Cases

BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. On December 26, 2013, Jason Sandrock filed a complaint for declaratory relief and an injunction against his former wife, Cassie Sandrock, and his parents, Frederick Sandrock III (Fred) and Joellen Sandrock. 1 The complaint sought a declaratory judgment that funds Jason had recei

575 F.Supp.2d 762 (2008) Jacob GROBY III and Durrell H. Williams, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Angele DAVIS, In her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Administration and Suzie Elkins, In her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Louisiana Office of Community Development. Civil Action No. 08-1524. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

JOSEPH WAGUESPACK * NO. 2022-CA-0270 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL NEW ORLEANS POLICE * DEPARTMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CITY CIV

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. Bln this personal injury case, the plaintiff/appellee, Michael Hammond, alleges that he was injured when a piece of the ceiling in the apartment he was renting from the defendant/appellant, Ison Rah-saana, fell on his head. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgment. In June 2007, Mr. Hammond rented an apartment from Ms. Rahsaana;1

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. _JjThe plaintiff, CeCe Sloan, sustained injuries when her vehicle was struck by the vehicle of an underinsured driver. The defendant, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company, appeals from disputed elements in the jury verdict and the judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff. Ms. Sloan answered the defendant’s appeal and assigns various errors in the jury verdict and the judgment. For the following reasons

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: This matter involves an appeal from a bankruptcy judge’s interlocutory order and judgment. The bankruptcy court ruled on cross-motions for partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee First Guaranty Bank (“FGB”) that the Multiple Indebtedness Mortgage that FGB recorded is valid, and that the property underlying that mortgage, the Deluxe Motel, secure

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER J. MUNOZ, JR., No. 20-16327 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-00197- LRH-RAM GREGORY SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, OPINION Respond

122 F.Supp.2d 811 (2000) Jennifer GRATZ and Patrick Hamacher, for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Lee BOLLINGER, James J. Duderstadt, the Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Defendants, and Ebony Patterson, Ruben Martinez, Laurent Crenshaw, Karla R. Williams, Larry Brown, Tiffany Hall, Kristen M.J. Harris, Michael Smith, Khyla Craine, Nyah Carmichael, Shanna Dubose, Ebony Davis, Nicole Brewer, Karl

MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge. hThe plaintiff, Loconte Partners, L.L.C. [“Loconte”] appeals three judgments: (1) the October 7, 2011 granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant E.R. Systems, Inc. [“ERS”]; (2) the October 26, 2011 judgment finding no liability and dismissing with prejudice the remaining defendants, namely, Tim Montgomery,1 Montgomery and Associates, Inc., and their insurer, L

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

A. JOE FISH, Senior United States District Judge *691Before the court is the motion of the defendants the City of Mansfield, Texas (the "City"), Clayton Chandler ("Chandler"), and Tracy Aaron ("Aaron") to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), F.R. Civ. P. (docket entry 25). For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. hThe defendants/appellants, Robert Andrew Schiff and N.O.W. Properties, LLC,1 appeal from a judgment arising out of a failed business venture between Schiff and the plaintiff/appellee, Lidia Pollard (“Ms. Pollard”). After reviewing the record and applicable law, we amend the judgment and affirm as amended. This matter involved a partnership between Mr.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 646 Glenda LaFaye Jones was indicted for first-degree theft, a violation of § 13A-8-3, Ala. Code 1975. The trial court dismissed the indictment on the grounds that Jones was denied her constitutional right to a speedy trial. Pursuant to Rule 15.7, Ala. R.Crim. P., the State app

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED . STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced putative class action alleges violations of the following securities -fraud statutes through ■ Defendants’ scheme to optimize revenue in investment banking fees from UBS Securities LLC’s corporate client, Enron Corp. (“Enron”), at the expense and defrauding of UBS Financial Service’s brokerage retail clients, Lead Plaint

RONEY, Circuit Judge, with whom FAY and JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judges, join dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Neither the rehearing en banc nor the recent opinion reversing the denial of a writ of habeas corpus in this case has changed my opinion from when I dissented from the panel majority’s decision of this case. Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879, 907 (11th Cir.1982). I will here merely ech

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor

FREDERICKS HOMBERG WICKER, Judge. | ^Appellants, mother and maternal grandmother, complain of a trial court judgment awarding sole custody to the father, which is silent as to the mother and grandmother’s visitation rights beyond a transition period. While this appeal has been pending, the mother and maternal grandmother filed applications for supervisory writs complaining of subsequent trial court judgments addressing visitat

14‐3721‐cv(L) Montesa, et al. v. Schwartz, et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2015 5 6 (Argued: November 2, 2015 Decided: Septembe

I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN