Cases

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the degree of evi-dentiary specificity with which a removing defendant must prove jurisdiction to defeat a motion to remand under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Defendant-Appellant Cricket *192 Communications, LLC (“Cricket”)

Filed 4/6/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT DARBY T. KEEN, as Trustee, B307538 etc., Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 19STCP02984 v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the Supe

Chief Judge Rubén Castillo, United States District Court Janice Keen ("Plaintiff") brings this 37-count employment discrimination lawsuit alleging that Teva Sales and Marketing, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (collectively, "Teva" or "Defendants") discriminated and retaliated against her because of her disability and gender in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"),

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-508C Filed: October 9, 2019 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: November 2, 20191 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * LAND SHARK SHREDDING, LLC, * Protestor, * Pre-Award Bid Protest; Motion to

ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In recent years a number of traditional or typical functions of state and federal government have been “outsourced,” “privatized,” or contracted out to the private sector. For example, many state and federal prisons are now operated under contract. In 2000, the Georgia Legislature removed jurisdiction over misdemeanor probation services from the Georgia

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-960C Filed: July 31, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** LW CONSTRUCTION OF * CHARLESTON, LLC, * Motion for Leave to Amend; * Delay; False Claims Act; Plaintiff, * Common Law Fraud; Unjust

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-960C Filed: July 31, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** LW CONSTRUCTION OF * CHARLESTON, LLC, * Motion for Leave to Amend; * Delay; False Claims Act; Plaintiff, * Common Law Fraud; Unjust

345 B.R. 69 (2006) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., Debtors. Adeiphia Communications Corp., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The America Channel, LLC, Alioto Law Firm and Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-41729(REG), Adversary No. 06-01528. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 26, 2006.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-970C Filed: July 13, 2018 ******************************************* * U.S. CONST. art. IV, § 3; amend. V, * Takings Clause; 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (Tucker * Act); 48 U.S.C. §§ 2101–2241 (2012 & ALTAIR GLOBAL CREDIT OPPORT

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1407 (Filed: September 15, 2025) ************************************* KANDI ARNHOLD, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, *

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1839 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. IAN FREEMAN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph N. Laplante, U.S. District Judge] Before

Appellate Case: 23-4074 Document: 123-1 Date Filed: 07/09/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 9, 2025

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: “When pondering sexy legal issues,” one commentator recently noted, “it is doubtful that tax law crosses the minds of many.”1 Yet, once in a while (alright, a long while), a tax dispute bursts into the mainstream. Take, for example, the legal controversy swirling around the so-called “Son of BOSS” transactions — the quoted phrase being short fo

21-2763 United States v. Aquart In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2022 No. 21-2763-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. AZIBO AQUART, AKA D., AKA DREDDY, AKA JUMBO, AKA AZIBO SMITH,

OPINION AND ORDER1 ME ROW, Senior Judge. In this pre-award procurement protest, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1), the protestor, Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC (hereinafter “IDT”), seeks in-junctive and declaratory relief to preclude the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”) from awarding a follow-on sole source Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) c

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. Pending before the Court is the government’s motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. At first blush, the motion appeared to the Court to present a simple matter for resolution. Plaintiff alleges, in a rather spare complaint, that it is the assignee of two Housing Assistance Payments (“HAP”) contracts made with the United State

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4509 Doc: 118 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 49 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4231 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MARTIN L. HUNT, a/k/a O.G. Martin, Defendant – Appellant.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4300 Doc: 122 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 49 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4231 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MARTIN L. HUNT, a/k/a O.G. Martin, Defendant – Appellant.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4358 Doc: 120 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 49 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4231 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MARTIN L. HUNT, a/k/a O.G. Martin, Defendant – Appellant.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4349 Doc: 125 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 49 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4231 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MARTIN L. HUNT, a/k/a O.G. Martin, Defendant – Appellant.