Cases

790 F.Supp.2d 106 (2011) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A. et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to: State of West Virginia ex rel. Darell V. McGraw, Jr., Attorney General v. Bank of America, N.A., et al. Nos. 08 Civ. 2516. 08 MDL No. 1950. United States District Court, S.D. New York. April

700 F.Supp.2d 378 (2010) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A. et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation This Document Relates to: All Actions. Civil No. 08 2516. MDL No. 08 1950. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 25, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration April 9, 2010.

708 F.Supp.2d 348 (2010) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A. et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to: City of Los Angeles v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.; 08 Civ. 10351; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A. et al., 09 Civ. 10102; City of Stockton v. Bank of America, N.A., et al., Civ. 10350; Contra Costa County

620 F.Supp.2d 499 (2009) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A. et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to All Actions. No. 08 Civ. 2516. 08 MDL No. 1950. United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 29, 2009. *504 Jeffrey B. Gittleman, Barrack

ACCEPTED 05-15-00369-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:10:20 PM

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff CitiMortgage, Inc.’s (“CMI’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 123); Defendant Equity Bank, N.A.’s (“Equity’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 115); and Equity’s Motion to Strike Portions of Affidavit of Isaac Miller. (Doc. 187). The motions are fully briefed and ready for disposition

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; GRANTING THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART WELLS FARGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; DENYING WELLS FARGO’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; and DENYING PLAINTIFF’S COUNTER MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 40, 42, 59, 63, 71, 75, 78, 85 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistra

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Keegan Valentich (“Keegan”) and Penny Valentich (“Penny”) jointly filed this suit against the United States (“Defendant”) alleging negligence on the part of a Lassen National Forest Service Employee during a vehicle accident on a Forest Service road. The accident injured Keegan and totaled Penny’s dirt bike. Penny seeks to

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffrey Phillips’s (“Plaintiff” or “Phillips”) Objections [139] to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand’s Final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [135]. The R & R recommends granting Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s (“Defendant” or “OLS”) Motion for Summary Judgment [104]. Also b

ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. In recent years, the federal courts have been inundated with lawsuits brought by homeowners challenging the foreclosures of the mortgages on their homes. Some of these lawsuits are meritorious, but many are not, and quite a few are frivolous. The most common type of frivolous lawsuit is premised on what judges often refer to as the “show-me-the-note” theory.

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 304) EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs in this multidistrict litigation— eighteen (18) individuals from thirteen different states — have filed a second consolidated amended complaint (“SCAC” or