Cases

02/10/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 18, 2020 Session KATHERINE MARIE LUGO v. HECTOR SANTIAGO LUGO Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-002498-17 James F. Russell, Judge ___________________________________

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

843 F.2d 122 58 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1789,46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,906,108 Lab.Cas. P 35,062, 46 Ed. Law Rep. 44 Mary Jane ARNOLD, Individually and on behalf of otherssimilarly situated, and Bonnie Y. Avery, Kathy L. Jennings,Dawn Bell, Patricia L. Bennett, Laura Gilson, Kathryn B.Thomas, Patricia M. Ault, Joyce S. Ritter, and Alta E.Loveland, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly s

OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises an important question pertaining to the enforcement of a federal judgment obtained under a federal employment discrimination statute against an unincorporated public entity established by a state legislature. The Pennsylvania legislature conceived and created BLaST Intermediate Unit 17 (BLaST) and charged it with providing educational services to me

SUPERIOR COURT KATHRYN DOWNEY v. EARL JOHNSON and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE Docket: 1884CV01875-C Dates: October 1, 2021 Present:

800 F.2d 1130 Arnold (Mary Jane), Avery (Bonnie Y.), Jennings (Kathy L.),Bell (Dawn), Bennett (Patricia L.), Gilson(Laura), Thomas (Kathryn B.), Ault(Patricia M.), Ritter (JoyceS.), Loveland (Alta E.)v.Blast Intermediate Unit 17, Mitstifer (Robert M., Dr.) NOS. 85-5449, 85-5450 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. JUL 24, 1986

Gardner, J.: Rarely do we permit a party to raise a new issue on appeal, but we must do so here. At oral argument, counsel for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. (BCBS) alleged, for the first time in this case, that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because tire only statute which BCBS allegedly violated does not provide a private right of action. Because we agree that both tire district court and this court

143 F.3d 1138 40 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 38 In re FEDERAL FOUNTAIN, INC., Debtor.David A. WARFIELD, Trustee of the Estate of FederalFountain, Inc., Appellant,v.KR ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Appellee. No. 97-3707. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 16, 1998.Decided May 11, 1998.Order Granting Rehearin

*494 VandeWalle, Chief Justice. [¶1] Connie Welker and Vicki Ostrem appealed from a district court judgment deciding ownership of mineral interests in Mountrail County. Welker and Ostrem argue the court erred in finding that a resulting trust exists and that the trust was not repudiated. We conclude the d

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT KENNETH CHATONE MANOKEY,  Petitioner-Appellee, v. LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden of the  No. 03-6932 Maryland Correctional Institution; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellants.  Appeal from the United States Distric

808 F.Supp.2d 145 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, State of California, State of Florida, State of Missouri, State of Texas, and State of Washington, Plaintiffs, v. COMCAST CORP., General Electric Co., and NBC Universal, Inc., Defendants. Civil Case No. 11-106 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 1, 2011.

Opinion BAXTER, J. We limited review in this case to the question whether a criminal defendant’s failure to challenge the “reasonableness” of a probation condition (Pen. Code, § 1203.1; People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, 486 [124 Cal.Rptr. 905, 541 P.2d 545] (Lent)) proposed at the probation and sentencing hearing constitutes a waiver of the claim on appeal.1</

Matter of Yeimi M. (Maria S. V.) (2024 NY Slip Op 00906) Matter of Yeimi M. (Maria S. V.) 2024 NY Slip Op 00906 Decided on February 21, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ___________________________________ ) DANNY L. ABBOTT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 15-211 L ) v. ) Filed: September 28, 2022 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) )

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on motions to dismiss by Defendants Steven H. Davis (Davis), Stephen DiCarmine (Di-Carmine), and Joel Sanders (Sanders).1 Plaintiffs Aviva Life and Annuity Company and Aviva Life and Annuity Company of New York (collectively, Aviva) resist. A hearing on the motions was conducted on March 13, 2014. Attorne

MEMORANDUM ** Y’vonne A’Rae Laisure-Radke appeals the district court’s order granting Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc.’s, and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss. The district court held that judicial estoppel barred *34Laisure-Radke from asserting her claims against Defendants. We have jurisdiction over this ap

MEMORANDUM ** Y’vonne A’Rae Laisure-Radke appeals the district court’s order granting Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc.’s, and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss. The district court held that judicial estoppel barred *34Laisure-Radke from asserting her claims against Defendants. We have jurisdiction over this ap

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Connie Welker and Vicki Ostrem appealed from a summary judgment quieting title to certain Mountrail County mineral interests. Welker and Ostrem argue the district court erred in granting Kathleen Markgraf and Marilyn Shanahan’s motion for summary judgment because Markgraf and- Shanahan’s claims are barred by thé statute of limitations, the court relied on inadmissible evidence, and Markgraf and

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. In this diversity case, Charles R. Tart appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his Missouri Human Rights Act claim of discriminatory discharge following a jury verdict in favor of Hill Behan Lumber Company (Hill Behan). Tart contends that the district court erred by refusing to instruct