Cases

Sutton, J. ¶1 We are asked to decide whether a criminal defendant facing involuntary medication to restore competency to stand trial has a procedural due process right to present an expert in his own defense. Christopher Lyons appeals the trial court’s order authorizing involuntary medication, arguing that he was denied due process when the trial court did not allow him to obtain his

Madsen, C.J. ¶1 S.S.Y.1 was convicted in juvenile court of first degree robbery and first degree assault. The trial court imposed two consecutive sentences on S.S.Y. pursuant to RCW 13.40.180. On review S.S.Y. contends the sentence violates double jeopardy protections because there is no evidence the legislature intended to punish first degree robbery and first degree assault separately. He also urges

Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 51 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-19-757 Opinion Delivered January 29, 2020 CONSTANCE DAY AND NEMIAH APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI GILLIAM COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, APPELLANTS TENTH DIVISION [NO. 60JV-

VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richard Roe ("Plaintiff") has sued The Hotchkiss School ("Defendant" or "Hotchkiss") *167for negligence, recklessness, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary duty related to sexual abuse by a Hotchkiss teach

37 A.3d 700 (2012) 303 Conn. 845 John A. CURRAN, III, Administrator (Estate of Leeann Curran), et al. v. Sherry L. KROLL et al. No. 18585. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued December 8, 2011. Decided March 13, 2012. *702 Michael G. Rigg, with whom was Donna R. Zito, Hartford, for the app

Opinion PALMER, J. This appeal arises out of a negligence action brought by the named plaintiff, Kathleen Mat-thiessen, 1 against the defendants, Dori Vanech and Nicholas Vanech, to recover damages for injuries sustained when the car the plaintiff was driving was struck by a vehicle operated by Dori Vanech and owned by her father, Nicholas Vanech. A jury returned a verd

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

247 F.Supp.2d 169 (2003) Maynard and Geneva SHELTRY, Plaintiffs, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UnumProvident Corporation, Defendants. No. 3:02CV26 (GLG). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 19, 2003. *171 Austin J. McGuigan, Bernard F. Gaffney, Putnam Hutchinson Perry, Rome McGuigan Sabanosh, Ha

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025

SCHALLER, J. The defendants and the plaintiffs filed separate appeals1 in a fraud and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA)2 action. The defendants3 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiffs on both counts.4 The defendants claim that the trial court i

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 367–405 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 13, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. This putative class and collective action is before the Court on several related motions. Defendant Charter Communications, LLC (“Charter”) moves (Doc. No. 183) for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ request for class relief in their claim for unpaid overtime wages under the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act (“Kentucky Act”), Ky.Re

CLECKLEY, Justice: The primary issue in this case is whether the circuit court employed the correct standard of review when it entered its own findings of fact and conclusions of law that were contrary to those of the family law master. The facts of the case provide the appropriate opportunity to discuss and develop more fully the standard of review a circuit court must apply in reviewing the findings and ultimate decision o

PALMER, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...273 II. ALLEGED FACTS...275 III. NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT...278 IV. WRONGFUL DEATH AND CUTPA: ISSUES OF STATE LAW...283 A. CUTPA Standing ...285 B. Statute of Limitation

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3