⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kelly v. Lucas”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2025-06-06 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Jun 06 2025, 9:10 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Lucas v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 175 So. 3d 939; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14995; 2015 WL 5883398
WALLIS, J. We affirm this Anders1 appeal in all respects. However, we note that the judgment contains a scrivener’s error in stating Appellant’s conviction for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. The jury found Appellant guilty of the lesser-included offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and the lower court adjudicated Appellant guilty of aggravated assault, “the lesser include
Ex parte Lucaspublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016-06-10 · Published · cited 5× · 212 So. 3d 921
WISE, Justice. Kelly Martin Lucas, the defendant below, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct the Shelby Circuit Court to vacate its December 7, 2015, order denying her motion for a summary judgment and to grant the motion. We grant the petition and issue the writ. Facts and Procedural History- On August 1, 2011, there were two related aut
Berg v. Kellypublic domain
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-11-30 · Published · cited 12× · 343 F. Supp. 3d 419
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge On August 10, 2016, the district court issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part a motion for summary judgment by defendants. The plaintiffs now move for reconsideration of that opinion to the extent it dismissed their purported claim under Monell v. Department of Social Services,
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-12-12 · Published · cited 1× · 877 F.3d 790
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Lucas J. Lacy was convicted of receiving and distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him to 60 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release. After prison, he violated the conditions of release. The co
Lucas v. Awaadpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013-01-29 · Published · cited 76× · 299 Mich. App. 345
WILDER, J. In these consolidated appeals, defendant Dr. Yasser Awaad and his professional corporation, Yasser Awaad, M.D., P.C., and defendants Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., Great Lakes Fediatric Neurology, P.C., *349Oakwood Professional Billing, L.L.C., and Oakwood United Hospitals, Inc.,1 appeal by leave granted orders entered in three related l
Kelly v. Lindenaupublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-05-17 · Published · cited 3× · 223 So. 3d 1074; 2017 WL 2180970; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6959
MORRIS, Judge. The appellants, Jill Kelly (Jill), Jeff Falkenthal (Jeff), and Judy L. Mors-Kotr-ba (Judy), as successor trustee, appeal a final judgment reforming a trust and requiring Judy to transfer title to real property to a trust beneficiary, the appellee, Donna Lindenau. Below, Judy petitioned for a declaratory judgment in her capacity as successor trustee of a trust crea
People v. Lucaspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2009-09-28 · Published · cited 1× · 772 N.W.2d 354; 485 Mich. 888
772 N.W.2d 354 (2009) PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Adam LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 137889. COA No. 276819. Supreme Court of Michigan. September 28, 2009. Order By order of April 28, 2009, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance p
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 775 F.3d 1008; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24558; 2014 WL 7398659
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. Appellant Lorenzo Pedro Lorenzo-Lucas (“Lorenzo-Lucas”) was convicted by jury of one count of illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Over Lorenzo-Lucas’s objection, the Government introduced at trial a form 1-205, also known as a warrant of deportation, to establish that Lorenzo-Lucas had been previously deported in 20
People v. Lucaspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2005-12-05 · Published · cited 0× · 706 N.W.2d 200; 474 Mich. 946
706 N.W.2d 200 (2005) People v. Lucas. No. 129258. Supreme Court of Michigan. December 5, 2005. Application for Leave to Appeal. SC: 129258, COA: 254521. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2005 judgment of the *201 Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013-07-09 · Published · cited 1× · 412 S.W.3d 285; 2013 WL 3421926; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 823
PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge. Introduction Lucas Lofts Investors LLC (Seller), Mark Cofman, Realty Exchange, Inc., and Apartment Exchange, Inc. (collectively, Defendants), along with Realtex, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker Premier Group (Third-Party Defendant),1 appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration <
Swedenburg v. Kellypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004-02-12 · Published · cited 5× · 358 F.3d 223; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2337
358 F.3d 223 Juanita SWEDENBURG, in her own capacity, Juanita Swedenburg, as proprietor of Swedenburg Winery, a Virginia partnership, David Lucas, in his own capacity, David Lucas, as proprietor of The Lucas Winery, a California sole proprietorship, Patrick G. Fitzgerald, Cortes Derussy, Robin Brooks, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Edward F. KELLY, Chairman of the State Liquor Authority, Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State of New York, in
Swedenburg v. Kellypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004-02-12 · Published · cited 8× · 358 F.3d 223; 2004 WL 254401
WESLEY, Circuit J. On December 6, 1933, the New York Times declared that “[p]rohibition of alcoholic beverages as a national policy ended at 5:32 1/2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time” when Utah became the thirty-sixth state to ratify the Twenty-first Amendment. Final Action at Capital, N.Y. TIMES, Dec. 6, 1933, at 1. Utah had seen fit to delay its vote so that it might have the “honor” of ending the Prohibition era — -Penns
Swedenburg v. Kellypublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-11-12 · Published · cited 7× · 232 F. Supp. 2d 135; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21841; 2002 WL 31521023
232 F.Supp.2d 135 (2002) Juanita SWEDENBURG, in her own capacity and as Proprietor of Swedenburg Winery, a Virginia Partnership; David Lucas, in his own capacity and as Proprietor of the Lucas Winery, a California sole Proprietorship; Patrick Fitzgerald; Cortes DeRussy; and Robin Brooks Plaintiff, v. Edward F. KELLY, Chairman, and Lawrence J. Gedda and Joseph Zarriello, Commissioners, of the State Liquor Authority, Division of Alcoholic Beverage
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
*********** Based upon review of the competent evidence of record with references to the errors assigned and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** Based upon all of the competent evidence of record the Full Commission m
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CM-0878 ANTONIO LUCAS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,
Lucas v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 17 F.3d 1434; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12219; 1994 WL 66012
17 F.3d 1434NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Roland G. LUCAS, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,v.David SMITH; C. E. Thompson; David Williams; LarryHuffman; E. B. Wright, Jr.,; D. A. Garraghty;Kelly, Warden and S
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 943 N.E.2d 394; 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 105; 2011 WL 303241
OPINION RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant-Plaintiff, Walsh & Kelly, Inc. (Walsh), appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Appellee-Defendant, Signature Properties, Inc. (Signature), with respect to Signature’s claim that it was not fully indemnified for its damages by a collateral assignment agreement and with respect to Signature’s claim that Walsh sland
State v. Kellypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 1612
[Cite as State v. Kelly, 2024-Ohio-1612.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 29774 : v.
Lucas v. Kurtpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991-02-15 · Published · cited 1× · 595 N.E.2d 478; 72 Ohio App. 3d 511; 1991 Ohio App. LEXIS 651
This case is an appeal from a final judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas dated November 1, 1989, which granted summary judgment to appellees. The underlying action was commenced by appellant on April 18, 1988, against four defendants. Defendants Harry Kessler, Clerk of Municipal Court of the city of Toledo, and the city of Toledo were dismissed on motion, and the case proceeded against appellees Patricia Kurt and the Toledo Legal Aid Society. The allegations of the complaint whi