Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Katherine D. Williams”
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO EMILEE D. WILLIAMS, n/k/a ) ED111200 EMILEE COREY, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of Respondent, ) St. Louis County ) 09
Matter of Katherine Marrapublic domain
In a contested probate proceeding, the objectants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Lopez Torres, S.), dated January 14, 2013, as granted those branches of the petitioner’s motion which were for summary judgment dismissing their objections to probate based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. Ordered that t
Lincoln & Katherine Williams Irrevocable Trust v. Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ of Atlantapublic domain
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. This appeal is from the grant of judgment on the pleadings for the plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action over the ownership of a church property. The plaintiff/appellee, Deliverance Temple Church of God in Christ of Atlanta, commenced this action seeking a declaration that it owned the property upon which it is situated. In
Montz v. Williamspublic domain
MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. | sPlaintiffs/Appellants, Dayna Montz and Dwayne Montz, appeal the dismissal of their medical malpractice action with prejudice in favor of Defendant/Appellee, Dr. Katherine Williams, from the 40th Judicial District Court, Division “A”. For the following reasons, we vacate the jury verdict, reverse the dismissal of Appellants’ action, and remand the matter for a new trial. FACTS
*648 MELLOY, District Judge. Bettye Gentry and Katherine Whitley brought this diversity suit against Georgia-Pacific Corporation alleging they were discriminated against on the basis of gender in violation of the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 (“ACRA”), 'ArkCode Ann. § 16-123-107(c) et seq.
Montz v. Williamspublic domain
PER CURIAM. hln this medical malpractice action after a five-day jury trial, the jury found plaintiffs failed to prove the applicable standard of care for informed consent. The Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, reversed, concluding the jury’s finding was clearly wrong and without any reasonable factual basis on the record because “sufficient evidence, particularly through the expert testimony of both sides and the" medical p
In Re Trust of Katherine D. Grahampublic domain
11/17/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 18, 2022 Session IN RE TRUST OF KATHERINE D. GRAHAM Appeal from the Probate Court for Davidson County No. 20P-1787 David Randall Kennedy, Judge ___________________________________
Montz v. Williamspublic domain
In re Dayna Montz and Dwayne Montz; — Plaintiffs; Applying for Rehearing of this Court’s action dated April 8, 2016, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 47,212; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 15-CA-221. Rehearing denied. WEIMER and HUGHES, JJ., would grant.
Williams v. Brownpublic domain
OPINION John A. Gibney, Jr. United States District Judge This case involves the conviction of four innocent navy men—the “Norfolk Four”— charged with the rape and murder of Michelle Bosko. A fifth man named Omar Ballard actually committed the offense. Two of the four men, Danial Williams and Joseph J. Dick, have filed the petitions for writs of habeas corpus under consideration here. 2
Katherine D. Morgan v. Kenneth F. Morgan, Jr.public domain
12/07/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 20, 2021 Session KATHERINE D. MORGAN v. KENNETH F. MORGAN, JR. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 15-0301 W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge1
LEVINE, J. The issues in this case center on the procedural requirements for appointing a limited guardian advocate on the behalf of someone with a developmental disability. One issue relates to the court’s finding of good cause to proceed with the guardianship proceeding without the potential ward being present. The other issue concerns the requirements on a trial court when
Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec.public domain
Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED : 1. The February 11, 2019 R & R of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez, (Dkt. 33), is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED . 2. Petitioner Bolus A. D.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is GRANTED IN PART as addressed herein. 3. Within
Williams v. Statepublic domain
Ray, Judge. Following a jury trial, Laquan Williams was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of burglary1 and contributing to the deliquency of a minor.2 He appeals from his convictions and the denial of his motion for new trial, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, and that the trial court erred (1) in allowing identification testim
Williams v. Pennsylvaniapublic domain
Justice THOMAS, dissenting. The Court concludes that it violates the Due Process Clause for the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, a former district attorney who was not the trial prosecutor in petitioner Terrance Williams' case, to review Williams' fourth petition for state postconviction review. Ante, at 1906 - 1907, 1910. That conclusion is flawed. The specter of bias alone in a judicial proceeding is n
George W. Draper III, Judge Gary D. Sampson, Jr. (hereinafter, "Sampson") filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting his immediate discharge from probation. Sampson argues the circuit court erred in overruling his motion to be discharged from probation and setting the matter for a probation violation hearing because the circuit court lost authority
United States v. Williamspublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, Chief Judge. I. Introduction Defendant Paul Williams has been indicted for participating in a cocaine and heroin trafficking conspiracy and for the possession with intent to distribute cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. (Dkt. No. 1.) Pending are his motions for a bill of *119<
Katherine Harned v. Daniel V. Spurlock, D.O.public domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District KATHERINE HARNED, ) ) Respondent, ) WD84990 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: August 23, 2022 ) DANIEL V. SPURLOCK, D.O., ET
People of Michigan v. Kathleen Louise Williamspublic domain
Per Curiam. Following a jury trial, defendant appeals her convictions of larceny from the person, MCL 750.357, and larceny in a building, MCL 750.360. The trial court sentenced defendant to two years' probation for each conviction. We vacate defendant's conviction of larceny in a building but affirm her conviction of larceny from the person. I. FACTS
Williams v. Okenpublic domain
62 So.3d 1129 (2011) Ted WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Keith Robinson OKEN, M.D., et al., Respondents. No. SC10-92. Supreme Court of Florida. May 5, 2011. *1130 Joel Stephen Perwin, Miami, FL, and Bruce S. Bullock, Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner. *1131 Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman Sent
Goodell v. Williamspublic domain
676 F.Supp.2d 640 (2009) Charles L. GOODELL, Petitioner, v. Jesse WILLIAMS, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 3:08-CV-2479. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio. September 29, 2009. Order Denying Stay January 20, 2010. *641 Katherine A. Szudy, Office of the Public Defender, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner. Eliz