Cases

In an action to set aside a fraudulent conveyance of land, the defendants appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated June 20, 1990, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Ordered that on the court’s own motion, Cindy Durrant, as administratrix of the estate of Favia Durrant, is substituted as the plaintiff herein, and the caption is amende

Matter of Robinson v Kathleen B. (2021 NY Slip Op 04320) Matter of Robinson v Kathleen B. 2021 NY Slip Op 04320 Decided on July 9, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

MURRAY, RJ. In Docket No. 325471, plaintiffs, Edward Gallagher and Joan Gallagher, appeal as of right an order granting defendant Kathleen Persha’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8), on the basis that plaintiffs had failed to state a claim for fraud, and concluding that plaintiffs’ sole remaining claim of “piercing the corporate veil” was not viable without a

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter. 2015 UT 80 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ——————— INNOSYS, INC., Appellant, v. AMANDA MERCER, Appellee. ——

Chlef Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court: Introduction | 11 Under the at-will employment doctrine, an employer has broad discretion to manage its workforce and may, accordingly, fire an employee for any reason not prohibited by law. But there are several exceptions to at-will employment, including when an employee's termination v

*660 'AMENDED OPINION * Associate Chief Justice NEHRING, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION 1 Southern Management Corporation Retirement Trust (SMCRT) seeks review of the district

243 P.3d 1221 (2010) 2010 UT 22 PEAK ALARM COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation; Jerry D. Howe, an individual; and Michael Jeffrey Howe, an individual, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation; Shanna Werner, an individual; Charles F. "Rick" Dinse, an individual; Scott Atkinson, an individual; James Bryant, an individual; and John Does I-X, individuals, Defendants and Appellees.</

246 P.3d 102 (2010) 2010 UT 69 Nadine GILLMOR, individually and as trustee of the Nadine Fausett Gillmor Trust; Evergreen Development; Milton O. Bitner Company; Ella M. Pace; Dwayne M. Pace, trustee of the Dwayne M. Pace revocable trust; Joan J. Pace, trustee of the Joan J. Pace revocable trust; Gale W. Pace; Kathleen D. Pace; and Anderson Development, LC, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SUMMIT COUNTY, a political subdivisio

52 P.3d 1246 (2002) 2002 UT 71 In re Kathleen G. ARNOVICK, Valerie L. Cox, and Henry B. Wansker, Petitioners. No. 20010136. Supreme Court of Utah. July 26, 2002. *1247 Carolyn Montgomery, Salt Lake City, for petitioners. Katherine A. Fox, Joni Dickson Seko, Salt Lake City, for respondent Utah State Bar.

228 P.3d 747 (2010) 2010 UT 14 Lawrence BROWN, Marilyn Brown, Joseph Sorenson, and Kathleen Sorenson, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, v. The DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS OF the DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES of the State of Utah; Jerry D. Olds, in his capacity as the Utah State Engineer; and James A. McIntyre, Defendants and Respondents. No. 20080995. Supreme Court of Utah.

Chief Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 In this case, a group of residential tenants (collectively, Tenants) allege claims of negligence against Canyon Cove Properties, LLC, and Apartment Management Consultants, LL.C. (collectively, AMC). AMC argues that it was relieved from liability because Tenants signed a Residential Release Agreement (Agreement) that included a limit

Justice LEE, opinion of the Court: 1 In this case we are asked to answer a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cireuit concerning the preclusive effect of a decision like that in Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Lindberg, 2010 UT 51, 238 P.3d 1054. The state law question presented focuses specifically on whether our "discretionary review of a pet

WILKINS, Justice: 1 1 This case arises from the Tax Commission's (Commission) refusal to grant petitioners an additional hearing regarding the computation method used by the Commission to calculate interest paid on a refund. Petitioners also challenge the computation of interest. Kathleen K. Clements has not appeared either personally or through counsel, and as such, the decision of the Commission as to her is affirmed. Will

2021 UT 70 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, Respondent, v. ATHANASIOS CAPTAIN SEVASTOPOULOS, acting as the personal representative of the Estate of KATHLEEN SEVASTOPOULOS, Petitioner. No. 20200157 Heard September 13, 2021

Justice HIMONAS, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION 1 1 This case is about a demand for indemnification under the High Voltage Overhead Lines Act (HVOLA). Uran § § 54-8e-1 to -6. HVOLA prohibits any activity within ten feet of a high voltage overhead line unless the public utility operating the line has been notified of the "intended ac

DURHAM, Justice: 111 Petitioners, Stouffer Food Corporation ("Stouffer") and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("Liberty"), seek review of the court of appeals' decision in Stouffer Food Corp. v. Labor Commission, 970 P.2d 272 (Utah Ct.App.1998), holding them liable for death benefit payments to Kathleen Mae Moore beyond the initial 312 weeks after her husband, William Ray Moore, was injured while at work. We affirm, adopti

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2025 UT 30 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH KYLE MATHEWS, DIANE HANEY, and KATHLEEN MALLIS, Appellants, v. TOOELE COUNTY and SPENCER COX, in his official capacity as the Governor of Utah,

859 F.Supp. 1273 (1994) Pat TONNEMACHER and Charles B. Ackerman, individually and as representatives of a class, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy L. SASAK and Paula Sasak, husband and wife; et al., Defendants. CIV 89-0201-PHX-SMM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. February 28, 1994. *1274 *1275

This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH SPENCER J. COX, in his official capacity as Lieutenant Governor for the State of Utah, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA LAYCOCK, in her official capacity

122 P.3d 639 (2005) 2005 UT 66 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Kathleen Jo WORKMAN, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20040530. Supreme Court of Utah. October 4, 2005. *640 Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Kris C. Leonard, Asst. Att'y Gen., Michael S. Colby, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff. Linda M