⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kelly v. Schlossberg”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004-08-16 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ROGER SCHLOSSBERG,  Trustee-Appellant, v.  No. 03-2081 JEAN BARNEY, Debtor-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Jud
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004-08-16 · Published · cited 64× · 380 F.3d 174; 94 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5505; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16746; 2004 WL 1812716
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge FLANAGAN joined. OPINION DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Roger Schlossberg, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee (“Appellant”), challenges the order of the district court affirming the bankruptcy court in overruling his objection to an exe
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1991-03-14 · Published · cited 4× · 125 B.R. 945; 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 431; 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 868
125 B.R. 945 (1991) In re R.L. KELLY AND SONS, MILLERS, Debtor. In re Austin S. KELLY, Debtor. In re Earl L. KELLY, Debtor. In re Evelyn R. KELLY, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 89-4-0193-SD, 89-4-0194-SD, 89-4-0452-SD and 89-4-0195-SD. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Rockville. March 14, 1991. *946
Kelly v. McMullanpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 49 S.W.2d 501; 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 404
Appellee brought suit against appellant for the sum of $575, which he alleged to be due him by reason of the fact that he furnished appellant information as to the closing out of the Acorn Stores, Inc., a corporation. Appellee's allegations were that appellant's business was to conduct closing-out sales for other parties; that by virtue of the information furnished by appellee, appellant secured contracts for conducting closing-out sales of a number of stores which had been previously
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-01-02 · Published · cited 36× · 879 F.3d 269
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. In 2010, feuding members of the Seldin family entered into a Separation Agreement to divide jointly owned assets. Thé Separation Agreement contained an arbitration clause, ‘requiring the parties to arbitrate any claims involving their jointly owned property. Rather than arbitrating, Appellant Scott Seldin (“Scott”) filed a lawsuit
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009-10-21 · Published · cited 1× · 667 F. Supp. 2d 443; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97472; 2009 WL 3447284
667 F.Supp.2d 443 (2009) FIRST UNITED BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff v. The PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-00429. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 21, 2009. *447 John B. Dempsey, Myers, Brier & Kelly, LLP, Scranton, PA, Roger Schlossberg, Schlossberg &
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002-09-03 · Published · cited 0× · 152 N.C. App. 673; 568 S.E.2d 260; 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 966
GREENE, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority as to the first part of its opinion holding that the trial court erred in concluding plaintiff was no longer a dependent spouse. The majority opinion, however, also holds that the trial court’s findings do not discuss plaintiff’s earning capacity and thus this Court need not address the question
Pavich v. Pavichpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 203 A.D.3d 492; 160 N.Y.S.3d 872; 2022 NY Slip Op 01519
Pavich v Pavich (2022 NY Slip Op 01519) Pavich v Pavich 2022 NY Slip Op 01519 Decided on March 10, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999-08-31 · Published · cited 2× · 65 F. Supp. 2d 778; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14336; 1999 WL 728627
65 F.Supp.2d 778 (1999) Pamela J. ALPER and Michael N. Alper, Plaintiffs, v. ALTHEIMER & GRAY, an Illinois general partnership, Myron Lieberman, individually, and Robert L. Schlossberg, individually, Defendants. No. 97 C 1200. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 31, 1999. Robert Patrick Cummins, Megyn M. Kelly, Bickel & Brew
Dillon v. Conwaypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-04-26 · Published · cited 90× · 642 F.3d 358; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8492; 2011 WL 1548955
642 F.3d 358 (2011) Chauncey DILLON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Superintendent James T. CONWAY, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. Docket No. 08-4030-pr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: April 6, 2011. Decided: April 26, 2011. *359 Michele Hauser, New York, NY, for petitioner-
District Court, District of Columbia · 1988-07-13 · Published · cited 45× · 691 F. Supp. 407; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7039; 1988 WL 73289
