Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keith L. Fox”
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This bankruptcy appeal arises out of Bernard L. Madoff s Ponzi scheme and the subsequent bankruptcy of Bernard L. Ma-doff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) in the wake of the public revelation of that scheme. In early 2010, the appellants, Adele Fox and Susanne Stone Marshall, who each had invested money in BLMIS, sought to -file separate clas
Fox v. Picardpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: These consolidated bankruptcy appeals arise out of the multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Bernard L. Ma-doff (“Madoff’), and the subsequent bankruptcy of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) in the wake of the public revelation of that scheme. The appellants Adele Fox and Susanne Stone Marshall (collectively, the “
Fox v. Arkansas Department of Human Servicespublic domain
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge. . |,Appellant Tiffany Fox appeals the order of the Benton County Circuit Court terminating her parental rights to her son, D.C. 1 Her primary argument on appeal is that the circuit court erred in finding that termination was in the best interest of D.C.; specifically,
Keith S. Fox v. State of Floridapublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KEITH S. FOX, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2022-1715 [December 7, 2023] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County;
Keith Coffin v. Blessey Marine Services, Inpublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Blessey Marine Services, Inc. (Blessey) brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. The district court declined to decide as a matter of law whether nine individual plaintiffs (collectively the Plaintiffs), former vesseLbased tankermen on Blessey barges, who brought suit under the Fai
SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Certain former customers of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Secui’ities LLC (“BLMIS”) have filed a Complaint, dated Aug. 29, 2015 ( “DJ Complaint”) (ECF Doc. # 1)
Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Aereokiller, LLCpublic domain
OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether a service that captures copyrighted works broadcast over the air, and then retransmits them to paying subscribers over the-Internet without the consent of the copyright holders, is a “cable system” eligible for a compulsory license under the Copyright Act. I
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Once again, we are asked to review the liquidation proceedings involving Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) — the investment enterprise created by Bernard L. Madoff to effect his now-infamous Ponzi scheme. These consolidated appeals arise out of a permanent injunction entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CENTURY AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation, and RUBEN KEITH FOX, Appellants, v. LUIS LEAL, Appellee. No. 4D22-563 [December 8, 2022]
BURKE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Ronald K. Scherer died intestate in 2009. At that time, Appellant Lilyanna Knudson believed that the decedent was her biological father. She learned after his death that he was not. She filed a petition in district court seeking a determination that she was his heir. She based her claim on the Judicially-created doctrine of equitable adoption. Robert L.
Keith v. Beardpublic domain
464 S.E.2d 633 (1995) 219 Ga. App. 190 KEITH et al. v. BEARD et al. No. A95A1070. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 29, 1995. *635 Kirby & Roberts, L. Jack Kirby, Lagrange, for appellants. Freeman & Hawkins, Warner S. Fox, Atlanta, Sharon L. Ware & Associates, Kathryn A. Thurman, Tuc
Keith Hardware, Inc. v. Whitepublic domain
OPINION FRANKS, Judge. The issue on this interlocutory appeal granted pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 9, is whether the lease between the parties is too broad to be enforceable, as was held by the Trial Court. Since 1994, appellant has been a tenant in appellees’ shopping center, and the lease contains the following clause:
SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION AND DENYING MOTION FOR A STAY AND CROSS-MOTION TO DISMISS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: This long-running saga has thus far involved this Court, four District Court judges in two District Courts and two Circuit Courts of Appeal. The matter presently before
Fox v. Town of South Kingstown Zoning Brd.public domain
DECISION This matter comes before this Court on the appeal by James W. Fox and Nancy J. Fox ("Appellants") of a decision by the Zoning Board of Review of the Town of South Kingstown (the "board") granting the Kenneth E. Munroe Irrevocable Trust a dimensional variance and special use permit for property located in Kingston, RI. The board issued its written decision on April 3, 2006. A recitation of the facts of the
Davis v. Foxpublic domain
REILLY, P.J. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas dismissing her cause of action against defendant, Doug L. Fox. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that, on December 5, 1984, her car was struck from behind by a vehicle negligently operated by defendant. She also alleges that ten minutes later she was again struck from behind, this time by a vehicle negligently operated b
Fox v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. On the authority of Kelly v. State, 593 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Grissett v. State, 594 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(b), we summarily reverse appellant’s conviction and we instruct the trial court, on remand, to enter an order of discharge. REVERSED AND REMANDED. LETTS, GUNTHER and
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In Re Madoff)public domain
429 B.R. 423 (2010) SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: Bernard L. Madoff, Debtor. Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Plaintiff, v. Adele Fox, individually and to the extent she purports to represent a class of those similarly situated, and Susanne Stone Marshall, individually and to the e
Pence v. Foxpublic domain
813 P.2d 429 (1991) John R. PENCE, Individually, and Judy L. Pence, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Brittney Pence and Jared Pence, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Bingham R. FOX and Barbara A. Fox, d/b/a Raintree Products; Harold Struck and Betty Struck, d/b/a All Season Spas; Keller Supply Co., d/b/a Keller's Leisure Supply; and John Does I-V, Defendants and Respondents. No. 90-483. Supreme Co
J.T. Vanvoorhis and S.L. Fox v. Shrewsbury Twp.public domain
OPINION BY JUDGE COSGROVE' Shrewsbury Township (Township) appeals from a December 9, 2016 Order of the Court of Common Pleas of York Coum ty (trial court) that granted the appeal of Jeffrey Vanvoorhis and Susan Fox (Appel-lees) -and remanded the matter to the Board of Supervisors (Board) for further proceedings. Upon revi
PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court 1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in