Cases

684 F.Supp.2d 1096 (2010) Keevin BARKHOFF, Plaintiff, v. BOSSARD NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant. No. C09-2007. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. January 28, 2010. *1099 Bruce L. Gettman, Jr., Mark W. Fransdal, Redfern, Mason, Dieter, Larsen & Moore, PC, Cedar Falls, IA, for Plaintiff. Diane M.

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 3 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2021 January 11, 2022 CHARMAINE L. PARKER, Appellant (Respondent), v. S-21-0074 DAVID SPENCER COOK, Appellee (Petitioner). Appeal from the District Court of Natrona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIRJAM LETSCH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1840 (TJK) SOUTHERN PROPER HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Mirjam Letsch is a professional photographer who took the photo below that caught the eye of those pla

Miller, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. While I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) and Burkeen Construction Company, Inc. (Bur-keen), I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Utilities Protection Center, Inc. (UPC). In my

GANEY, District Judge. This is a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, by a third-party defendant to vacate1 the order granting leave to the third-party plaintiff to bring it upon the record pursuant to Rule 14(a). The plaintiff, a brakeman and citizen of Pennsylvania, brought this action against his employer, the Pe

Justice TODD, concurring. I concur with the majority that the Superior Court’s order must be affirmed, as I agree that a balancing of the Althaus1 factors weighs against the imposition of a duty of care to “unknown passengers” in a fleeing vehicle, where the term “unknown passengers” includes both “passengers whose presence in the vehicle or connection

GOLDEN, Justice. [T1] Catherine Lynnette Morris (Morris) submitted a worker's compensation claim for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits, and the Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation Division (Division) denied her claim. Morris sought review by the Wyoming Medical Commission (Commission), which upheld the Division's denial of benefits. The district court affirmed. [T2] On appeal, Morris does not co

102 B.R. 589 (1989) In re Albert J. STOWELL and Sarah K. Stowell, Debtors. Benito CARDENAS and Maria de Jesus Maldonado, Plaintiffs, v. Albert J. STOWELL and Sarah K. Stowell, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-11334, Adv. No. 88-1126. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. July 6, 1989. *590 Dale Ossip Johns

451 B.R. 378 (2011) In re The HARRIS AGENCY, LLC, Debtor. No. 09-10384 (JKF). United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 3, 2011. *381 Corinne Michelle Samler, Paul J. Winterhalter, Law Offices of Paul J. Winter-halter, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Debtor. Bradford J. Sandler, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wil

276 P.3d 399 (2012) 2012 WY 71 In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim of Catherine Lynnette MORRIS, Appellant (Employee-Claimant), v. STATE of Wyoming ex rel. WYOMING WORKERS' SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION, Appellee (Respondent). No. S-11-0167. Supreme Court of Wyoming. May 22, 2012. *400 Repr

ORDER James R. Sacca, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge The primary issue in the trial of this adversary proceeding is whether the Plaintiff, when he renewed a loan for more than $400,000, actually and reasonably, relied on the Debtor’s personal financial statement which showed a net worth of about $12,500,000 when the Debtor’s net worth was really closer to zero, but which financial statement contained one or mor

415 B.R. 769 (2009) In re YELLOWSTONE MOUNTAIN CLUB, LLC, Debtor. Credit Suisse and Timothy L. Blixseth, Plaintiffs. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, Yellowstone Development LLC, Big Sky Ridge, LLC, and Yellowstone Club Construction Company LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-61570-11. Adversary No. 09-00014. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana.

484 F.Supp.2d 32 (2007) Robert R. PRUNTÉ, and Yoworld Music Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0480(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2007. *33 *34 *35 Robert R. Pruntée,

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) appeals from the district court’s order awarding Sue Meredith social security disability benefits. We reverse the district court’s decision and affirm the administrative determination that Meredith was not entitled to disability benefits under the Social Security Act for the period in question. </

May 19, 1927. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an action for foreclosure of a mortgage on a lot of land situated in the City of Sumter. The circumstances giving rise to the action and the issues therein are as follows: On November 5, 1917, McCallum Realty Company, a corporation, the owner of said lot, on which was a small dwelling house, entered into a written contract with the defendant, Lizzie Rogers, a colored woman, whereby it contracted to sell, and she to purchas

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J. In October 1984, a Morris County jury convicted the defendant, James J. Koedatieh, for the murder of Amie Hoffman and sentenced him to death. He appeals directly to this Court as of right. See R. 2:2-1(a)(3). We affirm defendant’s murder conviction. Because the trial court failed to instruct the jury properly in the sentencing phase, however,

FRANK, Circuit Judge (dissenting). 1. From most interlocutory orders there is no appeal. From an interlocutory injunction, because of its marked capacity for harm, Congress permits an appeal. Unusual caution should be exercised in the issuance of such an order. Cf. Watson v. Buck, 313 U.S. 387, 61 S.Ct. 962, 85 L.Ed. 1416. In the case at bar, the preliminary injun

588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251