Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kathie Felix”
331 F.3d 297 Felix Hilario SECAIDA-ROSALES, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Docket No. 01-4109. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued December 9, 2002. Decided June 2, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED A
In Re: Felix Dejean, IVpublic domain
PER CURIAM * This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Felix Anthony DeJean, IV, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY Before w
Felix C. Sickels v. State of Indianapublic domain
RUSH, Justice. In this case, the trial court determined that the custodial parent was the “victim” for purposes of criminal restitution for the noncustodial parent’s failure to support his dependent children. At the time the trial court ordered restitution, the children were adults and emancipated. On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals, sua
Felix v. Millikenpublic domain
463 F.Supp. 1360 (1978) Frank D. FELIX, d/b/a J. C.'s Rock Saloon, Back Seat Saloon Country Cousin, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Theresa Haver, Carol Prantera, Kathy Bugaj, Guardian Pharmacy, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Robert Sternberg, Jeffrey Scott Sternberg, and Jane Marie Smith, Plaintiffs, v. The Honorable William G. MILLIKEN, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan, Frank J. Kelley, in his official capacity as Attorney Gene
Felix Onwukwe v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued November 17, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The
Felix C. Sickels v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Jan 06 2012, 8:24 am FOR PUBLICATION CLERK of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
State of Tennessee v. Felix Bartolo Josepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 3, 2003 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FELIX BARTOLO JOSE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henry County No. 13306 Julian P. Guinn, Judge No. W2002-02532-CCA-R3-CD - Filed July 9, 2003 The Appellant, Felix Bartolo Jose, was convi
Fleischman v. Protect Our Citypublic domain
153 P.3d 1035 (2007) Chris FLEISCHMAN, a registered voter in the City of Phoenix, Kathy Roediger, a registered voter in the City of Phoenix, Alfredo Gutierrez, a registered voter in the City of Phoenix, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. PROTECT OUR CITY, a political organization, Defendant/Appellant, Mario Paniagua, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of Phoenix; Helen Purcell, in her official capacity as Recorder of Maricopa County, Ar
United States v. Candido Felix and Gloria Felixpublic domain
JAMESON, District Judge: Each of the appellants, Candido Felix and Gloria Felix, was convicted on one count of importing 6.5 pounds of heroin and on a second count of importing 10 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S. C. § 952(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. It is contended that the district court erred in (1) holding that appellants did n
DeJean v. Burgetpublic domain
Erik R. Noland DeJean & Norris, L.L.C. 604 Saint Ferdinand Street Baton Rouge, LA 70802 (225) 344-2639 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT: Felix Anthony DeJean, IV Joseph A. Boothe Smith, Taliaferro & Purvis P. O. Box 298 Jonesville, LA 71343 (318) 339-8526 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: Bradley R. Burget Felix Anthony DeJean, IV (In Proper Person) DeJean & Norris, L.L.C. 604 Saint Ferdinand Street Baton Rouge, LA 70
Douglas v. Konepublic domain
Douglas v Kone (2022 NY Slip Op 02531) Douglas v Kone 2022 NY Slip Op 02531 Decided on April 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Onyenwe v. Hamernickpublic domain
Onyenwe v Hamernick (2020 NY Slip Op 04314) Onyenwe v Hamernick 2020 NY Slip Op 04314 Decided on July 29, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
State v. Briscoepublic domain
GULOTTA, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence to three and one-third years’ imprisonment on two counts of forgery in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:72. We affirm the conviction, but remand the case to the trial court for sentence clarification. On March 22, 1982, Larry Moses closed his checking account at the Bank of New Orleans after his check book had been stolen from his car. On March 29, 198
A F v. State of Indianapublic domain
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana A.F., Appellant-Respondent FILED Nov 26 2024, 9:22 am CLERK
State v. Briscoepublic domain
GULOTTA, Judge. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT In State v. Briscoe, 471 So.2d 264 (La. App. 4th Cir.1985), we affirmed defendant’s conviction on two counts of forgery, 1) the false making of a check and 2) the issuing or transferring of the same check, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:72. We remanded the case to the trial court, however, for a clarification whether the concurrent sentences were to b
State of Indiana v. Devin A. Dickenspublic domain
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana State of Indiana, FILED May 06 2025, 8:51 am Appellant-Plaintiff CLERK Indiana Su
Brandon Lamont French v. State of Indianapublic domain
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Brandon Lamont French, FILED Appellant-Defendant Mar 11 2026, 9:46 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
Taylor Mitchell Fischer v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Dec 16 2025, 8:58 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on (1) SunTrust Bank’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. # 35) filed on May 11, 2012, and (2) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. #43) filed on May 29, 2012. Plaintiffs filed an Omnibus Opposition (Doc. # 47) on June 22, 2012. On Augus
BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: This appeal turns on sufficiency of the evidence challenges to a $50-million jury verdict, concerning a long-term contract to purchase natural gas. The verdict for the plaintiff-sellers was based on fraud during one period of the contract and breach of contract during another; but the district court- set aside the fraud portion. . Both sides appeal, r