Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keith v. Frederick”
Frederick Keith Houwen v. Lindy Kay McDanielpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0644 Filed October 1, 2025 FREDERICK KEITH HOUWEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. LINDY KAY McDANIEL, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Christopher L. Bruns, Judge. Frederick Houwen appeals the denial of his petition for relief from domestic
Frederick Holmes-Bey v. Keith Buttspublic domain
OPINION BAILEY, Judge. Frederick Holmes-Bey (“Holmes-Bey”), a prisoner in the Indiana Department of Correction (“DOC”) and participant in the Indiana Sex Offender Management and Monitoring (“SOMM”) Program, received a disciplinary sanction in February of 2014. He sought to file, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, a petitio
State of Tennessee v. Frederick Keithpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 24, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FREDERICK KEITH Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 93721 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2014-00448-CCA-R3-CD – Filed July 16, 2015 The appellant, Frederick Keith, was convicted in the Knox County Criminal Court of first degree felo
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Mar 06 2020, 9:34 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Suprem
United States v. Frederick Keith Singletonpublic domain
Affirmed in part and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge MOTZ joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: During the course of his criminal trial, Frederick Singleton sought to fire his court-appointed counsel because he was “not satisfied” with the way his counsel wa
Keith Harris v. Texas Veterans Commissionpublic domain
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Keith Harris is a resident of Texas and an honorably discharged veteran of the United States Army. He challenges the constitutionality of the residency requirements in the Hazlewood Act, which provides tuition waivers at public universities for certain Texas veterans who enlisted in Texas or were residents of Texas at the time they enlisted.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Wayne FREDERICK, Defendant-Appellantpublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW Defendant, Keith Frederick, was charged with three counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault against his stepdaughter, S.F., all arising out of a single incident alleged to have occurred in June of 1992. He was convicted on two counts and sentenced to 188 months in jail. He raises a number of issues on appeal, including prosec
OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Appellants Frederick and Sandra Dun-more appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of appellee Chicago Title Insurance Company. In three issues, appellants contend the trial court erred by (1) granting summary judgment in favor of appellee based on a statute of limitations affirmative defense, (2)
United States v. Barry Keith Wilson, United States of America v. Frederick Fernando McGeepublic domain
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Barry Keith Wilson and Frederick Fernando McGee were convicted of conspiracy to possess cocaine base with intent to.distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. McGee was also convicted of assault on a federal officer with a deadly weapon under 18 U.S.C. § 111. Wilson and. McGee have filed separate briefs on appeal and raise several separate issues
United States v. Frederick Alonzo Wallerpublic domain
OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. The Defendant-Appellant, Frederick Alonzo Waller (“Waller”), appeals his conviction for knowingly possessing a firearm after having been convicted of three violent felonies in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) and (3). On appeal, Waller argues that the district court erred by failing to suppress the weapons at i
Sowerwine v. Keithpublic domain
997 P.2d 1018 (2000) J. Frederick SOWERWINE and Judy Sowerwine, husband and wife, Appellants (Defendants), v. Robert J. KEITH and Michele R. Keith, husband and wife, Appellees (Plaintiffs). No. 99-190. Supreme Court of Wyoming. February 24, 2000. *1019 Representing Appellants: George L. Simonton of Simonton and Simonton, Cody, Wy
Frederick v. Heimpublic domain
HOUGH, Judge. The issue here presented is whether an agreement between physicians to provide “coverage” for each other is sufficiently definite and certain to give rise to an enforceable contract. The trial court found, under the circumstances presented, in the affirmative. We agree. Drs. Frederick, Heim and Leslie are orthopedic surgeons who, prior to October 7, 1994, practiced together in Osage Beach an
Frederick v. TPG Hospitality, Inc.public domain
56 F.Supp.2d 76 (1999) Opal FREDERICK, Plaintiff,[1] v. TPG HOSPITALITY, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-2310(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 14, 1999. *77 John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Kennedy & Dolan, Silver spring, MD, Peter S. Everett, Blankington & Keith, P.C., Fairf
Frederick White v. James Schotten, Wardenpublic domain
OPINION DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Frederick White appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In the petition, White challenges his 1989 state convictions for aggravated murder with a firearm specification, felonious assault with a firearm specification, and possession of a weapon u
166 F.3d 1207 Keith D. Wilkv.Frederick D. Frank, PA Board of Probation and Parole, TheAttorney General for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania NO. 98-3315 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. August 28, 1998 1 Appeal From: W.D.Pa.
Frederick v. Frederickpublic domain
617 S.W.2d 629 (1981) Janis FREDERICK (Schoonover), Respondent, v. Ricky Kent FREDERICK, Respondent, v. Susan GOTTMAN, Appellant. No. WD 31204. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 2, 1981. *630 William Y. Frick, Kirksville, for appellant. Keith W. Hicklin, Memphis, for respondent Ricky Kent Frederick.
FREDERICK v. STATEpublic domain
OPINION LUMPKIN, PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 Appellant Darrell Wayne Frederick was tried by jury and convicted of First Degree Malice Murder (Count I) (21 O.S. 2001, § 701.7(A)), Assault and Battery with A Dangerous Weapon, After Former Conviction of Two or more Felonies (Count II) (21 O.S.2001, § 645), and Domestic Abuse Assault and Battery (Count III) (21 O.S.20
FREDERICK v. STATEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:FREDERICK v. STATE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets
MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Frederickpublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 24-APR-2023 08:14 AM Dkt. 66 SO N
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00049-CV ___________________________ KEITH MORVANT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHNA MORVANT, DECEASED; AND LYNNE FREDERICK, Appellants V. DALLAS A