Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Katherine E. Smith”
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KATHERINE ANNE SMITH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-2621 DOUGLAS W. SMITH AND E. DREW MITCHELL, INDIVIDUALLY, AS CO- PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ROBE
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KATHERINE ANNE SMITH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-4723 DOUGLAS W. SMITH AND E. DREW MITCHELL, AS CO- PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT H. SMITH. I
Hal Stanley v. Katherine Finneganpublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. *625 On January 12, 2015, child abuse investigators removed seven minor children from the private home of their parents, Hal and Michelle Stanley, in Hot Springs, Arkansas. After extensive state administrative and judicial child abuse proceedings, the Stanleys filed th
Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1109V Filed: February 22, 2022 ************************* * STACY SMITH, * * Petitioner, * Findings of Fact; Onset; SIRVA v. * (Not to be
Smith v. Smithpublic domain
AFFIRMED.
Smith v. Smithpublic domain
AFFIRMED.
Katherine Smith v. Barbara Robinsonpublic domain
Order entered September 29, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00503-CV KATHERINE SMITH, Appellant V. BARBARA ROBINSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Da
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 18, 2024 NO. 03-23-00319-CV Karen Bass and Lynn Smith, in their capacity as Successor Co-Trustees on behalf of the Amended and Restated George E. Bogle and Nancy T. Bogle Joint Revocable Trust, dated March 2, 2021, Appellants v. George Michael Bogle and Kath
Katherine Smith v. Barbara Robinsonpublic domain
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 31, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00503-CV KATHERINE SMITH, Appellant V. BARBARA ROBINSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, T
BARNES, Presiding Judge. Katherine B. Dean and Lester Harold Dean IV, individually and as administrators of the estate of their deceased child, filed this medical malpractice action against several defendants, including Dr. Henry J. Davis and Central Georgia Women’s Health Center, LLC (collectively, the “Davis Defendants”), seeking damages for the wrongful death of their child a
E. Dougherty D. v. Palmyra R-I Sch. Dist.public domain
STRAS, Circuit Judge. At issue here is what parents must do if they decide to sue a school district after refusing special-education services for their child under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"). Even if they bring a lawsuit under a different disability-discrimination law, we conclude that they still must exhaust their administrative remedies if the relief they
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00319-CV Karen Bass and Lynn Smith, in their capacity as Successor Co-Trustees on behalf of the Amended and Restated George E. Bogle and Nancy T. Bogle Joint Revocable Trust, dated March 2, 2021, Appellants v. George Michael Bogle and Katherine Leigh Bogle Leavitt, Appellees FROM THE
Smith v. Fedorpublic domain
LOCKEMY, C.J.: **121Edwin Smith, Jr. appeals the trial court's order granting David Fedor's motion for relief from judgment, arguing (1) the trial court erred in refusing to consider the confidential settlement agreement in determining whether Fedor satisfied the confession of judgment, (2) the trial court should have considered the merits of S
Smith v. Smithpublic domain
938 N.E.2d 857 (2010) Bruce R. SMITH, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Morgan L. SMITH, Appellee-Respondent. No. 02A03-1005-DR-276. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 20, 2010. *859 Daniel J. Borgmann, Helmke Beams LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Katherine E. Pollock, Lebanon, IN, Sherie L. Hampshire, Hampshire &am;
Madeline Cardenas v. Loretta E. Lynchpublic domain
OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: A consular officer denied the visa application of Rolando Mora-Huerta, a Mexican national, on the ground that he was a “gang associate” who intended to enter the United States to engage in unlawful conduct. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(A)(ii). This suit, by Mora’s wife, Madeline Cardenas, a United State
People v. Hannah E.public domain
877 N.E.2d 63 (2007) In re HANNAH E., Alleged to be a Person Subject to Involuntary Admission (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Hannah E., Respondent-Appellant). No. 1-06-1956. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. September 28, 2007. Rehearing Denied October 25, 2007.
People v. Hannah E.public domain
865 N.E.2d 294 (2007) In re HANNAH E., Alleged to be a person subject to Involuntary Admission (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Hannah E., Respondent-Appellant). No. 1-06-0139. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. March 23, 2007. *295 Laurel Spahn, Veronique Baker, Legal Advoca
Smith v. Clintonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Patricia Smith and Charles Woods have brought this action against the former Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton (“Secretary Clinton”), alleging that Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server caused the death of their sons Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods. Plaintiffs’ t
Rubenstein v. Smithpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [34] OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Defendants David E. Smith, MMB Holdings LLC, and Mojobear Capital LLC (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative, Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint for failure to join an indispensable pa
Smith v. Smithpublic domain
639 S.E.2d 711 (2006) John SMITH, and Katherine Sue Smith, his wife, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Irma SMITH Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 33063. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted: September 20, 2006. Decided: December 1, 2006. Jason R. Grubb, Beaver, for John Smith and Katherine Sue Smith. Richard M. Gunnoe, Gunnoe La