Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. Plaintiffs Saul M. Kaufman, Kimberly Stegich, Gordon Jarratt, and Amanda Rudd (the “Kaufman ” plaintiffs) and defendant American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc (“American Express”) (together, the “Settling Parties”) have moved for final approval of their Class Action Settlement (“the Settlement”). For the

MANION, Circuit Judge. Saul Kaufman, as lead plaintiff in a class action, sued American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“Amex”), alleging claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and statutory fraud related . to Amex’s .general-use, prepaid- gift cards. Just over two years after Kaufman filed the class action, Kaufman (on behalf of t

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. Plaintiffs (the “Kaufman” plaintiffs) brought this class action against defendant American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“American Express”), challenging certain fees assessed on American Express-issued gift cards. This matter is presently before the court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Preliminary A

POOLER, SACK, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges. POOLER, Circuit Judge: This Court frequently enforces mandatory arbitration clauses contained in commercial contracts. We do so on the principle that “it is difficult to overstate the strong federal policy in favor of arbitration, and it is a policy we have often and emphatically applied.” Arciniaga v. General Motors Corp., 460 F.3d 231, 234 (2d Cir.20

186 Ariz. 652 (1996) 925 P.2d 1369 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC. and First Data Corporation, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. John F. PARMETER and Minnie Parmeter, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees. No. 2 CA-CV 96-0050. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. October 17, 1996.

DAVIS, Chief Justice. *305[¶1] Trent Kaufman appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Rural Health Development (RHD) on his retaliatory discharge claim. He contends that genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment and that his claim should proceed to trial. We affirm. ISSUES

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 10, 2024 Decided July 18, 2025 No. 23-5183 CROWLEY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., APPELLANT v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION AND ROBIN CARNAHAN, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, APPELLEES Appeal from the Uni

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GXP CAPITAL, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N18C-07-267 ) PRW CCLD ARGONAUT MANUFACTURING ) SERVICES, INC.; TELEGRAPH HILL ) PARTNERS III, L.P.; TELEGRAPH )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GXP CAPITAL, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N18C-07-267 ) PRW CCLD ARGONAUT MANUFACTURING ) SERVICES, INC.; TELEGRAPH HILL

Filed 7/20/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DALIA ROJAS, D077931 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00023795- v. CU-MC-NC) HSBC CARD SERVICES INC. et al., Defendants and

554 F.3d 300 (2009) In re AMERICAN EXPRESS MERCHANTS' LITIGATION. *301 Italian Colors Restaurant, on or behalf of itself and all similarly situated persons, National Supermarkets Association, 492 Supermarket Corp., Bunda Starr Corp., Phoung Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, American Express Company, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 06-

06-1871-cv In re: American Express Merchants` Litigation UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT __________ August Term, 2007 Argued: December 10, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2009 Docket No. 06-1871-cv,

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 MARY F. WALRATH, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the Motion of Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. (“Greenwich”) for dismissal of the Amended Complaint filed by George L. Miller (the “Trustee”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND The background to t

362 B.R. 149 (2007) In re AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al., Debtors. George L. Miller, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Law Debenture Trust Company, of New York, The Berkshire Group LP, Michael W. Trickey, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-10203 (MFW), Adversary No. A-06-50826 (MFW). United States Ban

361 B.R. 747 (2007) In re AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al., Debtors. George L. Miller, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, The Berkshire Group LP, Michael W. Trickey, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-10203 (MFW), Adversary No. A-06-50826 (MFW). United States Bank

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 18, 2013 Decided March 14, 2014 No. 12-1036 HUGH B. KAUFMAN, PETITIONER v. THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of the Final Decision and Order of the United States Department of Labo

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 18, 2013 Decided March 14, 2014 No. 12-1036 HUGH B. KAUFMAN, PETITIONER v. THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of the Final Decision and Order of the United States Department of Labo

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 47 Michael J. Carlson, Sr., &c., Appellant, v. American International Group, Inc., et al., Respondents. Edward J. Markarian, for appellant. Kevin D. Szczepanski, for respondents American International Group, Inc., et al. Paul Kovner, for respondent American Alternative

(2008) The LOS OSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, et al. v. AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION. Case No. CV 08-01279 AHM (SSx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 12, 2008. Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held) A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves a dispute ov

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The morning of September 16, 2013 started as a typical Monday in the District of Columbia. So it was at the Washington Navy Yard. While some headed to their offices or meetings, others drank their morning coffee at their desks and chatted about their respective weekends. This was the case for Frank K