Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Keary A. Richardson”
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 11-CF-1670, 11-CF-1671 and 12-CF-7 JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD,
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Householderpublic domain
HONORABLE KAREN NELSON MOORE, United States Circuit Judge, HONORABLE TIMOTHY S. BLACK, United States District Judge, HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WATSON, United States District Judge *992TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...994 A. General Overview of the Facts...994 B. Procedural History...1009 II
United States v. Ellerbeepublic domain
481 A.2d 473 (1984) In re Jerome RICHARDSON, Appellant. In re Leonard CADE, Appellant. UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. In re Carlton ELLERBEE, Appellee. Nos. 82-940, 82-941 and 83-146. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 12, 1983. Decided August 24, 1984. *476 Mark Carlin, Public Defender S
Leist v. Labor & Industry Review Commissionpublic domain
183 Wis.2d 450 (1994) 515 N.W.2d 268 Glenn A. LEIST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LABOR & INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION, Wisconsin Department of Employee Trust Funds and City of Marinette, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners. No. 92-2939-FT. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument February 2, 1994. Decided May 12, 1994.
In Re Feensterpublic domain
561 A.2d 997 (1989) In re Michael FEENSTER, Appellant. No. 86-985. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 7, 1989. Decided July 20, 1989. Marion E. Baurley, Washington, D.C., appointed by the court, with whom Gregory L. Lensbower, appointed by the court, was on the brief, for appellant. Barbara J. Matthews, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom
Matter of Reedpublic domain
571 A.2d 801 (1990) In the Matter of Michelle REED, Appellant. No. 89-263. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 9, 1990. Decided March 16, 1990. Elizabeth Taylor, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Public Defender Service was on the brief, for appellant. Richard F. Gondelman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. C
Newman v. Secretary of Health & Human Servicespublic domain
OPINION BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) denying her claim for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. *175Plaintiff alleges she became una
Matter of Plummerpublic domain
*753WAGNER, Associate Judge, dissenting: Essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Schwelb’s opinion, I agree that the trial court did not err in revoking appellant’s outpatient commitment and committing him for inpatient care. (Appeal No. 86-1697). In my opinion, the Hospital’s failure to comply strictly with the time limits specified in the civil comm
In Re Meltonpublic domain
565 A.2d 635 (1989) In re Tommie Lee MELTON, Appellant. No. 85-1589. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 26, 1989. Decided November 6, 1989. Harry J. Fulton, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, and Laurie B. Davis, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, for appellant. Janet L. Maher, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom F
In Re Meltonpublic domain
597 A.2d 892 (1991) In re Tommie Lee MELTON, Appellant. No. 85-1589. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued En Banc February 6, 1991. Decided October 4, 1991. *893 Harry J. Fulton, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Public Defender Service, and Page Kennedy, Public Defender Service, were on the brief,
Delaune v. City of Kennerpublic domain
550 So.2d 1386 (1989) Lydia K. Beckendorf, wife of/and Raymond H. DELAUNE v. The CITY OF KENNER, the State of Louisiana Through the Department of Natural Resources, and the Board of Commissioners of the Jefferson Levee District. No. 89-CA-187. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 12, 1989. Writ Denied December 8, 1989. Michael J. Pow
Yukon Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.public domain
By Judge Keary R. Williams This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel. On August 10, 2006, the Court heard oral arguments by counsel, admitted evidence, and took the motion under advisement. The Court has reviewed the pleadings, memoranda, and depositions filed in this case at great length. After examining the evidence along with applicable law and weighing counsels’ arguments, the Court
Wooley v. Lucksingerpublic domain
14 So.3d 311 (2008) J. Robert WOOLEY, As Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana v. Thomas S. LUCKSINGER, Michael D. Nadler, Stephen J. Nazarenus, Scott Westbrook, Michael K. Jhin, William F. Galtney, John P. Mudd, Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., Executive Risk Management Associates, Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Executive Liability Underwriters and Greenwich Insurance Co., AmCareco, Inc., AmCare Management, Inc. J. Rob
Hadley v. Berneropublic domain
GOODE, J. — In January, 1899, one A. J. Geraghty, owner, leased certain'premises in the city of St. Louis, *317for and during the term of five years to commence July 1, 1899, to Vincent Bernero and David Bernero, and the last oíanse in the lease read as follows: “It is further agreed between the parties hereto, that should a sale of said proper
Modern Woodmen of America v. Yanowskypublic domain
This suit was instituted by Minnie Yanowsky against the Modern Woodmen of America, an incorporated fraternal beneficiary organization, to recover $2,000 claimed to be due by virtue of the maturity of an insurance policy issued to Leon Yanowsky, a brother of plaintiff. The policy was payable to Shopsy and Rosie Yanowsky. Plaintiff claimed to own all the interests of both beneficiaries named in the policy, by virtue of inheritance and assignments from the beneficiary Rosie Yanowsky and from all
Alter v. Pickettpublic domain
Ludeling, C. J. This is an hypothecary action. On the twenty-sixth of January, 1866, the plaintiff obtained a judgment in the Third District Court of the parish of Orleans against R. C. Cummings & Co. for the sum of forty-six thousand one hundred and fifty dollars, with eight percent, per annum interest thereon. On the ninth day of February, 1866, Alter caused a writ of fieri faeias to issue under this judgment, di