Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kelly v. HHS”
Kelly v. Hhspublic domain
876 F.2d 890 Kellyv.HHS NO. 89-6045 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. MAY 15, 1989 1 Appeal From: N.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.
Miller v. Hhspublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 02-235V (To be published) ************************* KELLIE MILLER and * RON MILLER, as mother and father of * A.H.M., a minor, * Filed: June 3, 2016 * Petitioners, *
Allen v. Hhspublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 02-1237V Filed: September 26, 2015 For Publication ******************************** COLLEEN BOSTON MADARIAGA and * JAMES ALLEN, parents and guardians of * A.A., a minor, * Measles, Mumps, and
Cozart v. Hhspublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 15, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PUBLISHED DECISION DWAYNE COZART and MICHELE * HAMILTON, as representatives of the * No. 00-590V
Merck & Co., Inc. v. HHSpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 13, 2020 Decided June 16, 2020 No. 19-5222 MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., APPELLEES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colu
New Mexico Health Connections v. HHSpublic domain
PUBLISH FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT December 31, 2019 _________________________________
Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. Kelly S. appeals the dispositional judgment in the dependency case of her daughter, Madison T. Kelly contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by admitting prejudicial hearsay evidence, and thus we must reverse the order placing Madison in foster care. We affirm. *1508BACKGROUND
Adventist Health System v. U.S. Dept. of HHSpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1589 ___________________________ Adventist Health System/SunBelt, Inc., et al. lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al.;
Frank O'Brien, Jr. v. Department of HHSpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3357 ___________________________ Frank R. O’Brien, Jr.; O’Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Sylvia Mathews Burw
Kelly Arango, Parent Of, Isabela Orozco, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program; National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34; DTaP Vaccine; Acute Encephalopathy; Seizures; 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(b)(2)(i)(E). OPINION AND ORDER 1 GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge Petitioner, Kelly A
Kelly v. Bowenpublic domain
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. These cases were consolidated for purposes of appeal. Both appeals involve applications for attorney’s fees and other expenses to be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A). Following oral argument, the court requested supplemental briefing on the issue of the scope of EAJA coverage in light of the 1985 re-enactment and amendment of the EAJA. Act of Aug. 5,
Kelly v. Bowenpublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelly v. Bowenpublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
*400Opinion SCOTLAND, P. J. This is an appeal run amok. Not only does the appeal lack merit, the opening brief is a textbook example of what an appellate brief should not be. In 76,235 words, rambling and ranting over the opening brief’s 202 pages, appellant’s counsel has managed to violate rules of court; ignore standards of review; m
Kelly v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.public domain
Kelly v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 2022 NCBC 70. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION GUILFORD COUNTY 2018 CVS 4978 JOHN “KRIS” KELLY, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR METROPOLITAN LIFE
Petition of Kelly Hagenbuchpublic domain
Bassett, J. The petitioner, Kelly Hagenbuch, has petitioned for a writ of certiorari, see SUP. Ct. R. 11, challenging the termination of her food stamp benefits by the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (department). The department terminated the petitioner’s benefits because it found that her income exceeded the maximum amount permitted by the program. I
Gautreaux, Kelly v. Hermtiage Hallpublic domain
FILED Mar 12, 2019 01:55 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Kelly v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1548V Filed: October 18, 2022 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner KEVIN KELLY, Petitioner, Myasthenia Gravis; Diplopia; v.
Kelly v. Hecklerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services terminating a period of disability and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XYI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), respectively. The case is now before the Court on d
Kelly v. Secretary of Health & Human Servicespublic domain
CURTIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Ronald Kelly filed this action to challenge a decision of the Defendant Secretary of Health and Human Services that he is not entitled to disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. Mr. Kelly applied for disability insurance benefits on October 8, 1991. A.R. 100-02.1 The application was denie