Cases

PER CURIAM. Carl Cook filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against thirty-four individuals, most of whom were members of an Arkansas State Police (ASP) SWAT team or the Fifth Judicial Drug Task Force (DTF), and he claimed, in relevant part, that they used excessive and unreasonable force in *28the execution of a no-knock search warrant at his home on July 13, 1999, needles

PER CURIAM. Carl Cook filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against thirty-four individuals, most of whom were members of an Arkansas State Police (ASP) SWAT team or the Fifth Judicial Drug Task Force (DTF), and he claimed, in relevant part, that they used excessive and unreasonable force in *28the execution of a no-knock search warrant at his home on July 13, 1999, needles

Harvey, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Travers, J.), entered August 27, 1991 in Rensselaer County, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. On January 16, 1984, plaintiff Kelly A. Gibbons (hereinafter Gibbons), then 10 years old, was injured when she slid into a fence while taking part in ski lessons at the Jiminy Peak Ski facility in Hancock, Massachusetts. Gibb

11/08/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 11, 2024 HAROLD NOEL v. WILLIAM GIBBONS ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-1911-23 Mary L. Wagner, Judge ________

2022 IL App (2d) 210038 No. 2-21-0038 Opinion filed January 18, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ KATHLEEN GIBBONS,

[1] OPINION [2] The United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit, acting pursuant to Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, has certified to this court two questions of law, together with a statement of the facts relevant to the controversy in which the questions arose.1 [3] The relevant facts are as follows. In a chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding in the District of Rhode Island, the debtor, George E

People v Kelly (2020 NY Slip Op 04409) People v Kelly 2020 NY Slip Op 04409 Decided on August 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

ORDER Petitioner filed a motion on July 11, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars, 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Brian M. Gibbons be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner’s Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter. Judge Gibbons shall at all times be ves

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 172 Syllabus by the Court 1. It is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to prohibit the plaintiff from leading and impeaching an employee of an adverse party whom the plaintiff called, where the witness' prior written statement does not contradict his testimony at trial but i

410 A.2d 1354 (1980) WARWICK SCHOOL COMMITTEE v. Gerald T. GIBBONS et al. No. 79-427-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. February 8, 1980. *1355 Joseph A. Kelly, Albert B. West, Providence, for appellant. William T. Murphy, Asst. City Sol., Warwick, for appellees. OPINION WEISBERGER, Justice.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Petitioner’s motion to advance its appeal entitled Warwick School Committee v. Gibbons et al. ( No. 79-427-A is denied as moot, said appeal having already been assigned to the December, 1979 argument calendar.

ORDER The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Petitioner’s motion to advance its appeal entitled Warwick School Committee v. Gibbons et al., 410 A.2d 1354, is denied as moot, said appeal having already been assigned to the December, 1979 argument calendar. DORIS, J., did not participate.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-532 Filed: 21 July 2020 Lee County, No. 15 CVD 276 MICHAEL B. DALY, Plaintiff v. CHRISTY KELLY, Defendant Appeal by plaintiff from orders entered 7 March 2018, 28 January 2019, 10 June 2019 by Judge Mary H. Wells in District Court, Lee County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 November 2019. Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A., by M

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-532 Filed: 21 July 2020 Lee County, No. 15 CVD 276 MICHAEL B. DALY, Plaintiff v. CHRISTY KELLY, Defendant Appeal by plaintiff from orders entered 7 March 2018, 28 January 2019, 10 June 2019 by Judge Mary H. Wells in District Court, Lee County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 November 2019. Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A., by M

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. The Brady List In late 2016, the Association counted among its members approximately 7,800 deputy sheriffs. The Department sent a letter to roughly 300 of those deputies, informing them that a review of "individual employees' personnel records" had "identified potential exculpatory or impeachment

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. The Supreme Court recently held that the National Labor Relations Act does not invalidate individual arbitration agreements. Epic Systems Corp. v.Lewis , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1612 , 1632,

OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Petitioner Willard McCar-le/s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. McCarley argued in his petition that the Ohio Court of Appeals unreasonably applied clearly established Sixth Amendment law by allowing a child psychologist to rea

Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. New Jersey provides a broad range of discovery to an accused in a criminal case under Rule 3:13-3. This open-file approach is intended to ensure fair and just trials. Here, the issue is not whether defendants have a right to discovery of the prosecutor’s file in their case, but whether they

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0145p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - WILLARD MCCARLEY, -

PER CURIAM. Carl Franklin Cook appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for damages. Cook filed the complaint in January 2004, alleging that on July 13, 1999, defendants used excessive force in the execution of a search warrant, damaging his real and personal property. The district court dismissed the complaint as untimely because it was filed outside the three-year limitations peri