Cases

494 F.Supp.2d 345 (2007) Dee Deidre FARMER v. Jack KAVANAGH[1] Bernard Ford, Joseph P. Sacchet, Karen A. Leisinger[2], Robert Miller, Patricia Allen, Sewall B. Smith, Maria Fisher. Civil Action No. CCB-02-3216. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 19, 2007. *346 *347<

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SANDERS, District Judge. On October 13, 1995, the Court held a hearing on whether to dismiss a longstanding lawsuit between the Plaintiff class; the State Defendants, who are individual representatives of the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation (“TXMHMR”); and Intervenor Advocacy Inc. I. HISTORY OF THE CASE

92 N.Y.2d 952 (1998) 705 N.E.2d 1197 683 N.Y.S.2d 156 Johanna M. Kavanagh et al., Appellants, v. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued October 14, 1998 Decided November 18, 1998. Mark E. Seitelman, New York Cit

*648MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SANDERS, Chief Judge. Pursuant to the Court’s Order entered April 25, 1991, a hearing was held on May 10, 1991 to determine whether sanctions should be imposed upon Defendants’ lead attorney in this case, a Texas Assistant Attorney General (the “Assistant AG”). For the reasons stated below, the Court finds a pattern of

783 F.Supp. 286 (1991) John LELSZ, et al., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John J. KAVANAGH, M.D., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3-85-2462-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. December 30, 1991. *287 David Ferleger, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs. Do

WATHEN, Chief Justice. James T. Kavanagh appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsehe, J.) in favor of plaintiff Harbor Funding Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation. Kavanagh argues on appeal that the court should not have permitted Harbor Funding to foreclose a mortgage on Maine property pursuant to Maine law, 14 M.R.S.A. § 6321 (Supp.1994), because the mortgage provid

673 F.Supp. 828 (1987) John LELSZ, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John J. KAVANAGH, M.D., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3-85-2462-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 13, 1987. Implementation Agreement October 15, 1987. *829

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2930 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Timothy Peter Kavanagh

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge, with whom CLARK, Chief Judge, RUBIN, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the en banc court’s refusal to correct and clarify the panel opinion. The underlying error of the panel is its refusal to distinguish between rights and remedies. The parties entered into an agreement intended by them to remedy claims of violation

WISDOM, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with the majority’s vacating the order of the district court. I would remand the case, however, for a hearing to determine whether the defendants have satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment criteria established in Youngberg as the minimum standards for the care of the mentally retarded. I disagree with the majority’s expansive view of the Eleventh Amendment a

ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER SANDERS, District Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Brief on Appointment of Special Master, filed July 14, 1986; Defendants’ Response to the Court’s Suggestion of a Special Master, filed July 14, 1986; Joint Response of In-tervenor ARC/Texas and Intervenor Advocacy, Inc. to Appointment of Special Master, filed July 10, 1986; and Brief of Inter-venor PART in Opposition to

629 F.Supp. 1487 (1986) John LELSZ, et al. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John J. KAVANAGH, M.D., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3-85-2462-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 4, 1986. *1488 David Ferleger, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs. Diane

MEMORANDUM OPINION JUSTICE, Chief Judge. On March 30, 1982, this court denied without opinion the motion to intervene of the Parent Association for the Retarded of Texas and others (“P.A.R.T.”). The intervenors appealed that ruling under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. On September 20, 1982, in order to facilitate a determination of the merits of the intervenors’ appeal, the Fifth Circuit ordered “a Limited Remand for Ent

Kavanagh, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cahill, J.), entered August 13, 2010 in Ulster County, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff is a prison inmate who, as part of his observance of the Yoruba/Santeria faith, wears bead necklaces. Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Directive No. 4202 states that an inmate may, with a permit, “possess a

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kuldip Singh and Hassen M. Rath a appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated October 21, 2005, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the grounds that they were not liable for the subject accident and that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury

Kavanagh, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (McDermott, J.), rendered July 1, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree. Defendant waived his right to appeal and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with one count of burglary in the second degree in order to, among other things, avoid prosecution for sever

Kavanagh, J. Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of Franklin County (Lawliss, J.), entered June 19, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction. In September 2002, defendant was convicted following a jury trial of the crimes of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, criminal contempt in the

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-430-CR JAMES THOMAS KAVANAGH APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

Kavanagh, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered November 14, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree, assault in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree. Defendant was charged in a six-count indictme

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-430-CR JAMES THOMAS KAVANAGH APPELLANT V. <