Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 29, 2017 NO. 03-16-00548-CV Texas State University, Appellant v. Dr. Kathleen Quinn, Appellee APPEAL FROM 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD, AND SHANNON AFFI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00548-CV Texas State University, Appellant v. Dr. Kathleen Quinn, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 14-1061-C26, HONORABLE DONNA GAYLE KING, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACCEPTED 03-16-00548-CV 13131223 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00548-CV Texas State University, Appellant v. Dr. Kathleen Quinn, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 14-1061-C26, HONORABLE DONNA GAYLE KING, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER PER CURIA

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15‐1791 KATHLEEN HAGAN, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. PATRICK J. QUINN, et al.,

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated July 27, 2009, which, upon an order of the same court dated April 22, 2009, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and denying, as academic, his cross motion for s

■ HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs are former arbitrators for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission. In 2011, plaintiffs and another arbitrator brought a due process action challenging the implementation of House Bill 1698, a workers’ compensation reform statute that had terminated their six-year appointments under prior law. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, and we affirmed, concluding tha

OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: This cause is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint filed by Defendants Patrick J. Quinn, Jerome Stermer, and Yelisha Haddox. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ federal claim. As a matter of law, Plaintiffs’ lawsuit to protect their jobs was not constitutionally protected speech. In any event, Defe

Cohen, J. In this premises liability action, the plaintiff appeals from the allowance by a judge of the Superior Court of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We conclude that there remain genuine issues of material fact and that the case should not have been resolved as matter of law. Background. Viewing the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, see Augat, I

OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants *807Patrick J. Quinn, Governor of Illinois; Mitch Weisz, Chairman of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission; and the following commissioners of the Workers’ Compensation Commission: Mario Basurto, Kevin Lamborn, Y

Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. Illinois law provides that the Mayor of Chicago appoints the City's Board of Education. 105 ILCS 5/34-3. Until 1995, when this law took effect, the Mayor needed the consent of the City Council; now the Mayor acts on his own. In this suit under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act,

Lenk, J. The plaintiff, Kathleen Quinn-Weinstein, brings this medical malpractice action as the Ad-ministratrix for the estate of her mother, OraV. Quinn. The plaintiff alleges that doctors Kelly, Fernando, Singh, and DeFazio were negligent in their care and treatment of the decedent. Defendants Fernando, Singh, and DeFazio all have moved for summary judgment at this time.3

715 F.Supp. 127 (1989) Kathleen QUINN, Plaintiff, v. LIMITED EXPRESS, INC., and Jayne L. Sainer, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-576. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 9, 1989. *128 David F. Weiner, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Robert H. Shoop, Jr., Martin J. Saunders, Pittsburgh, Pa., James M.L. Ferber,

659 N.E.2d 684 (1996) Claudia RUETH a/k/a Claudia Firrek, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. John QUINN and Kathleen Quinn, Appellees (Plaintiffs Below). No. 45A04-9502-CV-34. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 12, 1996. Transfer Denied May 28, 1996. *685 Michael L. Muenich, Highland, for appellant. Timothy

Quinn-Jacobs v Moquin (2022 NY Slip Op 00571) Quinn-Jacobs v Moquin 2022 NY Slip Op 00571 Decided on January 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

Quinn-Jacobs v MoQuin (2021 NY Slip Op 03764) Quinn-Jacobs v MoQuin 2021 NY Slip Op 03764 Decided on June 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

Quinn v City of New Rochelle (2025 NY Slip Op 04586) Quinn v City of New Rochelle 2025 NY Slip Op 04586 Decided on August 6, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION LUCERO, Circuit Judge: David Hildes appeals from a district court order denying leave to amend his complaint. Hildes sought to add a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k, against former outside directors of Peregrine Systems, Inc. (“Peregrine”). The district court concluded that amendment would be futile because t

Quinn-Jacobs v Moquin (2022 NY Slip Op 00570) Quinn-Jacobs v Moquin 2022 NY Slip Op 00570 Decided on January 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

[Cite as State v. Quinn, 2022-Ohio-2038.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110692 v. : DWIGHT QUINN, :