691 F.Supp. 407 (1988) GENETIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 87-1722. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 13, 1988. *408 Ronald A. Stern, Hughes, Hubbard & Reed, Washington, D.C., and Jerome G. Shapiro (pro hac vice, New York Office), for plaintiff
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 192 F. Supp. 3d 323; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92741; 2016 WL 3636021
DECISION & ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge On June 3, 2014, Lisa Fisher (“Plaintiff’) commenced an action against Mermaid Manor Home for Adults, LLC (“Defendant”). See Compl., ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleged discrimination and retaliation against Plaintiff on the basis of her national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008-08-05 · Published · cited 5× · 664 S.E.2d 58; 191 N.C. App. 575; 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1497
The standard of review for a motion for summary judgment is whether there is any genuine issue of material fact and whether the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.1 Here, the defendants argue the trial court erred by partially denying their *Page 576 motion for summary judgment because they are entitled to the protection of the public duty doctrine and public officers' immun
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 215 Md. App. 517; 81 A.3d 620; 2013 WL 6687589; 2013 Md. App. LEXIS 167
ZARNOCH, J. In this medical malpractice case, Celeste Puppolo (“Puppolo”), in her capacity as personal representative of the estate of Nancy Puppolo (“Mrs. Puppolo”), sued Adventist Healthcare, Inc. (“Adventist”) and Dr. Sabyasachi Kar alleging negligence in the death of Mrs. Puppolo. Puppolo now seeks review of an order of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, which granted Adventist’s and Dr. Kar’s motions for summary jud
Lin v. Cruzpublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020-09-30 · Published · cited 15× · 239 A.3d 720; 247 Md. App. 606
Qun Lin v. Jose Reyes Cruz, et al. No. 2944, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Testimony>Credibility Determination>Bench Trial When weighing the credibility of witnesses and resolving conflicts in the evidence, “the fact-finder has the discretion to decide which evidence to credit and which to reject.” Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Connor, 136 Md. App. 91, 136, (2000). “In this regard, it may believe part of a particular witness’s testimony but disbelieve other parts.” Id. Mr. Chen’s deposit
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013-05-17 · Published · cited 107× · 728 F.3d 1; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9937; 2013 WL 2129119
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 11-1792 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. BRIMA WURIE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]
District Court, N.D. New York · 2004-03-29 · Published · cited 2× · 358 F. Supp. 2d 44; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27658; 2004 WL 3210791
358 F.Supp.2d 44 (2004) FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. JOSEPH R. WUNDERLICH, INC, Joseph Wunderlich and Jean Wunderlich Defendants. No. CIV. 102CV0471RFT. United States District Court, N.D. New York. March 29, 2004. *45 *46 Torre, Lentz Law Firm, Jericho, NY (Brad A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004-11-30 · Published · cited 22× · 391 F.3d 1295; 2004 WL 2711898
RONEY, Circuit Judge: In this case of first impression in this Circuit, we hold that property owned by a Chapter 13 bankruptcy debtor as tenancy by the entireties with a non-debtor under Florida law is not part of the bankruptcy estate and therefore cannot be reached by creditors. Provided that the property meets all requirements as a tenancy by the entireties under applicable
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012-08-07 · Published · cited 71× · 222 N.C. App. 285; 2012 WL 3173754; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 946; 730 S.E.2d 226
STEPHENS, Judge. In May 2007, Plaintiff Mary Ann Wilcox was shot by Asheville Police Department (“APD”) officers during APD’s pursuit of a vehicle in which Wilcox was the only occupant other than the driver. The pursuit began when the driver of the vehicle sped away from an APD officer during a traffic stop. At several points during the approximately 20-minute pursuit, which involved multiple APD officers and reached speeds
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014-12-05 · Published · cited 6× · 522 B.R. 41; 2014 WL 6879248
SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION AFFIRMING APPLICATION OF THE TRUSTEE’S INTER-ACCOUNT METHOD TO THE DETERMINATION OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN BLMIS ACCOUNTS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: The motion before the Court (the “Motion ”) concerns the appropriate methodology for computing the “net equity” in a customer accou