Cases

NESBITT, J. Yvonnie Coffie appeals from the section of the final judgment below denying her Motion for Attorney’s Fees, despite the judgment in her favor in a breach of contract suit for “back pay.” We agree with Coffie that this denial of attorney’s fees was erroneous and, therefore, reverse that portion of the judgment, remanding to the trial court for a determination of the proper amount of fees. Coffie h

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ben Howard Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Defendant Percy B. Harvin *745from Smith’s civil action. This court may-exercise jurisdic

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ben Howard Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Defendant Percy B. Harvin. This court may exercise jurisdiction only *32over final ord

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ben Howard Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Defendant Percy B. Harvin. This court may exercise jurisdiction only *32over final ord

On Transfer Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 56(A) DICKSON, Chief Justice. Asserting violation of three provisions of the Indiana Constitution, the plaintiffs challenge Indiana’s statutory program for providing vouchers to eligible parents for their use in sending their children to private schools. Finding that the challengers have not satisfied the high burden required to invalidate a statute on con

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge. This matter is before me on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff, Shirley Vaughn. Also before me is Plaintiffs opposition and Defendants’ response. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is granted. BACKGROUND

PER CURIAM: Ben Howard Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing two defendants in his civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Smith seeks to

KEITH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a district court judgment which granted appellees’ motion for a directed verdict. Appellant filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that various prison officials had violated his constitutional rights. Appellant Leroy Bellamy is a blind inmate incarcerated for life at the Tennessee State Penitentiary. His handicap requires him to be dependent upon fello

CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Appellant Finneseth appeals from a final order in this action seeking dámagqs in connection with a boating accident dismissing her complaint insofar as it invoked the admiralty jurisdiction of the District Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1); 46 U.S.C. § 740. The remainder of the complaint, predicated upon negligence and invoking the diversity j

497 F.Supp. 481 (1980) Clifford FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Dan TRUDELL et al., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 80-73023. United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D. September 19, 1980. Clifford Freeman, in pro. per. Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. by Keith D. Roberts, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lansing, Mich., for defendant. *482<

981 F.Supp. 1239 (1997) Coffy L. MOSS, Plaintiff, v. ADVANCE CIRCUITS, INC., Mike Maxson, United Steelworkers of America Union, District 33, and its Union President, Wendy Larson, Defendants. No. 4-96-407 (DSD/JMM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. November 20, 1997. *1240

722 F.Supp. 1500 (1989) James MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 4:89CV0167. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. September 28, 1989. *1501 Michael Morley, Michael Morley Co., LPA, Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiff. Keith A. Savidge, Seeley, Savidge & Aussem Co., LPA, Cleveland,

KEITH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky granting appellees’ motion for a directed verdict in this suit alleging violation of appellant’s constitutional rights of privacy and liberty in contravention of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 For *767the reasons stated belo

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR Andrew W. Hull Gregory F. Zoeller APPELLEES Alice M. Morical Attorney General of Indiana J. Lee McNeely Hoover Hull, LLP McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Indianapolis, Indiana Thomas M. Fisher Harrold Solicitor General

HILLMAN, District Judge. Jack Rohtert, a homicide detective with the Nashville and Davidson County [Tennessee] Metropolitan Police, appeals a judgment against him in the amount of $39,-524.95 for willfully violating the constitutional rights of Fletcher Altman Smith [Smith] and Marguerite Elizabeth Smith [M. E. Smith]. (Although sharing the same last name, Smith and M. E. Smith are not related.) On May 24

729 F.2d 416 Leroy BELLAMY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Harold BRADLEY; Sgt. Loafman; George Baxter; S. Mathis;Ms. Watkins; Jim Rose; James Vandever; Richard Tedrow;Capt. Earl Lowe; Ralph Holloway; Donald Adams; & AlvinCarter; in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 81-5714. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued

ACCEPTED 01-15-00867-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/24/2015 10:18:56 AM

768 F.2d 765 38 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 677,38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,525, 26 Ed. Law Rep. 955 Linda LITTLEJOHN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jack ROSE, Individually and as Superintendent of theCalloway County Schools; and the Board ofEducation of Calloway County, Kentucky,Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-5063. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.