. v. VOTE KNOW COALITION OF MARYLAND, INC. ET AL. No. 54, September Term, 1992 Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 28, 1993. Order Filed August 19, 1992. Ralph S. Tyler, Deputy Atty. Gen., Baltimore, for petitioners. Joseph A. Schwar

875 A.2d 703 (2005) 387 Md. 353 MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al. v. Keith A. BRADFORD, et al. No. 85, September Term, 2004. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 9, 2005. *705 Elizabeth Kameen, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen. of MD, Valerie V. Cloutier and Elliott L. Schoen, Asst.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1338 Doc: 70 Filed: 09/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 41 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1248 STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MINNESOTA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1248 Doc: 98 Filed: 09/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 41 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1248 STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MINNESOTA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE

PER CURIAM: Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland, No. l:08-cv-01087-CCB (D.Md. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le