Cases

GERBER, J. The plaintiffs appeal from the circuit court’s order dismissing with prejudice their actions for defamation, negligent supervision, and negligent retention, and granting the defendants’ motion for sanctions under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2013). The plaintiffs argue that the court primarily erred in three respects: (1) finding that the absolute privilege exten

03/31/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 29, 2019 at Knoxville MICHAEL SHANE MCCULLOUGH v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. 17-CR-139 Jeffery W. Parham, Judge No. W2019-00629-CCA-R3-P

OPINION BY JUDGE COVEY Anthony L. D’Angelo (D’Angelo) appeals from the Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court’s (trial court) July 17, 2015 amended order finding D’Angelo liable to the City of Philadelphia (City) and finding in favor of Robert Righter (Righter) and Righter Parking, Inc. a/k/a Righter Pa

635 S.E.2d 434 (2006) LINCOLN TERRACE ASSOCIATES, LTD., Plaintiff v. Sharanza KELLY & All Occupants, Defendant. No. COA05-1563. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 3, 2006. No brief for plaintiff-appellee. Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A., by Julian H. Wright, Jr., Charlotte; Legal Aid of North Carolina, Inc., by Sharon S. Dove, for defendant

752 A.2d 188 (2000) 2000 ME 107 STATE of Maine v. Bobby Llamar KELLY. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 3, 2000. Decided June 2, 2000. *189 Michael P. Cantara, District Attorney, Jon C. Gale, Asst. Dist. Atty., David D. Gregory, of counsel (orally), Alfred, for State. Gregory O. McCullough

*11 Opinion HENNESSY, J. The defendant, the city of Bridgeport (city),1 appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the workers’ compensation commissioner’s finding that the plaintiff, Gary B. Kelly, is entitled to benefits pursuant to General Statutes § 31-284b2

McCullough v One Bryant Park (2020 NY Slip Op 08003) McCullough v One Bryant Park 2020 NY Slip Op 08003 Decided on December 29, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

BADALAMENTI, Judge. Tippy McCullough stole a 2013 Cadillac XTS out óf a car wash in Manatee County. McCullough’s theft precipitated a high-speed police chase, during which she struck—and caused the death of—a bicyclist. She now appeals her judgment and sentences after entering an open plea of no contest to leaving the scene of a crash with death, fleeing or eluding a law enforcement officer causing seri

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00078-CR Matthew Alan McCullough, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2024CR0204, THE HONORABLE ROBERT UPDEGROVE, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

BARNES, Presiding Judge. Based on evidence that he had multiple videos of child pornography on his laptop computer, a jury found Kyle Jameson McCullough guilty of five counts of sexual exploitation of children. McCullough filed a motion for a new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, McCullough contends that the trial court committed plain error in its charges to the j

195 S.W.3d 440 (2006) Paul A. McCULLOUGH, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Ella Mae McCULLOUGH, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 27116. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. May 12, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 2, 2006. *441 Richard L. Anderson, Branson, for appellants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OSCAR MCCULLOUGH, Plal`ntiff, V' Civil Action No. 14-296 (RDM) MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION To borrow from Tolstoy, all happy workplaces are alike, but each unhappy workplace is unhappy in its own way. This case is about one very unhappy workplace. Plaintiff Oscar McCullough claims that from 2009 to 2011, he had an extramarital affair with a coworker at the

[Cite as State v. McCullough, 2014-Ohio-1696.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO FAYETTE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2013-07-021 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION

McDonald, J. It has been said that "mercy without justice is the mother of dissolution; justice without mercy is cruelty." 1 A sentence of life in prison without parole may be just for certain adult offenders, but the Eighth Amendment's proscription against cruel and unusual punishments precludes that senten

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered January 31, 2012. The order, among other things, granted that part of the motion of defendants County of Niagara, James Voutour, and Guy Fratello seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint against them. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unani

Amended order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered March 25, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants One Bryant Park (Bryant), Durst Development, LLC (Durst), and Tishman Construction Corp. (Tishman) (collectively the Bryant defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the common-law negligence and Labor Law § 200 claims as against t

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00758-CV Robert Douglas Rue, Appellant v. Alicia McCullough Rue, Appellee FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-16-007132, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pre-award bid protest of a bridge contract planned after a competitively awarded contract was enjoined; justification and approval for sole-source award; standing; motion for preliminary injunction; equitable factors; absence of immediate irreparable injury OPINION AND ORDER 1 LETTOW, Judge.

Consolidated post-award bid protests; limitation on competition due to international agreement; 10 U.S.C. § 2304(c); FAR § 6.302.4; inapplicability of bar on jurisdiction over actions based on treaty; 28 U.S.C. § 1502; mistake in a critical eligibility criterion; latent defect discovered by procuring agency prior to award but not corrected; considerations affecting equitable relief OPINIO