Cases

Opinion PREMO, Acting P. J. I. Introduction The University of California Santa Cmz (UCSC) filed an application with the Santa Cruz County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), requesting approval of an agreement between it and the City of Santa Cmz (City) pursuant to which City would extend water and sewer services to UCSC’s north campus, an

Opinion PREMO, J. Kelly and Reginald R. appeal from a judgment declaring their son, Jonathan R., permanently free from their custody and control under Civil Code section 232, subdivision (a)(7).1 On appeal they contend that (1) the trial court ignored present circumstances in its finding that returning the child to their custody would be detrimental to the child, and that they wer

Filed 8/5/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GRANNY PURPS, INC., H045387 (Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 16CV01899) v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., Defendants and Respondents. Santa Cr

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 136 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 137 OPINION James Sienkiewicz was dismissed as a detention officer by the Sheriff of Santa Cruz County in Ja

*113 Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 340B of the Public Health Services Act, 42 U. S. C. §256b (2006 ed. and Supp. IV), imposes ceilings on prices drug manufacturers may charge for medications sold to specified health-care facilities. Those facilities, here

People v Santa Cruz (2018 NY Slip Op 03742) People v Cruz 2018 NY Slip Op 03742 Decided on May 24, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

Opinion WERDEGAR, J. We must decide whether two county zoning ordinances relating to the permissible locations for timber operations are preempted by state forestry statutes. Concluding they are not, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal. Background In 1999, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San

65 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 234 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Praful C. PATEL, Defendant and Appellant. [And eight other cases.[*]]. No. H030689. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. September 18, 2007. *827 Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovace

*1283Opinion MIHARA, J. Appellant Habitat and Watershed Caretakers (Habitat) challenges the trial court’s denial of its mandate petition. Habitat’s petition contended that respondent City of Santa Cruz (the City) had failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). The City had certified an env

151 S.W.3d 683 (2004) Regina KELLY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 10-04-00283-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. November 3, 2004. *684 Rebecca Bernhardt, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA, for appellant. John C. Paschall, Robertson County Dist. Atty., Franklin, Douglas M. Becker

485 F.3d 1041 Maria M. GONZALEZ; Bernie Abeytia; Arizona Hispanic Community Forum; Chicanos por La Causa; Friendly House; Jesus Gonzalez; Debbie Lopez; Southwest Voter Registration Education Project; Luciano Valencia; Valle del Sol; The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.; Arizona Advocacy Network; Steve M. Gallardo; League of United Latin American Citizens Arizona; League of Women Voters of Arizona; People for the American Way Foundation; Hopi T

42 Cal.Rptr.3d 96 (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 914 BRANCIFORTE HEIGHTS, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. H028864. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. April 19, 2006. *99 John G. Barisone, Santa Cruz and Jeffrey E. Barnes, San Francisco and Atchison, Bariso

796 F.Supp. 1316 (1992) Douglas MILLER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, Sheriff Al Noren, Officer Marilyn Weaver, Officer Terry Moore, and Does I Through XX, Inclusive, Defendants. No. C 89-20131 EAI. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 29, 1992. *1317 Richard K. Abdalah, Jackson, MacAllister & Abdalah, Cu

SUSAN VAN KEULEN, United States Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION On May 29, 2018, Plaintiffs Kristi Kelley and Chad Loya (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), individually and on behalf of the United States filed a complaint to redress violations of the Federal False Claims Act. ECF 1 ("Complaint"). Plaintiffs rented a residential unit from Defendants Roger Denault and the Denault Family Limited Partnershi

Filed 7/28/23; Certified for Publication 7/31/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE COALITION OF COUNTY UNIONS, B314973 et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. 20STCP04019) v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOA

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: The influx of detainees in the Tucson Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol in 2015 resulted in Defendants (federal government officials and agents) holding detainees being processed for longer periods of time in overcrowded and unsanitary cells at eight different stations. Plaintiffs brought t

ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Marilyn Scheer, .a lawyer in California, challenges California’s procedures for attorney discipline. Scheer argues that California violated her constitutional rights by not providing her meaningful judicial review in a fee dispute between herself and a client. She also asserts that the rules governing the California Stat

(2008) Victor CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. Louis LIBERATORE, individually and in his official capacity, Thomas Belfiore, individually and in his official capacity, Westchester County Police Department, and The County of Westchester, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 9808(SCR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 14, 2008. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

Filed 3/10/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, Petitioner, A157609 v. APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE (Humboldt County Super. Ct. SUPERIOR COURT OF HUMBOLDT No. CV180055) COUNTY, Respondent; ALEJANDRO QUEZADA,