Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT In re Frank Randolph Kelly and * Original Mandamus Proceeding Lacy Paige Brooks, No. 11-24-00066-CV * May 30, 2024 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

May 19 2009 DA 08-0611 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2009 MT 176N STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KELLY ALLEN FRANK, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Third Judicial District,

Opinion filed June 14, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals

Opinion filed June 14, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-12-00066-CR __________ FRANK DAMASON KELLY, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 358th District Cou

Opinion filed May 30, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00066-CV __________ IN RE FRANK RANDOLPH KELLY AND LACY PAIGE BROOKS Original Mandamus Proceeding MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Frank Randolph Kelly (Randy), is the for

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 6, 2011 ALBERT FRANK KELLY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 01-11190 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge No. W2011-01216-CCA-R3-HC - Filed March 15, 2012 The petitioner, Albert Frank Kelly, appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s dismissal of

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2005 ALBERT FRANK KELLY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. P-26794 Bernie Weinman, Judge No. W2004-01580-CCA-R3-PC - Filed March 4, 2005 The petitioner appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for pos

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03795-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2016). We de

Opinion filed May 30, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00031-CV __________ FRANK RANDOLPH KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE FAMILY TRUST UNDER WILL OF MIKIE LESLENE KELLY, AND LACY PAIGE BROOKS, Appellants V.

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Frank Randolph Kelly, * From the 244th District Court Individually and as the Trustee of Ector County, of the Family Trust Under Will Trial Court No. C-23-10-1140-CV. of Mikie Leslene Kelly, and Lacy Paige Brooks, Vs. No. 11-24-00031-CV * May 30, 2024 Coby Todd Bausch,

In an action to recover the down payment on a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), dated June 25, 2014, as denied that *781 branch of the defendants’ motion which was for an award of an attorney’s fee to the

OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.: Marlin.Kelly (“Kelly”) appeals the judgment of sentence imposed following his convictions of second-degree murder, second-degree murder of an unborn child, and criminal conspiracy to commit robbery.1 We vacate Kelly’s judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. Kelly and Tyrone Fuller (“Fuller”) were involved in the sale of heroin

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON PLAINTIFF’S ' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Harlin DeWayne Hale, United States Bankruptcy Judge On February 9, 2017, the Court held a trial to consider Nathan Kelly’s (the “Plaintiff’) Original Complaint [Docket No. 1] (the “Complaint”), filed in this adversary proceeding on November 14, 2016. The ultimate issue before the Court is whether the Plaintiff is an “owner”

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of *924an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), dated March 30, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendant Frank Darras for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Ordered that the order is reversed in

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of *924an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), dated March 30, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendant Frank Darras for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Ordered that the order is reversed in

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered January 18, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Roza 14W LLC’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint as against Roza 14W LLC.