Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00140-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

BARRY, Judge. Defendants Russell Thomas, Alita Lem-ieux, Thaddeus Bentley and Elton Washington were charged with two counts of armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64. Thomas pleaded guilty to accessory after the fact to armed robbery and received a five year *393sentence. Lemieux chose a bench trial and was acquitted. Bentley and Washington were found guilty as charged. Washing

ALBERT J. HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Soon after midnight, on June 5, 1981, Delta Airlines employees in Atlanta discovered a young woman, Kathy Hargan, hiding in the cargo bin of a plane preparing for departure to New York. Through subsequent conversations with Hargan, law enforcement officials began to unravel an elaborate stowaway scheme. As the officers learned, the object of t

[Cite as Elam v. Cuyahoga Cty. Dept. of Emp. & Family Servs., 2011-Ohio-3588.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95969 CAROLYN J. ELAM PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

HORTON, Justice. Gene Frances Stuart (Stuart) appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his fourth petition for post-conviction relief as untimely under I.C. § 19-2719. In this appeal, Stuart argues that I.C. § 19-2719 is inapplicable to him as it does not retroactively apply to his case, it is an ex post facto law, it violates the Idaho Constitution’s separation of

738 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2010) In re CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This document relates to All Actions. Master File No. CV-07-5944 SC. MDL No. 1917. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 30, 2010. *1013 Gilmur Roderick Murray, Murray & Howard, LLP, Geoffrey Conrad Rushing, Richard Alexander Saveri, Giann

694 F.Supp.2d 817 (2010) Elton R. KERR, Plaintiff, v. William W. HURD, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07-cv-297. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. March 15, 2010. *825 John Randolph Folkerth, Jr., Kenneth Joseph Heisele, Weprin Folkerth & Routh LLC, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff. Timothy

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Tax, and Costs, filed April 24, 2018 (Doc. 29)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on August 8, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether time that the Plaintiffs' counsel Mr. Olsi Vrapi spent in *10

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

316 S.W.3d 715 (2010) Raul NAVARRO, Doris Navarro, Virgina B. Abney, Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (A Federally Recognized Indian Tribe), Amarillo Financial Freedom I, LP, Amarillo Financial Freedom, Inc., Americo Acosta, Marquita Adamson, John H. and Dorothy P. Alexander, Raquel Avalos, John G. Alvarado, James R. Bailey, Bill J. and Betty L. Barker, Billy Barnes, Harvey A. and Babara S. Baycroft, Charles L. and Margaret D. Bechtold, Deborah A. Bench,

298 F.3d 219 In re HECHINGER INVESTMENT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, Debtor.Former Employees of Builders Square Retail Storesv.Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Patricia A. Staiano, Trustee.Edmund Adams, Vera L. Addison, Paul Ambrose, Mary Jo-Andrews, Kok Ang, Richard C. Athey, Chris Ausse, Carl F. Baker, William C. Barnes, Sharon Baum, Lois J. Bednarski, William F. Behl, Janet E. Bell, J. Brian Bird, Cheryl Blackburn, Denise Booker

491 U.S. 397 (1989) TEXAS v. JOHNSON No. 88-155. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 21, 1989 Decided June 21, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS *398 Kathi Alyce Drew argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were John Vance and Dolena T. Westergard.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 3, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAETRUS PILATE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 11-05220 Lee V. Coffee, Judge No. W2015-00229-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 29, 2016 Defendant, Daetrus Pilate, appeals his convictions for rape of a child, aggravated sexual ba

ACCEPTED 15-25-00141-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-25-00141-CV AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/24/2025 3:55 PM In the Court of Appeals

817 F.Supp.2d 1230 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The State of NEVADA, and The Office of the State Controller, Defendants. No. 3:09-CV-00314-LRH-RAM. United States District Court, D. Nevada. September 26, 2011. *1234 Holly A. Vance, U.S. Attorney's Office, Reno, NV, John P. Buchko, Jeffrey G. Morrison, Toni Michel

BOGGS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. That this case has been controversial is apparent from its effect of splitting our court right down the middle. That at times it involves intricate statutory analysis also cannot be gainsaid. However, as I shall endeavor to demonstrate, it is basically a very simple case.1 By their interpretation of a statutory phrase embodying an obvious legislative

PER CURIAM. These cases, motions of which were argued in tandem, deal with an issue of great significance: the constitutional boundaries of practices by the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) that subject citizens to being stopped and frisked. On August 12, 2018, Judge Shira A. Scheind-lin, a long-serving and distinguished jurist of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, held that the C

MEMORANDUM CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Plaintiff Melissa Ren’e Kennedy (“Plaintiff’) brought this action on June 1, 2012 seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1382. The Court referred the matter to United St

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-843L (Filed: June 27, 2018) *************************************** ALEX BROOKS, JR. et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Taking; * Threshold Title Issues; Centerline v.

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 29, 2010 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals