Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KATE ADAMS, No. 23-15970 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01499- v. WBS-KJN COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; ORDER AND SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, AMENDED OPINION Defendants-Appellees.

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judge REINHARDT joins, concurring: I join Judge Thomas’s opinion because it’s clearly right. I write only to observe that, even after the procedural irregularities that deprived Norse an opportunity to present evidence, it’s clear that the council members aren’t entitled to qualified immunity. In the Age of YouTube, there’s no need to take my word for

105 Cal.Rptr.2d 214 (2001) 25 Cal.4th 165 19 P.3d 567 FRIENDS OF SIERRA MADRE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SIERRA MADRE et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. S085088. Supreme Court of California. March 29, 2001. As Modified May 2, 2001. *216 Brandt

946 F.Supp. 1419 (1996) John KUCHARCZYK, Ph.D., an individual, and Michael Moseley, Ph.D., an individual, Plaintiffs, v. The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; Nycomed Salutar, a California corporation; Nycomed Imaging AS, a Norwegian business entity, Defendants. C-94-3886EFL. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 11, 1996.

Filed 5/3/16 (unmodified opinion attached) (review denied 8/22/16; reposted to include Supreme Court statements upon denial of review) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO BEATRIZ VERGARA, a Minor, etc., B258589 et al.,

Opinion BOREN, P. J. — In this lawsuit, nine students who were attending California public schools sued the State of California and several state officials, seeking a court order declaring various provisions of the Education Code unconstitutional. According to plaintiffs, these provisions, which govern how kindergarten through grade 12 public school teachers o

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 746 (2002) 27 Cal.4th 853 44 P.3d 120 GREAT WESTERN SHOWS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant. No. S091547. Supreme Court of California. April 22, 2002. *748 Lloyd W. Pellman, County Counsel, Lawrence L. Hafetz and Judy

O’Brien, S. This trial of the issue of the status of a contestant in the pending probate proceeding began on October 19, 1931, and with the exception of a recess of one day in November, and of three and a half days in Christmas week occasioned by the death of decedent’s sister, continued without interruption until Monday, January 11, 1932, at two p. m.; 149 witnesses were called in the trial, 834 exhibits were marked in evidence a

Sterrett, Judge: Petitioner, the Church of Scientology of California (California Church or Church), was incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in the State of California in 1954. In 1957, respondent recognized petitioner as an organization described in section 501(c)(3)1 exempt from Federal income taxes under section 501(a). In 1967, respondent revoked petitioner’s tax-exempt

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

OPINION AND ORDER AIKEN, Chief Judge: Defendants Jane O’Keeffe, Ed Armstrong, Morgan Rider, Colleen Johnson, Melinda Eden, Dick Pederson, Joni Hammond, Wendy Wiles, David Collier, Jeffrey Stocum, Cory-Ann Wind, Lydia Emer, Leah Feldon, Greg Aldrich, Sue Langton, Ellen Rosenblum, and Kate Brown move to dismiss plaintiffs American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Trucking Associations, Inc., a

100 F.Supp.2d 1209 (2000) M. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. Daryl F. GATES, et al. Defendants. No. CIV. 99-11696. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 20, 2000. *1210 Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann (Stephen Yagman, Marion R. Yagman, Joseph Reichmann), Venice Beach, CA, O'Neill, Lysaght & Sun LLP (Brian C. Lysagh

OPINION CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} “All persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness.” N.M. Const, art

BOREN, P.J. In this lawsuit, nine students who were attending California public schools sued the State of California and several state officials, seeking a court order declaring various provisions of California's Education Code unconstitutional. According to plaintiffs, these provisions, which govern how K-12 public school teachers obtain tenure, how they are dismissed, and how they are laid off on the basis of seniority, violate

After a lengthy jury trial, the Hardesty and Schneider plaintiffs obtained a verdict *1020exceeding $100 million against defendant Sacramento County and three defendant county officials based on defendants' actions the jury determined caused the closure of the Hardestys' sand and gravel mine and violated plaintiffs' constitutional rights under the First, Fourth and F

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 16:00:53 2014.01.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014

251 F.Supp.2d 919 (2003) Senator Mitch McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. National Rifle Association of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Emily Echols, a minor child, by and through her next friends, Tim and Windy Echols, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Chamber of Commerce of The United

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM 1 Presently before this three-judge District Court are eleven consolidated actions challenging as unconstitutional the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002) (“BCRA”) and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit its enforcement. The wide range of legal challenges raised by this litigati

129 B.R. 710 (1991) In re JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York. In re JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bernadine K. FINDLEY, as Executrix of the Estate of Hilliard Findley, Uma Lail Caldwell, as Executrix of the Estate of Odell Caldwell, Edward Lindley, Joseph C. Jones and James William Barnette, Jr., on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly