Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kelley v. United States”
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1932 KEVIN M. KELLEY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
Order Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, the United States of America. [DE 8]. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion [DE 12], to which Defendant replied [DE 13], thus, Defendant’s motion [DE 8] is ripe for review. For the reasons set fort
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
(2008) Jacy and Laura KELLEY, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Tracey Corporation, and Skyworld Aviation, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 1:08cv31 (GBL). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. September 19, 2008. MEMORANDUM ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendan
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** The park rangers in Glacier National Park exercised judgment as to how to maintain safe trails, as no policy or regulation mentioned the removal of snow or ice from trails. See Kelly v. United States, 241 F.3d 755, 760-62 (9th Cir.2001) (stating that discretion existed when safety policy did not mention, let alone prescribe a specific course of conduct). The maintenance ma
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
541 U.S. 905 KELLEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-7793. Supreme Court of United States. March 8, 2004. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kelley v. United Statespublic domain
535 U.S. 1070 KELLEYv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-9542. Supreme Court of the United States. May 13, 2002. 1 C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 275 F. 3d 56.
United States v. Kelleypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 22-408 (CKK) EDWARD KELLEY, Defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (November 7, 2024) The Government has charged Defendant Edward Kelley with multiple felony and misdemeanor
United States v. Kelleypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 22-408 (CKK) EDWARD KELLEY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 17, 2024) Defendant Edward Kelley faces trial on multiple felony and misdemeanor