Cases

ORDER PER CURIAM. Death row inmate Don William Davis moves for a stay of his execution scheduled for April 17, 2017, at 7:00 p.m., pending full briefing and argument of his appeal from the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We deny his motion for stay. “[A] stay of execution is an equitable remedy. It is not available as a matter of ri

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen 22 closed civil cases. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cou

Worswick, C.J. ¶1 — A jury convicted Scott Davis of attempted first degree murder and first degree assault, both with firearm enhancements, for engaging in a firefight with and wounding a sheriff’s deputy. Davis appeals his convictions, arguing that (1) his convictions for attempted murder and first degree assault violated double jeopardy, (2) the firearm enhancement for his first degree assault conviction violated double jeopard

244 P.3d 101 (2010) The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Jaren Scott DAVIS, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0399. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B. December 29, 2010. *102 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General By Kent E. Cattani and Laura P. Chiasson, Tucson, Attorneys for Appellee. Joseph P. DiRoberto, Bi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ruben Castillo, Chief Judge • Tonya Davis (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Ernest B. Fenton, the Law Office of Ernest B. Fenton, P.C. (“the Law Office”), and Legal Services, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of' the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., and the- Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982; attorney ma

KEATY, Judge. | Hhis appeal stems from an incident between co-workers at their place of employment in which one of the workers was severely injured. For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court did not err in granting a motion for directed verdict in favor of the injured employee based *967on its finding that his co-worker committed an intentional tort up

COX, J. Appellants, Carl and April Davis ("Carl" and "April," respectively), appeal a judgment from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Morehouse, State of Louisiana, wherein the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment on behalf of Appellee, Bastrop Tank Wash ("Bastrop"), and denied Appellants' motion for new trial. Carl contends that the trial court erred in finding there was no genuine issue of material fact,

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. An Oklahoma jury convicted Defendant Brian Darrell Davis of the first-degree murder and rape of Josephine “Jody” Sanford, the mother of his girlfriend Stacey Sanford. On the recommendation of the jury, Defendant received a 100-year prison sentence for the rape and a death sentence for the murder. After unsuccessfully appealing to

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur. VILLANTI, J., Concurs specially.

II. Standard of Review in Motion to Recall the Mandate This court has the inherent power to recall its mandate but will exercise that power only in the most "extraordinary circumstances" to be used as a last resort to address "grave, unforeseen contingencies." Ward v. State , 2015 Ark. 61, at 3,

939 A.2d 905 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Mark DAVIS, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued August 29, 2007. Filed December 17, 2007. *906 Sheldon A. Kovach, Media, for Com., appellant. Scott C. Shields, Media, for appellee. BEFORE: KLEIN, BENDER and KELLY, JJ. OPINION BY KELLY

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Cutter Morning Star School District, Fountain Lake School District, Jessieville School District, Lake Hamilton School District, and Mountain Pine School District (the school districts) sought termination of the Garland County School Desegregation Case Comprehensive Settlement Agreement (the Agreement) and relief from the district court’s 1992 order enforcing

07/03/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 26, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KELLY SCOTT HOOD Appeal from the Criminal Court for Cumberland County Nos. 13-0073, 13-343, 14-103 David A. Patterson, Judge No. E2017-02166-CCA-R3-

PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. North Carolina, No. 2:11-cv-00500-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

KELLY, J. After nearly a decade of litigation and alternative dispute resolution proceedings, the indemnification contract underlying the troubled natatorium roof in this case again wends its way to this Court. We previously held that the six-year period of limitations of MCL 600.5807(8) applies to the parties’ indemnification contract.

DAVIS, J., dissenting. The majority opinion has reversed the circuit court’s decision by finding that Mr. Scott could use the writ of certiorari to have the circuit court review an administrative ruling. The majority also reversed by concluding that the administrative hearing in this case was invalid because it was conducted before a panel. For the reasons set forth below, I respectfully dissent.

WALLACE, Judge. Tamara Costello, individually and as co-personal representative of the estate of Scott Davis, deceased, appeals the trial court’s order awarding The Law Offices of Omar F. Medina, P.A., $50,000 in attorney’s fees and $4371.51 in costs for services rendered in a wrongful death action. The contingent fee agreement pursuant to which Mr. Medina claimed entitlement to the fees and costs awarded was signed by Gary

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are lawful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states’ laws that ordain such refusal.

Marilyn Kelly, J. This case involves a dispute over a construction contract. At issue is whether the limitations period in MCL 600.5839(1) applies to an action for breach of contract. The Court of Appeals held that it does and that the statute’s six-year limitations period expired before plaintiff filed its complaint, barring the suit.

571 F.3d 924 (2009) Timothy C. NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DAVIS; James Hyde, Chief of Police, City of Davis; John Wilson, Sergeant; The Regents of the University of California; Joyce Souza; Michael Mason, Sergeant; Bruce Davidson, Sergeant; Fnu Bates, Sergeant; *925 Javier Barragan, Officer; Brandon Jones, Officer; Calvin Chang, Officer; M. Garcia, Officer; Calvin Handy, Chief of Police, Defendant