Cases

OPINION Appellee was charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated. He filed a motion to suppress, alleging that items seized from his vehicle were the fruits of an illegal search, undertaken pursuant to an unlawful detention and arrest. The trial court denied the motion as to the lawfulness of the arrest, but granted the motion as to the search. The State appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment a

*299 LANDAU, J. The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether the trial court correctly denied defendants’ motion to change venue. ORS 14.080(2) provides that venue is proper wherever a defendant engages in “regular, sustained business activity.” In this case, plaintiffs, a husband and wife, initiated

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. James R. Roebuck, a disappointed academic tenure candidate, sued his former employer, Drexel University, alleging that but for discrimination on account of his race, he would have acquired tenure. The suit was grounded on both 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1982) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 20

100 F.3d 1061 BARBARA R. SHERIDAN, Appellantv.E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, JACQUES AMBLARD No. 94-7509 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit Argued May 4, 1995Reargued en banc May 14, 1996Decided November 14, 1996 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delawar

794 N.E.2d 788 (2002) 206 Ill.2d 151 276 Ill.Dec. 538 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Mark BALLARD, Appellant. No. 88885. Supreme Court of Illinois. August 29, 2002. As Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing December 2, 2002. *794 Charles M. Schiedel, D

379 B.R. 257 (2007) In re DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., et. al., Debtors. Thomas A. and Pattiann Kurak, Plaintiffs, v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bank of New York Trust Co., N.A., Intervening Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 06-11202-KJC, Adversary No. 07-51715-KJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 7, 2007.

Chapter 11 OPINION Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the Corrected Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105 and 363 to Enforce the Court’s September 12, 2013 Sale Order and Injunction (D.I. 639) (the “Motion”) filed by Cenveo Corporation and Cenveo, Inc. (collectively, “Cenveo”). As explained below, Torres1 alleges

PER CURIAM: Appellant filed a claim with the Department of Health, Education and Welfare for disability benefits under Sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 416(i) and 423. The claim was denied at all administrative levels, and the appellant filed suit to obtain judicial review of the administrative deci

121 F.Supp.2d 887 (2000) Benjamin C. GARRETT, III & Kathryn Salyer, Plaintiffs, v. LANGLEY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al., Defendants. Nos. Civ.A. 4:99CV63, Civ.A. 4:99CV62. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. November 13, 2000. *888 *889

Cite as 2017 Ark. 52 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-16-821 Opinion Delivered: February 23, 2017 ROBIN M. EMIS APPELLANT V. APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT KEITH W. EMIS’

564 F.Supp.2d 322 (2008) Kathleen BOWERS, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-2600(JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 27, 2008. *327 Jennifer R. Clarke, Esq., Barbara E. Ransom, Esq., Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia and Richard L. Bazelon,

OPINION Justice McCAFFERY. We are called upon here to determine whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a separate trial of the claims of four test-case, or “bellwether” plaintiffs, from among the 45 plaintiffs in this case. For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that the Superior Court erred. This case stems

Matter of Clark v Clark (2021 NY Slip Op 06500) Matter of Clark v Clark 2021 NY Slip Op 06500 Decided on November 19, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-097 MMJ CCLD ) BP AMERICA INC., BP P.L.C., ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., ) CONOCOPHILLIPS,

701 F.Supp. 1177 (1988) Sharon Rowland FLOYD, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert D. Rowland and Ruby B. Rowland, Richard P. Von Buedingen, John B. Boatwright, Graf Bae Farms, Inc., and William H. Tucker, as Administrator of the Estate of Michael R. Drinkard, Plaintiffs, v. The OHIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Southern Aviation Insurance Group, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-1037-3. United St

ACCEPTED 03-15-00110-CR 5423648 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/26/2015 5:02:41 PM

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Presently before the Court is Ung’s Motion for Class Certification. For the reasons that

ORDER ON THE MANUFACTURERS’ DAUBERT MOTION No. 1 TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF ROBERT MURPHY ON SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS OF NONOBVIOUSNESS RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Rambus has accused the Manufacturers1 of infringing various patents. Trial is scheduled for January 19, 2009. Pursuant to a case management deadline for filing Daubert motions, the Manufacturers

339 S.W.3d 734 (2011) CEN-TEX CHILDCARE, INC. f/k/a Mesa Family Services, Inc., Appellant, v. Sheila Broderick JOHNSON, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sierra Odom, Deceased; Jonathan Odom, Individually; Tawnya Ballard, as Next Friend of Dante Andreus Jamieson Ballard, a Minor; and Heather Jamieson, Individually, Appellees. No. 02-10-00308-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

392 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. AND CONSOLIDATED CASE. Nos. CV96-0122-N-EJL, CV91-0342-N-EJL. United States District Court, D. Idaho. July 11, 2005. *1198 Alan G. Burrow, Celeste K. Miller, D. Marc Haws, U.S. Attorney's Office, Boise, ID, Kathryn C. Ma