⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kathryn A-M Hunter and Clayton W. Hunter”

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-05-09 · Published · cited 8× · 195 B.R. 342; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 461; 1996 WL 248762
195 B.R. 342 (1996) In re Walter J. CLAYTON, Jr., Debtor. Edward J. SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. Walter J. CLAYTON, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 95-15492DAS. Adv. No. 95-0854DAS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 9, 1996. *343 Eric L. Frank, Miller, Frank & Miller, Philadelphia, PA, for Debtor. Ed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009-06-22 · Published · cited 9× · 409 B.R. 770; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3106; 2009 WL 2475262
409 B.R. 770 (2009) In re 222 SOUTH CALDWELL STREET, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP f/d/b/a, The Park Condominiums, Debtor. Langdon M. Cooper, Trustee in Bankruptcy for 222 South Caldwell Street Limited Partnership v. BB Syndication Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-31710. Adversary No. 08-3151. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002-09-05 · Published · cited 573× · 305 F.3d 314; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18318; 2002 WL 2027329
305 F.3d 314 Peter Clayton McCLENDON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF COLUMBIA; et al., Defendants,City of Columbia; James R. Carney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-60256. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 5, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Kathryn Nea
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 9× · 510 S.W.3d 374; 2017 WL 491779; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 109
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge Introduction William Edwards (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions of two counts of assault in the second degree, two counts of armed criminal action, one count of resisting arrest, and one count of driving while revoked. He argues that his two convictions for assault resulting from the same act violate his
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2012-07-31 · Published · cited 29× · 380 S.W.3d 557; 2012 WL 3106624; 2012 Mo. LEXIS 164
ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge, dissenting. The majority opinion holds that § 513.380, RSMo 2000, provides only “use immunity” and that “there is no evidence that the Missouri legislature intended by its use to convert the statute’s express grant of authority to provide use immunity into an implied grant of authority to provide transactional immunity,” “nor does the statute use the language other state and federal statut
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2022-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ark. 94
Cite as 2022 Ark. 94 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 21, 2022 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2022 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PERCURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2022 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2022. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-04-07 · Published · cited 195× · 748 F.3d 1142; 2014 WL 1345499
DYK, Circuit Judge. These appeals arise from two takings suits related to the 2009 bankruptcies of General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”). The plaintiffs are former dealers of those companies whose franchises were terminated in the bankruptcies. The plaintiffs allege that these terminations constituted a taking because the government required them as a condition of its providing financial assistance
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-07-18 · Published · cited 114× · 760 F.3d 1070; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13733; 2014 WL 3537847
KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 888 S.W.2d 347; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1775; 1994 WL 631145
SIMON, Presiding Judge. Appellants, Sharon Lynn Conklin and Allen Thomas Coker, two of several defendants in the underlying action for instructions on the distribution of a testamentary trust brought by Trustee, respondent Boatmen’s Trust Company, appeal from an order granting the motion for summary judgment of respondents Georgiana Oliver deMonter, et al. (deMonter respondents), granting the motion for summary judgment of r
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2025-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00345-CR ________________ ANTHONY DWANE MOORE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________
Walker v. Bishoppublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 169 Ga. App. 236; 312 S.E.2d 349; 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3037
Per curiam. This action arose out of events related to a labor strike called by Laborers’ International Union Local 246 against a Georgia Kraft Company plant in Meriwether County. The plaintiff, Landis Ray Bishop, was a union steward and striking employee at the time the *237events took place, whereas defendant Walker was a non-striking employee. On November 28,1979,
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Amy Garrard and Lee Garrard, Guardians Ad Litem for R.C.G., A Minor; and Dean Frailey and Kathryn Frailey, Guardians Ad Litem for C.F., A Minor, Richard Nelson and Cheryl Nelson, Guardians Ad Litem for D.G.N., A Minor; Adam Olsen Ackerman; and A.E.P., III, Plaintiffs, v. Charleston County School District, Kevin Clayton, Axxis Consulting Company, and Jones Street Publishers, LLC, Defendants, And Eugene H. Walpole, Plaintif
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Amy Garrard and Lee Garrard, Guardians Ad Litem for R.C.G., A Minor; and Dean Frailey and Kathryn Frailey, Guardians Ad Litem for C.F., A Minor, Richard Nelson and Cheryl Nelson, Guardians Ad Litem for D.G.N., A Minor; Adam Olsen Ackerman; and A.E.P., III, Plaintiffs, v. Charleston County School District, Kevin Clayton, Axxis Consulting Company, and Jones Street Publishers, LLC, Defendants, And Eugene H. Walpole, Plaintif
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ A&D AUTO SALES, INC., ALLEY’S OF KINGSPORT, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER JEEP WEST, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC., ARCHER DODGE, INC., ARCHER FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., AXELROD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., AXELROD CHRYSLER, INC., BARRY DODGE INC., BENNETT AUTOPLEX INC., BENSON MOTOR INC., ARROW FORD, INC., BILL KAY SUZUKI, INC., BOARDWALK AUTO CENTER, INC., BOB LUEGERS MOTORS, INC., BO
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-04-08 · Published · cited 40× · 785 F. Supp. 2d 883; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132136; 2011 WL 1485479
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 Ark. 200
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-06-09 · Published · cited 98× · 824 F.3d 919
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971 LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL 3:09-cv-02371- ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, IEG-BGS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defenda
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973-03-30 · Published · cited 12× · 480 F.2d 11; 1973 A.M.C. 843
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge: This case arises from a collision on October 14, 1969 between the M/V Elaine Jones, a towboat owned and oper*15ated by Canal Barge Company, Inc. (Canal), and the Eads Bridge, a fixed structure that spans the Mississippi River at St. Louis, Missouri. The impact caused extensive damage to the bridge and resulted in the death of the towboat