⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Keith Van Carter”

Carter v. Haynespublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 267 So. 3d 861
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. *863In this action regarding a motor-vehicle collision, Larry Carter appeals from a judgment of the Bessemer Division of the Jefferson Circuit Court ("the trial court") determining, among other things, that Daniel Keith Haynes was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law as to Carter's claim of wantonness and the iss
Carter v. Haynespublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 267 So. 3d 861
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. *863In this action regarding a motor-vehicle collision, Larry Carter appeals from a judgment of the Bessemer Division of the Jefferson Circuit Court ("the trial court") determining, among other things, that Daniel Keith Haynes was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law as to Carter's claim of wantonness and the iss
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-10-12 · Published · cited 0×
10/12/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 15, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON KEITH WOODS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 18588 Forest A. Durard, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-03-01 · Published · cited 135× · 421 U.S. App. D.C. 280; 815 F.3d 846; 99 Fed. R. Serv. 1069; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: In November 2000, a grand jury returned a 158-count superseding indictment against sixteen defendants. The indictment alleged that, during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, those defendants conspired to run a large-scale and violent nareotics-distribution business centered in Washington, D.C. The de
Carter v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005-02-10 · Published · cited 4× · 610 S.E.2d 181; 271 Ga. App. 588; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 445; 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 106
610 S.E.2d 181 (2005) 271 Ga. App. 588 CARTER v. The STATE. No. A04A2394. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 10, 2005. *182 Walter E. Van Heiningen, Thomasville, for Appellant. J. David Miller, District Attorney, James E. Hardy, James L. Prine II, Assistant District Attorneys, for Appellee. <
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2010-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-09-00090-CR ______________________________ KEITH ASHLEY HUBBARD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 5th Judicial District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 08F0792-005 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Mos
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2010-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued November 30, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-03-19 · Published · cited 34× · 481 F.3d 468
PER CURIAM. Indiana prisoner Keith Miller, who is 71 years old, is serving a 48-year sentence for his convictions on 18 counts of state securities violations. Miller, who was convicted in absentia after failing to appear for trial, attended his sentencing hearing but remained silent throughout the proceedings on the advice of his attorney, Kevin McShane. McShan
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 893 N.W.2d 879; 2017 WL 1417808; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 39
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1248 Filed April 21, 2017 LYLE H. ABBAS, F. DOW BATES, BRADLEY J. BROWN, SIDNEY E. CARTER, BRAD CHICOINE, RUSSELL J. COX, PAUL D. EBERLINE, JOSEPH N. GEELAN, RICHARD W. HAAS, REX J. JONES, KEITH L. KLEMME, ELIZABETH C. KRESSIN, STEVEN J. KRAUS, MARK A. KRUSE, RODNEY D. LANGEL, RONALD O. MASTERS II, KEVIN MILLER, STEVEN A. MUELLER, MARK A. NILES, VALORIE J. PRAHL, JENNIFER A. RASMUSSEN, RO
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007-10-11 · Published · cited 11× · 265 S.W.3d 107; 371 Ark. 295; 2007 Ark. LEXIS 530
265 S.W.3d 107 (2007) GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. James Allen CARTER; Janice Carter; David Bowie; Barbara Bowie; John L. Surrett; Rose Surrett; Marilyn Woods; and City of Crossett, Appellees. No. 07-105. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 11, 2007. *108 Charles Clifford Gibson III, Monticello, Samuel E. Ledbetter,
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2010-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 127 A.D.3d 181; 5 N.Y.S.3d 82
OPINION OF THE COURT Renwick, J. Petitioner James J. Seiferheld is a former New York City Police Department (NYPD) officer on disability retirement who was caught performing construction work while claiming to be disabled. After 11 years as an NYPD officer, Seiferheld incurred an on-the-job injury and applied for accidental disability retirement (ADR) benef
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 165 So. 3d 423; 15 La.App. 3 Cir. 67; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 1157; 2015 WL 3534113
KEATY, Judge. 11 Plaintiffs, Laura Guillory (Laura), Jimmy January (Jimmy), Pamela Sue January (Pamela), and Lynn Donald January (Lynn), appeal the trial court’s judgment dismissing their Petition to Annul Judgment in favor of Defendant, John Albert January, Jr. (January, Jr.), arising out of their deceased’s father’s succession proceeding.1 For the following reasons, the trial court’s judgment is
People v. Carterpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003-12-18 · Published · cited 17× · 801 N.E.2d 1163; 344 Ill. App. 3d 663; 280 Ill. Dec. 218; 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1549
JUSTICE GILLERAN JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the court: Following a bench trial, the defendant, Clemmie Carter, was found guilty of four counts of unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon (720 ILCS 5/24 — 1.1 (West 1996)) and one count of possession of a firearm without a valid firearm owner’s identification (FOID) card (
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00713-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF APPELLANTS MICHAEL EDWARD ROBERTS, DECEASED: TERESA D. HERD AND BRYAN K. WILLIAMS v. KEITH STOKES AND GLORIA JOHNSON APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/19/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KILEY CATLEDGE KIRK COURT F
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 6× · 252 S.W.3d 715; 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 2481; 2008 WL 943917
252 S.W.3d 715 (2008) In re TOWNLEY BYPASS UNIFIED CREDIT TRUST. No. 06-07-00025-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted February 13, 2008. Decided April 9, 2008. *717 William E. Wylie, William E. Wylie, PC, Keith Dollahite, Keith Dollahite, PC, Tyler, J.R. "Rusty" Phenix, Phenix, Phenix & Crump, Henderso
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2005-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00081-CR ___________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2003-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00088-CV _____________________
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-09-27 · Published · cited 0× · 112 N.E.3d 716
Bradford, Judge. *718 Case Summary 1 [1] In May of 2013, Appellees-Defendants Katrina Carter and Quentin Lintner (collectively, "the Lintners") signed a contract with Appellants-Plaintiffs Rainbow Realty Group,
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005-11-10 · Published · cited 14× · 216 S.W.3d 594; 364 Ark. 100
Jim Hannah, Chief Justice. Appellant, the City of Fort Smith, brings this appeal from the Crawford County Circuit Court’s award of attorney’s fees in an eminent domain action. The City argues that the circuit court misinterpreted and misapplied Rule 11 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure in awarding attorney’s fees. Appellees and cross-appellants, J.D. Carter, Mary Lois Carter, Lee. Hackler, and Patri