Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Kathy M. Widener and Christopher M. Widener”
Stevens v. McBridepublic domain
492 F.Supp.2d 928 (2005) Christopher M. STEVENS, Petitioner, v. Daniel McBRIDE, Respondent. No. 4:03-CV-005 AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. January 13, 2005. *929 *930 *931 *932
Kane County v. United Statespublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-4087 Document: 010111008938 Date Filed: 03/04/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of PUBLISH Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 15-25-00030-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35 PM NO. ________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35:10 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk FILED: 2/6/2025 10:26 AM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk
516 F.Supp.2d 1072 (2007) In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Indirect Purchaser Actions. No. M02-1486PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 1, 2007. *1073 *1074 *1075
R. Held v. Statepublic domain
12/18/2024 DA 23-0575 Case Number: DA 23-0575 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2024 MT 312 RIKKI HELD; LANDER B., by and through his guardian Sara Busse; BADGE B., by and through his guardian Sara Busse; SA
Beard v. Robins Company, Incorporatedpublic domain
828 F.2d 1029 56 USLW 2202, 17 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 595,Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,971 Diana R. BEARD; Wendy Busch; Jeannette C. Bulinski; CarolCook; Laura Bein Emerson; Carol Evans; Melinda FrisonEvans; Barbara Ferguson; Nancy C. Franz; Janet Gamet;Mary Carmen Graham; Cheryl Ann Gruse; Ava Hamilton; MaryHein; Janet Heitzmann; Lucy Judson; Betty Kenzel; JudyKurtz; Susanne Leuthauser;
Beard v. A.H. Robins Co.public domain
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. This appeal by a group of Daikon Shield claimants in a Chapter 11 corporate reorganization proceeding involving the appellee A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, challenges the constitutionality of Section 1141(d), 11 U.S.C. It is conceded that Section 1141(d) provides that the confirmation of the plan of reorganization discharges all claims of any kind against a corporate debtor in a reorganizat
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS